Fatigue analysis of FDM materials
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this paper is to determine the effects of fatigue on fused deposition modeling rapid prototyped acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) materials.
FDM dog bones based on UNI EN ISO 527‐1 (1997) were tested at 100, 80, 60, and 40 per cent nominal values of the ultimate stress for nine different print orientations. The samples were cyclically stressed in a tensile tester at 25.4 mm/min (extension) and relaxed at 12.7 mm/min.
Although FDM ABS has a tensile strength that is relatively close to that of the bulk material, up to 80 percent, its ability to absorb energy before fracture has a tremendous amount of room for improvement. FDM ABSplus (P430) material properties are noticeably more isotropic than the predecessor, ABS (P400). The ABSplus fractures in the order of thousands of cycles at 40 percent of ultimate stress load, while the ABS exhibits the similar cycle limits at 60 percent of its ultimate stress load.
FDM ABS parts are limited in fatigue characteristics even though they exhibit similar ultimate stress limits as with bulk materials, warranting further research in improving FDM parts expected to experience cyclical loads.
This paper adds knowledge to the limited fatigue data in literature for FDM ABS. It investigated the load cyclic data of fused deposition modeled ABS through analyzing its cycle‐by‐cycle strain energy, providing another means of identifying the fatigue characteristics of materials.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agarwala, M., Vikram, J. and Noshir, L. (1996), “Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 4‐19.
Ahn, S.H. and Montero, M. (2002), “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 248‐257.
Berti, G. and D'Angelo, L. (2010), “Mechanical characterization of PA‐AL2O3 composites obtained by selective laser sintering”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 124‐129.
Ciocca, L. and Fantini, M. (2009), “Immediate facial rehabilitation in cancer patients using CAD – CAM and rapid prototyping technology: a pilot study”, Support Care Cancer, Vol. 18, pp. 723‐728.
Crump, S.S. (1992), Aparatus and Method for Creating Three‐Dimensional Objects, Patent 5,121,329, Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN.
Danehy, P.M. and Alderfer, P.W. (2008), “Fluorescence imaging and streakline visualization of hypersonic flow over rapid prototype wind‐tunnel models”, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 222 No. 5, pp. 637‐651.
Fortus (2007), ABS, Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN.
Fortus (2011), ABSplus, Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN.
Hiss, R., Hobeika, S., Lynn, C. and Strobl, G. (1999), “Network stretching, slip processes, and fragmentation of crystallites during uniaxial drawing of polyethylene and related copolymers: a comparative study”, Macromolecules, Vol. 32 No. 13, pp. 4390‐4403.
Hizoum, K., Rémond, Y. and Patlazhan, S. (2011), “Coupling of nanocavitation with cyclic deformation behavior of high‐density polyethylene below the yield point”, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 133.
Hull, C.W. (1986), Apparatus for Production of Three‐dimensional Objects by Stereolithography, Patent 4,575,330, UVP, Inc., San Gabriel, CA.
Kroll, E. and Dror, A. (2011), “Enhancing aerospace engineering students learning with 3D printing wind tunnel models”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 17 No. 5.
Owida, A. and Chen, R. (2011), “Artery vessel fabrication using the combined fused deposition modeling and electrospinning techniques”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 37‐44.
Roylance, D. (2001), Stress‐Strain Curves, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139. 23 August.
Bartczak, Z. (2005), “Effect of chain entanglements on plastic deformation behavior of linear polyethylene”, Macromolecules, Vol. 38 No. 18, pp. 7702‐7713.
Tinius, O. (2010a), Benchtop Materials Testing Machines, Bulletin 140‐D, Horsham, PA.
Tinius, O. (2010b), Wedge Style Tensile Grips, Bulletin TD‐1001, Horsham, PA.