Facilitating Molecular Biology Teaching by Using Augmented Reality (AR) and Protein Data Bank (PDB)

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355–385.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents' conceptions of AR learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 203–222.

Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 723–734). New York: Springer.

Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43–62). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3

Dunleavy, M. (2014). Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends, 58(1), 28–34.

Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). New York: Springer.

Gallagher, A. G., & O’Sullivan, G. C. (2011). Fundamentals of surgical simulation–principles and practices. Retrieved from http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/22492/jbk0307_974_975.pdf

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into the human faculty & its development. JM Dent and Company. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=V91CAQAAMAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Galton,+1883&ots=crKYQGAe1A&sig=hduPNx4tK2kAXnV2oMwOIeZlCiA

Ganley, C. M., Vasilyeva, M., & Dulaney, A. (2014). Spatial ability mediates the gender difference in middle school students' science performance. Child Development, 85(4), 1419–1432.

Gillet, A., Sanner, M., Stoffler, D., & Olson, A. (2005). Tangible interfaces for structural molecular biology. Structure, 13(3), 483–491.

Guilford, J. P., & Lacey, J. I. (1947). Printed classification tests. DTIC Document. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0651781

Holopainen, J., Mattila, O., Parvinen, P., Pöyry, E., & Seppälä, K. (2018). Employing mixed reality applications: Customer experience perspective. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2006). Mental imagery and the human brain. Progress in Psychological Science around the World, 1, 195–209.

Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction*. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91.

North, M. M., & North, S. M. (2016). A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1168 .

Palincsar, A. S. (2005). 12 Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In An Introduction to Vygotsky (Vol. 285).

Rodic, M., Zhou, X., Tikhomirova, T., Wei, W., Malykh, S., Ismatulina, V., ... & Kovas, Y. (2015). Cross-cultural investigation into cognitive underpinnings of individual differences in early arithmetic. Developmental Science, 18(1), 165–174.

Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.

Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615.

Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142.

Towle, E., Mann, J., Kinsey, B., Brien, E. J., Bauer, C. F., & Champoux, R. (2005). Assessing the self efficacy and spatial ability of engineering students from multiple disciplines. In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE’05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference (p. S2C–15). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1612216

Treisman, A. M. (1964). Verbal cues, language, and meaning in selective attention. The American Journal of Psychology, 77, 206–219.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221–234.