Factors Influencing the Use of Mobility Technology in Community-Based Long-Term Care
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, S. M, Foster, A. & Berg, K. (2001). Receiving help at home: The interplay of human and technological assistance. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 56B(6), S374-S382.
Brooks, L. L., Wertsch, J. J., Duthie, E. H., Jr. (1994). Use of devices for mobility by the elderly. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 93(1), 16-20.
Cagney, K. & Agree, E. M. (1999). Race differences in skilled nursing care and home health use: The mediating effects of family structure and social class. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B(4), S223-S236.
Cantor, M. & Little, V. (1985). Aging and social Care. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), The handbook on aging and the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 745-782). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Chadiha, L., Morrow-Howell, N., Darkwa, O. K. & Berg-Weger, M. (1995). Support systems of African American family caregivers of elders with dementing illness. African American Research Perspectives, 4(1), 782-791.
Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technological know-how. London: Pluto.
Congressional Budget Office. (1999). Projections for long-term care services for the elderly. Retrieved from www.cbo.gov
Coughlin, T. A., McBride, T. D., Perozek, M. & Liu, K. (1992). Home care for the disabled elderly: Predictors and expected costs. Health Services Research, 27(4), 453-479.
Covington, G. A. (1998). Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology: Why assistive devices don’t always assist. In D. B. Gray, L. A. Quatrano, & M. L. Lieberman (Eds.), Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective (pp. 77-88). Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
Coward, R. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Duncan, R. P. & Bull, C. N. (1994). An overview of health and aging in rural America. In R. T. Coward, C. N. Bull, G. Kukulka, & J. M. Galliher (Eds.), Health services for rural elders (pp. 1-32). New York: Springer.
de Klerk, M. M. & Huijsman, R. (1996). Effects of technical aids on the utilization of professional care: A study among unmarried 75-year-olds. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie, 27(3), 105-114.
Forbes, W. F., Hayward, L. M. & Agwani, N. (1993). Factors associated with self-reported use and non-use of assistive devices among impaired elderly residing in the community. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84(1), 53-57.
Fougeyrollas, P. & Gray, D. B. (1998). Classification systems, environmental factors, and social change: The importance of technology. In D. B. Gray, L. A. Quatrano, & M. L. Lieberman (Eds.), Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective (pp. 13-28). Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
Freedman, V. A. (1996). Family structure and the risk of nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51(2), S61-S69.
Gitlin, L. N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19(1), 4146.
Gitlin, L. N. & Levine, R. (1992). Prescribing adaptive devices to the elderly: Principles for treatment in the home. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 5(1), 107-118.
Gitlin, L. N., Levine, R. & Geiger, C. (1993). Adaptive device use by older adults with mixed disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(2), 149-152.
Hoenig, H., Taylor, D. & Sloan, F. (2001, May). Assistive technology is associated with reduced use of personal assistance among disabled older persons. Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Geriatrics Society, Chicago.
Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
Kemper, P. (1992). The use of formal and informal care by the disabled elderly. Health Services Research, 27(4), 421-451.
Langa, K. M., Chernew, M., Kabeto, M. U., Herzog, A. R., Ofstedal, M. B., Willis, R., et al. (2000). The quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 79.
LaPlante, M. (1993). Prevalence of mobility and self-care disability—United States, 1990. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 42(39), 760-761, 767-768.
Leff, B. A. & Burton, J. (2001). The future history of home care and physician house calls in the United States. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 56A(10), M603-M608.
Levy, S. M. (1999). Multidimensional assessment of the older patient. In J. J. Gallo (Ed.), Reichel’s care of the elderly: Clinical aspects of aging (5th ed., pp. 20-38). Baltimore: J.B. Lippincott.
Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. New York: Guilford.
Liu, K., Manton, K. G. & Aragon, C. (2000). Changes in home care use by disabled elderly persons: 1982-1994. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B(4), S245-S253.
Manton, K. G. & Hausner, T. (1987). A multidimensional approach to case mix for home health services. Health Care Financing Review, 8(4), 37-54.
Mathieson, K. M., Kronenfeld, J. J. & Keith, V. M. (2002). Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: The role of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and the use of mobility equipment. The Gerontologist, 42(1), 24-31.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1998a). 1994 national health interview survey on disability, phase I and II (CD-ROM Series 10, No. 8A). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1998b). 1995 national health interview survey on disability, phase I and II (CD-ROM Series 10, No. 10A). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (2002). National database of assistive technology information. Silver Spring, MD: Macro International.
Pope, A. M. & Tarlov, A. (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Reschovsky, J. D. (1996). The role of financing in the use of paid home care by disabled elderly. Unpublished manuscript.
Soldo, B. J., Agree, E. M. & Wolf, D. A. (1989). The balance between formal and informal care.In M. Ory & K. Bond (Eds.), Aging and health care: Social science and policy perspectives (pp. 193-216). London: Routledge.
StataCorp. (2001). Stata Statistical Software (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
Steinfeld, E. & Shea, S. M. (1995, November). Enabling home environments: Strategies for aging in place. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Los Angeles.
Stoeckle, J. D. & Lorch, S. (1998). Why go to see the doctor? Care goes from office to home as technology divorces function from geography. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 13(4), 537-546.
Struyk, R. & Katsura, H. (1988). Aging at home: How the elderly adjust their housing without moving. New York: Haworth.
Tennstedt, S. & Chang, B. H. (1998). The relative contribution of ethnicity versus socioeconomic status explaining differences in disability and receipt of informal care. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53B(2), S861-S870.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1985). Technological change and the U.S. older population. In Technology and aging in America (No. OTA-BA-264). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Verbrugge, L. & Sevak, P. (2002). Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57(6), S366-S379.