Fair-satisfied-based group decision making with prospect theory under DHLTS: The application in enterprise human resource allocation

Xing Liu1, Xunjie Gou1, Zeshui Xu1
1Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Tóm tắt

Group decision making (GDM) can make full use of information in the group and consider perspectives of multiple stakeholders, which matches the characteristic of enterprise human resource (HR) allocation. This paper tries to optimize the enterprise HR allocation by establishing a fair-satisfied-based GDM model with two objectives of fairness and satisfaction respectively. Firstly, double hierarchy linguistic term set is used to collect the evaluation information of decision makers (DMs). Then, two quantification methods for DMs’ satisfaction perception and fairness perception are respectively provided respectively based on the Prospect theory. Moreover, combining with the Pareto optimal idea, the fair-satisfied-based GDM model is designed and applied to deal with an enterprise HR allocation problem. Finally, some comprehensive analyses are made to validate the proposed method.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Argyris N, Karsu O, Yavuz M (2022) Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints. Eur J Oper Res 297(2):560–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.003 Basık F, Gedik B, Ferhatosmanoglu H, Wu KL (2021) Fair task allocation in crowdsourced delivery. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 14(4):1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2018.2854866 Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, Orlandi I, Heugens PPMAR, Boyd BK (2019) Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. J Manage. 45(1):122–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798026 Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2020) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90(1):166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166 Carneiro J, Saraiva P, Conceicao L, Santos R, Marreiros G, Novais P (2019) Predicting satisfaction: Perceived decision quality by decision-makers in web-based group decision support systems. Neurocomputing. 338:399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.126 Chen X, Zhao L, Ozdemir MS, Liang HM (2018) Mixed strategy to allocate resources with air pollution treatment in China: based on the analytic network process and large-group decision-making method. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25(17):16885–16899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1826-4 Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol. 86(3):425. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425 Crawshaw JR, Cropanzano R, Bell CM, Nadisic T (2013) Organizational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics. Hum Relat. 66(7):885–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713485609 Ficco M, Esposito C, Palmieri F, Castiglione A (2018) A coral-reefs and game theory-based approach for optimizing elastic cloud resource allocation. Future Gener Comput Syst 78:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.05.025 Friedkin NE, Proskurnikov AV, Mei WJ, Bono F (2019) Mathematical structures in group decision-making on resource allocation distributions. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37847-2 Fu C, Chang WJ, Yang SL (2020) Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction. Inf Sci. 518:309–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.021 George J, Wallio S (2017) Organizational justice and millennial turnover in public accounting. Empl Relat. 39(1):112–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-11-2015-0208 Ghoushchi SJ, Khazaeili M (2019) G-Numbers: importance-necessity concept in uncertain environment. Int J Manag Fuzzy Syst. 5(1):27–32 Gou XJ, Liao HC, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2017) Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: A case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Inf Fusion 38:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.008 Gou XJ, Xu XR, Deng FM, Zhou W, Herrera-Viedma E (2023) Medical health resources allocation evaluation in public health emergencies by an improved ORESTE method with linguistic preference orderings. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-023-09409-3 Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Herrera F (2018) Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 157:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.008 Gou XJ, Xu ZS, Liao HC, Herrera F (2021) Consensus model handling minority opinions and noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision-making under double hierarchy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Cybern 51(1):283–296. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2985069 Gou XJ, Xu ZS (2021) Managing noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision-making with linguistic preference orderings: The application in Internet venture capital. Inf Fusion 69:142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.12.003 Jing FY, Chao XR (2021) Fairness concern: An equilibrium mechanism for consensus-reaching game in group decision-making. Inf Fusion 72:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.024 Koopman J, Lin SH, Lennard AC, Matta FK, Johnson RE (2020) My coworkers are treated more fairly than me! A self-regulatory perspective on justice social comparisons. Acad Manage J 63(3):857–880. