Factors Influencing Urologist Treatment Preference in Surgical Management of Stone Disease

Urology - Tập 79 - Trang 996-1003 - 2012
M. Adam Childs1, Laureano J. Rangel2, James E. Lingeman3, Amy E. Krambeck1
1Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
2Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3Methodist Institute for Kidney Diseases, Indianapolis, Indiana

Tài liệu tham khảo

Preminger, 2007, Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi, J Urol, 178, 2418, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107 Wignall, 2008, Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis, Urol Clin North Am, 35, 441, 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.05.004 Bandi, 2008, Current practice patterns in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in the north central United States, J Endourol, 22, 631, 10.1089/end.2007.0186 Matlaga, 2009, Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi, J Urol, 181, 2152, 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.023 Pearle, 2005, Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis, J Urol, 173, 848, 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7 Lotan, 2002, Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis, J Urol, 167, 1621, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65166-X Parker, 2004, Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser, Urology, 64, 1102, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040 Nabi, 2007, Extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi, Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD, 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub2 Srisubat, 2009, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones, Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD, 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2 Wolf, 2007, Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi, Urol Clin North Am, 34, 421, 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.010 El-Nahas, 2007, A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography, Eur Urol, 51, 1688, 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048 Perks, 2008, Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy, Urology, 72, 765, 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.046 Wiesenthal, 2010, Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi, Urol Res, 38, 307, 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0 Pearle, 2005, Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less, J Urol, 173, 2005, 10.1097/01.ju.0000158458.51706.56 Salem, 2009, A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi, Urology, 74, 1216, 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076 Joshi, 2003, Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility, J Urol, 169, 1065, 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90 Kijvikai, 2007, Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited, J Urol, 178, 1157, 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.132 Hollingsworth, 2010, Imaging use among employed and self-employed urologists, J Urol, 184, 2480, 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.030 Moser, 2005, Getting at the facts on imaging utilization growth, J Am Coll Radiol, 2, 720, 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.07.007