Factors Associated With Non-participation in a Face-to-Face Second Survey Conducted 5 Years After the Baseline Survey
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Deeg DJ, van Tilburg T, Smit JH, de Leeuw ED. Attrition in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:319–28.
2. Garcia M, Fernandez E, Schiaffino A, Borrell C, Marti M, Borras JM; Chis.Fu Study Group. Attrition in a population-based cohort eight years after baseline interview: The Cornella health interview survey follow-up (CHIS.FU) study. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:98–104.
3. Alonso A, Seguí-Gómez M, de Irala J, Sánchez-Villegas A, Beunza JJ, Martínez-Gonzalez MA. Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:351–8.
4. May AM, Adema LE, Romaguera D, Vergnaud AC, Agudo A, Ekelund U, et al. Determinants of non-response to a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the epic-panacea study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:148.
5. Bambs CE, Kip KE, Mulukutla SR, Aiyer AN, Johnson C, McDowell LA, et al. Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors associated with attrition in a prospective study of cardiovascular prevention: The heart strategies concentrating on risk evaluation study. Ann Epidemiol. 2013;23:328–33.
6. Batty GD, Gale CR. Impact of resurvey non-response on the associations between baseline risk factors and cardiovascular disease mortality: Prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63:952–5.
7. Pirzada A, Yan LL, Garside DB, Schiffer L, Dyer AR, Daviglus ML. Response rates to a questionnaire 26 years after baseline examination with minimal interim participant contact and baseline differences between respondents and nonrespondents. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:94–101.
8. Chatfield MD, Brayne CE, Matthews FE. A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:13–9.
9. Brilleman SL, Pachana NA, Dobson AJ. The impact of attrition on the representativeness of cohort studies of older people. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:71.
10. Goldberg M, Chastang JF, Zins M, Niedhammer I, Leclerc A. Health problems were the strongest predictors of attrition during follow-up of the GAZEL cohort. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1213–21.
11. Gustavson K, von Soest T, Karevold E, Røysamb E. Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: Findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:918.
12. David MC, van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Alati R, Green AC, Ware RS. Risk of attrition in a longitudinal study of skin cancer: Logistic and survival models can give different results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:888–95.
13. Hamajima N; J-MICC Study Group. The Japan multi-institutional collaborative cohort study (J-MICC study) to detect gene-environment interactions for cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8:317–23.
14. Hara M, Higaki Y, Imaizumi T, Taguchi N, Nakamura K, Nanri H, et al. Factors influencing participation rate in a baseline survey of a genetic cohort in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2010;20:40–5.
15. Shimanoe C, Otsuka Y, Hara M, Nanri H, Nishida Y, Nakamura K, et al. Gender-specific associations of perceived stress and coping strategies with C-reactive protein in middle-aged and older men and women. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21:821–32.
16. Yoshihara C, Shimizu S. [Social networks in drinking behaviors among Japanese: Support network, drinking network, and intervening network]. Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2005;40:441–54.
17. Heath D. Why we don’t know more about the social benefits of moderate drinking. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:S71–4.
18. el-Guebaly N. Investigating the association between moderate drinking and mental health. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:S55–62.
19. Chang L, Toner BB, Fukudo S, Guthrie E, Locke GR, Norton NJ, et al. Gender, age, society, culture, and the patient’s perspective in the functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1435–46.