Facilitated communication: Better education through applied ideology

Journal of Behavioral Education - Tập 4 - Trang 93-105 - 1994
John W. Jacobson1, James A. Mulick2
1Planning Bureau, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Albany
2Departments of Pediatrics and Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus

Tóm tắt

Facilitated communication (FC), or the provision of graduated assistance by staff in the selection of keys on a communication device by people with developmental disabilities, has become a widely used training technique. Although widespread anecdotal accounts of substantial training benefits and unanticipated communicative competence have been reported, controlled experimental and single subject studies have disclosed little evidence of unexpected competencies. We review research on FC, identify cognitive factors that may stimulate acceptance of this as a training method, and suggest procedures to be employed in individual validation situations when critical communications occur.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aach, J. (1991). Science and common sense skepticism.Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 51–57. Alcock, J. E. (1986). Parapsychology's past eight years: A lack-of-progress report. In. K. Frazier (Ed.),Science confronts the paranormal (pp. 20–27). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. Attwood, A., & Remington-Gurney, J. (in press). Assessment of literacy skills using facilitated communication. In C. E. Van Kraayenoord (Ed.),A survey of adult literacy provision for people with intellectual disabilities, Vol 2: Reviews, studies, and questionnaire surveys and special projects. Brisbane, AU: Schonnel Special Education Research Centre. Bailey, J. S. (1992). Gentle teaching: Trying to win friends and influence people with euphemism, metaphor, smoke, and mirrors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 879–884. Bargh, J. A. (1988). Automatic information processing: Implications for communication and affect. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.),Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 9–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Biklen, D. (1991). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314. Biklen, D. (1992). Autism orthodoxy versus free speech: A reply to Cummins and Prior.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 242–256. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Gold, D., Berrigan, C., & Swamianthan, S. (1992). Facilitated communication: Implications for individuals with autism.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 1–28. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Saha, S. N., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). “I AMN NOT A UTISTIVC OH THJE TYP” (“I'm not autistic on the typewriter”).Disability, Handicap & Society, 6, 161–180. Biklen, D., & Schubert, A. (1991). New words: The communication of students with autism.Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 46–57. Blackmore, S. (1986–1987). The elusive open mind: Ten years of negative research in parapsychology.Skeptical Inquirer, 11, 244–255. Blackmore, S. (1991). Near-death experiences: In or out of body?Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 34–45. Blackmore, S. (1992). Psychic experiences: Psychic illusions.Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 367–376. Blake, P., & Moss, T. (1967). The development of socialization skills in an electively mute child.Journal of Behavioral Research and Therapy, 5, 349–356. Bligh, S., & Kupperman, P. (1992).Court accepts protocol for testing the validity of facilitated communication. Elmhurst, IL: Center for Speech and Language Disorders. Borthwick, C., Morton, M., Biklen, D., & Crossley, R. (1992).Severe communication impairment, facilitated communication, and disclosures of abuse. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Education, Facilitated Communication Institute. Bunge, M. (1984). What is pseudoscience?Skeptical Inquirer, 9, 36–49. Calculator, S. N., & Singer, K. M. (1992). Letter to the editor: Preliminary validation of facilitated communication.Topics in Language Disorders, 12(5), ix-xvi. Coon, D. J. (1992). Testing the limits of sense and science: American experimental psychologists combat spiritualism. 1880–1920.American Psychologist, 47, 143–151. Crossley, R. (1992). Getting the words out: Case studies in facilitated communication training.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 46–59. Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992). Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 29–45. Cummins, R., & Prior, M. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A reply to Biklen.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 228–241. DEAL Communication Centre. (1992a).Facilitated communication training. Caulfield, VA (AUST): Author. DEAL Communication Centre. (1992b).Getting the message. Caulfield, VA (AUST): Author. Druckman, D., & Swets, J. A. (Eds.). (1987).Enhancement of human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S., & Volpe, L. (in press). “Facilitated communication”: A failure to replicate the phenomenon.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Gilovich, T. (1991).How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York, NY: The Free Press. Green, G. (1992, October).Facilitated communication: Scientific and ethical issues. Waltham, MA: E. K. Shriver Center UAP Research Colloquium. Greenspoon, J. (1955). The reinforcing effect of spoken sounds on the frequency of two responses.American Journal of Psychology, 50, 409–416. Haskew, P., & Donnellan, A. M. (1992).Emotional maturity and well-being: Psychological lessons of facilitated communication. Danbury, CT: DRI Press. Hefferline, R. F., & Pererra, T. B. (1963). Proprioceptive discrimination of a covert operant without its observation by the subject.Science, 139, 834–835. Heward, W. L., & Cooper, J. O. (1992). Radical behaviorism: A productive and needed philosophy for education.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 345–365. Hineline, P. M., & Wancisen, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.),Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 221–268). New York, NY: Plenum. Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). Assessing the validity of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 165–173. Jacobson, J. W., Eberlin, M., Mulick, J. A., Schwartz, A. A., Szempruch, J., & Wheeler, D. L. (in press). Autism, facilitated communication, and future directions. In J. L. Matson (Ed.),Autism in Children and Adults: Etiology, assessment, and intervention. New York, NY: Brooks/Cole. Meinhold, P., Teodoru, J., & Koch, E. (1993, August).Clinical method for testing claims of facilitated communication. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada. Mulick, J. A., Jacobson, J. W., & Kobe, F. (1993). Anguished silence and helping hands: Autism and facilitated communication.Skeptical Inquirer, 17, 270–280. Mulick, J. A., & Meinhold, P. M. (in press). Developmental disorders and broad effects of the environment on learning and treatment effectiveness. In E. Schopler & G. R. Mesibov (Eds.),Assessment and management of behavior problems in children with autism. New York, NY: Plenum. National Public Radio. (1992, September 28). Discussion regarding facilitated communication with Douglas Biklen and Bernard Rimland.Talk of the Nation (radio broadcast). Padget, V. R., Benassi, V. A., & Singer, B. F. (1981). Belief in ESP among psychologists. In K. Frazier (Ed.),Paranormal borderlands of science (pp. 66–67). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. Prior, M., & Cummins, R. (1992). Questions about facilitated communication and autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22, 331–337. Rimland, B. (1992). Facilitated communication: What's going on?Autism Research Review International, 6(4), 2–3. Sabbagh, K. (1985–1986). The psychopathology of fringe science.Skeptical Inquirer, 10, 154–164. Schroeder, S. R., Mulick, J. A., & Rojahn, J. (1980). The definition, taxonomy, epidemiology, and ecology of self-injurious behavior.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 417–432. Shore, S. N. (1984). Quantum theory and the paranormal: The misuse of science.Skeptical Inquirer, 9, 24–35. Smith, M. D., & Belcher, R. G. (1993). Facilitated communication with adults with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 175–183. Spelt, D. (1948). The conditioning of the human fetus in utero.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 338–346. Szempruch, J., & Jacobson, J. W. (1993). Evaluating the facilitated communications of people with developmental disabilities.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 253–264. Tarnowski, K. J., Mulick, J. A., & Rasnake, L. K. (1990). Acceptability of behavioral interventions for self-injurious behavior: Replication and interinstitutional comparison.American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 182–187. Verplanck, W. S. (1992). Verbal concept “mediators” as simple operants.The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 45–68. Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.Mental Retardation, 31, 49–59. Wilmot, W. W. (1980).Dyadic communication (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wolfensberger, W. (1992). The facilitated communication craze: The cold fusion of human services.TIPS (Training Institute Publication Series),12(2/3), 39–46.