Factors influencing outcomes of esophageal balloon dilatation for anastomosis site stenosis after esophageal atresia surgery

Pediatric Radiology - Tập 53 - Trang 349-357 - 2022
Seul Bi Lee1, Young Hun Choi1,2, Soo-Hyun Kim1, Yeon Jin Cho1, Seunghyun Lee1,2, Jung-Eun Cheon1,2,3
1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Tóm tắt

Esophageal balloon dilatation is an effective treatment for anastomotic strictures, but the factors affecting the outcome of dilatation remain unclear. To investigate the predictive factors of esophageal balloon dilatation outcome in children with anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair. We retrospectively reviewed children with esophageal atresia who underwent esophageal balloon dilatation for postoperative strictures between August 2007 and February 2021. We investigated each child’s age, weight and height; type of esophageal atresia surgery; shape, length and level of stricture; esophageal balloon dilatation balloon size; application of mitomycin; number of inflation sessions; and number of esophageal balloon dilatation sessions. The outcome of each esophageal balloon dilatation session was determined as improvement in stricture diameter between pre- and post-esophageal balloon dilatation esophagography. We used uni- and multivariate analyses with generalized estimating equations to evaluate outcome predictors. Overall, 69 children (mean age, 2.3 years; 45 boys) underwent 227 esophageal balloon dilatations. In the univariate analysis, the positive effect of esophageal balloon dilatation decreased with increased age, weight, height, balloon size and number of esophageal balloon dilatation sessions. Additionally, the positive effect was decreased in cervical-level strictures and with the application of mitomycin during esophageal balloon dilatation. In the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors of the positive esophageal balloon dilatation effect were age (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: −0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.01, −0.002), shape of stricture (IRR: –0.54; 95% CI: −0.91, −0.18) and number of esophageal balloon dilatation sessions (IRR, −0.10; 95% CI: −0.14, −0.18). Repeated esophageal balloon dilatation, older age and eccentric stricture shape are associated with poor response to esophageal balloon dilatation in children with anastomotic strictures after esophageal atresia repair.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Pinheiro PF, Simoes e Silva AC, Pereira RM (2012) Current knowledge on esophageal atresia. World J Gastroenterol 18:3662–3672 Cassina M, Ruol M, Pertile R et al (2016) Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of children with esophageal atresia: a 32-year population-based study including 1,417,724 consecutive newborns. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 106:542–548 Dingemann C, Eaton S, Aksnes G et al (2020) ERNICA consensus conference on the management of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: diagnostics, preoperative, operative, and postoperative management. Eur J Pediatr Surg 30:326–336 Gottrand M, Michaud L, Sfeir R et al (2016) Motility, digestive and nutritional problems in esophageal atresia. Paediatr Respir Rev 19:28–33 Krishnan U, Mousa H, Dall'Oglio L et al (2016) ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal and nutritional complications in children with esophageal atresia–tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 63:550–570 Tambucci R, Angelino G, De Angelis P et al (2017) Anastomotic strictures after esophageal atresia repair: incidence, investigations, and management, including treatment of refractory and recurrent strictures. Front Pediatr 5:120 Thyoka M, Barnacle A, Chippington S et al (2014) Fluoroscopic balloon dilation of esophageal atresia anastomotic strictures in children and young adults: single-center study of 103 consecutive patients from 1999 to 2011. Radiology 271:596–601 Antoniou D, Soutis M, Christopoulos-Geroulanos G (2010) Anastomotic strictures following esophageal atresia repair: a 20-year experience with endoscopic balloon dilatation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51:464–467 Rashed YK, El-Guindi M (2019) Endoscopic postdilatation application of mitomycin C in children with resistant esophageal strictures. Korean J Pediatr 62:395–399 Youn BJ, Kim WS, Cheon JE et al (2010) Balloon dilatation for corrosive esophageal strictures in children: radiologic and clinical outcomes. Korean J Radiol 11:203–210 Ko HK, Shin JH, Song HY et al (2006) Balloon dilation of anastomotic strictures secondary to surgical repair of esophageal atresia in a pediatric population: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1327–1333 Serhal L, Gottrand F, Sfeir R et al (2010) Anastomotic stricture after surgical repair of esophageal atresia: frequency, risk factors, and efficacy of esophageal bougie dilatations. J Pediatr Surg 45:1459–1462 Chiang CM, Hsu WM, Chang MH et al (2021) Risk factors and management for anastomotic stricture after surgical reconstruction of esophageal atresia. J Formos Med Assoc 120:404–410 Dai DL, Zhang CX, Zou YG et al (2020) Predictors of outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilatation in strictures after esophageal atresia repair: a retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 26:1080–1087 Lan LC, Wong KK, Lin SC et al (2003) Endoscopic balloon dilatation of esophageal strictures in infants and children: 17 years' experience and a literature review. J Pediatr Surg 38:1712–1715 Lang T, Hummer HP, Behrens R (2001) Balloon dilation is preferable to bougienage in children with esophageal atresia. Endoscopy 33:329–335 Zhu H, Shen C, Xiao X et al (2015) Reoperation for anastomotic complications of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 50:2012–2015