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0586 Laurita B, Castelli G, Resta C, Bresci E (2021) Stakeholder-based water allocation modelling and ecosystem services trade-off analysis: The case of El Carracillo region (Spain). Hydrol Sci J 66(5):777–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1895439 Lee MK (2018) Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data Soc 5(1):2053951718756684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684 Lee C, Ha BC (2021) Interactional justice, informational quality, and sustainable supply chain management: A comparison of domestic and multinational pharmaceutical companies. Sustain 13(2):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020998 Liang W, Goh M, Wang YM (2020) Multi-attribute group decision making method based on prospect theory under hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Comput Ind Eng 149:106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106804 Lieber EMJ, Skimmyhorn W (2018) Peer effects in financial decision-making. J Public Econ 163:37–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.05.001 Liu F, Zhang JW, Luo ZH (2021) Group decision support model based on sequential additive complementary pairwise comparisons. Appl Intell 51:7122–7138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02248-y Liu PD, Shen MJ, Teng F, Zhu BY, Rong LL, Geng YS (2021) Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy-based TODIM approach using evidential theory. Inf Sci. 547:223–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.07.062 Liu X, Xu ZS, Gou XJ, Xiao JL, Zhao YC (2023) A decision-making model for efficient fair electricity rationing under major power outrage emergencies. Int J Comput Commun Control 18(5):5554. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2023.5.5554 Liu X, Xu YJ, Gong ZW, Herrera F (2022) Democratic consensus reaching process for multi-person multi-criteria large scale decision making considering participants’ individual attributes and concerns. Inf Fusion 77:220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.07.023 Li XM, Xu LD (2020) A review of Internet of Things—resource allocation. IEEE Internet Things J 8(11):8657–8666. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3035542 Matta FK, Van Dyne L (2020) Understanding the disparate behavioral consequences of LMX differentiation: The role of social comparison emotions. Acad Manage Rev 45(1):154–180. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0264 Matteson ML, Ming Y, Silva DE (2021) The relationship between work conditions and perception of organizational justice among library employees. Libr Inf Sci Res 43(2):101093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101093 Pota M, Minutolo A, Damiano E, De Pietro G, Esposito M (2022) Betting on yourself: a decision model for Human Resource Allocation enriched with self-assessment of soft skills and preferences. IEEE Access 10:26859–26875. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3157640 Pourrezaie-Khaligh P, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Yousefi-Babadi A, Moon I (2022) Fix-and-optimize approach for a healthcare facility location/network design problem considering equity and accessibility: a case study. Appl Math Model 102:243–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.09.022 Roets A, Bostyn DH, De Keersmaecker J, Haesevoets T, Van Assche J, Van Hiel A (2020) Utilitarianism in minimal-group decision making is less common than equality-based morality, mostly harm-oriented, and rarely impartial. Sci Rep 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70199-4 Roy SK, Lassar WM, Shekhar V (2016) Convenience and satisfaction: mediation of fairness and quality. Serv Ind J 36(5–6):239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1186657 Seiti H, Hafezalkotob A, Martinez L (2019) R-numbers, a new risk modeling associated with fuzzy numbers and its application to decision making. Inf Sci 483:206–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.006 Sherf EN, Venkataramani V (2016) Friend or foe? The impact of relational ties with comparison others on outcome fairness and satisfaction judgments. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 128:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.002 Tang M, Liao HC (2021) Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 215:107821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107821 Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574 Yamazaki Y, Yoon J (2016) A cross-national study of fairness in Asia: How perception of a lack-of-group bias and transparency in the performance evaluation system relate to job satisfaction. Hum Resour Manage 55(6):1059–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21707 Wang XD, Gou XJ, Xu ZS. (2022) A continuous interval-valued double hierarchy linguistic GLDS method and its application in performance evaluation of bus companies. Appl Intell 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02581-2 Yang Q, Meng X, Zhao H, Cao CJ, Liu Y, Huisingh D (2021) Sustainable operations-oriented painting process optimisation in automobile maintenance service. J Clean Prod 324:129191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129191 Yeon MS, Lee YK, Pham DL, Kim KP (2022) Experimental Verification on Human-Centric Network-Based Resource Allocation Approaches for Process-Aware Information Systems. IEEE Access 10:23342–23354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3152778 Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E (2018) Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 13(3):55–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2018.2840738 Yu DJ, Li DF, Merigo JM, Fang LC (2016) Mapping development of linguistic decision making studies. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30(5):2727–2736. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-152026 Yu DJ, Li DF, Merigo JM (2016) Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(5):819–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0400-3 Zadeh LA (2011) A note on Z-numbers. Inf Sci 181(14):2923–2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022 Zhou YY, Zheng CL, Zhou LG, Chen HY (2023) Selection of a solar water heater for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on the best-worst method. Appl Intell 53(4):4462–4482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03688-w Zhang XM, Meng FY (2022) A large-scale group decision making method to select the ideal mobile health application for the hospital. Appl Intell 52(14):15844–15864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03273-1 Zhao L, Ye JH, Wu XX, Hu FP (2018) The Influence of the Tri-reference Points on Fairness and Satisfaction Perception. Front Psychol 9:193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00193 Zhao M, Wang YJ, Meng XY, Gou XJ (2023) Selection strategy of uniform expert evaluation scale in group decision making. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2023.2237993 Zhao WD, Pu S, Jiang DN (2020) A human resource allocation method for business processes using team faultlines. Appl Intell 50(9):2887–2900