Fabrication of Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis Framework - CAD/CAM as a Key Player
Tóm tắt
To know the importance of CAD/CAM in the fabrication of implant retained prosthesis framework Review of the studies showing the fit of the implant prosthesis framework fabricated by CAD/CAM Initially, CAD/CAM was used to fabricate implant components from titanium and titanium alloy. To date, CAD/CAM is the only way of producing implant components from high-strength ceramics such as densely sintered alumina and partially stabilized zirconia. The accuracy can be measured by vertical fit of CAD/CAM frameworks ranged from 1 to 27μm which was significantly better than cast implant frameworks. In addition, a similar level of fit was observed for implant CAD/CAM frameworks produced from zirconia and titanium. CAD/CAM produces zirconia workpieces that require no subsequent alteration, unnecessary weakening is avoided. This ensures durability of the prosthesis. Maximal abutment and framework thickness is desirable and increases the fracture resistance. The risk of veneering ceramic fracture is expected to be minimized in the future by the continuously improving veneering strategies. In comparison to the lost wax/casting protocol, CAD/CAM is much simpler and requires less technical time and involvement. The whole CAD/CAM process is fully automated following the scanning step. CAD/CAM plays a key role in fabrication of implant prosthesis framework because of bypassing most of the laboratory works and manual handling. By using CAD/CAM frameworks, fixed partial or full-arch dental prostheses can be fabricated. Application of CAD/CAM is cost effective as well as less chair-side adjustments required especially with prosthesis requiring frameworks.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abduo J, Lyons K. Rationale for the use of CAD/CAM technology in implant prosthodontics. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:768121. doi: 10.1155/2013/768121. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Vult von Steyern P, Jonsson O, Nilner K. Five year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three ï¼unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 379-384
Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int I Prosthodont 2003;16: 150-156
Suarez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martinez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 35-38
Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of Lithia disilicatebased core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 469-475
Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 450-456
Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in ï¼vitvo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 45-61
Filser F, Kocher P, Weibe F, Luthy H, Scharer P, Gauckler LJ. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent 2001; 4: 89-106
Besimo CE, Spielmann HP, Rohner HP. Computerassisted generation of all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Int J Comput Dent 2001; 4: 43-62
Suttor D, Bunke K, Hoescheler S, Hauptmann H, Hertlein G. LAVA-the system for all-ceramic ZrO2 crowns and bridge frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 2001; 4: 195-206
Takashi MIYAZAKI, Yasuhiro HOTTA, Jun KUN II, Soichi KURIYAMA and Yukimichi TAMAKI A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental Materials Journal 2009; 28(1):44-56
Drago C, Saldarriaga RL, Domagala D, Almasri R. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):920-9.
Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Rotkina L, Zbären C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):165-74.
Hassel AJ, Shahin R, Kreuter A, Rammelsberg P. Rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using an all-ceramic framework: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2008 May;39(5):421-6.
Zaghloul HH, Younis JF. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Aug;39(4):417-24.
Dittmer MP, Nensa M, Stiesch M, Kohorst P. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jul-Aug;21(4):307-13.
Abduo J, Bennani V, Lyons K, Waddell N, Swain M. A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):658-63.
Spazzin AO, Dos Santos MB, Sobrinho LC, Consani RL, Mesquita MF. Effects of horizontal misfit and bar framework material on the stress distribution of an overdenture-retaining bar system: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20(7):517-22.
Turkyilmaz I, Asar NV A technique for fabricating a milled titanium complete-arch framework using a new CAD/CAM software and scanner with laser probe. Tex Dent J. 2013 Jul;130(7):586-92.
Takaba M, Tanaka S, Ishiura Y, Baba K. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework. J Prosthodont. 2013 Jul;22(5):402-7.
Ilser Turkyilmaz and Roxanna J. Nicoll State-of-the-Art Technology in Implant Dentistry: CAD/CAM www.intechopen.com 219-250