FDA Drug Approval Summary: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) as Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

Oncologist - Tập 14 Số 11 - Trang 1131-1138 - 2009
Martin H. Cohen1, Yuan Li Shen1, Patricia Keegan1, Richard Pazdur1
1Division of Biological Oncology Products, Office of Oncology Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Learning Objectives

After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Discuss and compare currently approved drugs for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and explain the advantages of bevacizumab for GBM treatment.Debate the use of response rate as an endpoint for GBM treatment with bevacizumab.Differentiate between accelerated and regular drug approval by the Food and Drug Administration.

This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com.

On May 5, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to bevacizumab injection (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) as a single agent for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with progressive disease following prior therapy. The approval was based on durable objective responses (independent radiologic review with stable or decreasing corticosteroid use). Two trials evaluating bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg by i.v. infusion every 2 weeks, were submitted. One trial also randomized patients to bevacizumab plus irinotecan treatment. All patients had received prior surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. Patients with active brain hemorrhage were excluded. One trial enrolled 78 independently confirmed GBM patients. Partial responses were observed in 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.0%–36.1%) of the patients. The median response duration was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0–5.7 months). The second trial enrolled 56 GBM patients. Partial responses were observed in 19.6% (95% CI, 10.9%–31.3%) of the patients. The median response duration was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.4–17.4 months). Safety data were provided for the first study. The most frequently reported bevacizumab adverse events of any grade were infection, fatigue, headache, hypertension, epistaxis, and diarrhea. Grade 3–5 bevacizumab-related adverse events included bleeding/hemorrhage, central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage, hypertension, venous and arterial thromboembolic events, wound-healing complications, proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. The attribution of certain adverse events (e.g., CNS hemorrhage, wound-healing complications, and thromboembolic events) to either bevacizumab, underlying disease, or both could not be determined because of the single-arm, noncomparative study design.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Stupp, 2005, Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma, N Engl J Med, 352, 987, 10.1056/NEJMoa043330

Grossman, 2003, Phase III study comparing three cycles of infusional carmustine and cisplatin followed by radiation therapy with radiation therapy and concurrent carmustine in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394, J Clin Oncol, 21, 1485, 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.035

Yung, 2000, A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse, Br J Cancer, 83, 588, 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316

Wong, 1999, Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials, J Clin Oncol, 17, 2572, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2572

Parney, 2003, Current chemotherapy for glioblastoma, Cancer J, 9, 149, 10.1097/00130404-200305000-00003

Walker, 1978, Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial, J Neurosurg, 49, 333, 10.3171/jns.1978.49.3.0333

Brem, 1995, Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas. The Polymer-brain Tumor Treatment Group, Lancet, 345, 1008, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90755-6

Valtonen, 1997, Interstitial chemotherapy with carmustine- loaded polymers for high-grade gliomas: A randomized double-blind study, Neurosurgery, 41, 44, 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00011

Westphal, 2003, A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma, Neuro Oncol, 5, 79, 10.1093/neuonc/5.2.79

Newlands, 1997, Temozolomide: A review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials, Cancer Treat Rev, 23, 35, 10.1016/S0305-7372(97)90019-0

Brem, 1972, Tumor angiogenesis: A quantitative method for histologic grading, J Natl Cancer Inst, 48, 347

Salmaggi, 2003, Intracavitary VEGF, bFGF, IL-8, IL-12 levels in primary and recurrent malignant glioma, J Neurooncol, 62, 297, 10.1023/A:1023367223575

Vredenburgh, 2007, Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, J Clin Oncol, 25, 4722, 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2440

Bokstein, 2008, Treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan for recurrent high-grade glial tumors, Cancer, 112, 2267, 10.1002/cncr.23401

Buie, 2008, Bevacizumab: A treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, Ann Pharmacother, 42, 1486, 10.1345/aph.1L030

Kang, 2008, Irinotecan and bevacizumab in progressive primary brain tumors, an evaluation of efficacy and safety, J Neurooncol, 89, 113, 10.1007/s11060-008-9599-0

Wong, 2007, Taming glioblastoma: Targeting angiogenesis, J Clin Oncol, 25, 4705, 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1037

Ananthnarayan, 2008, Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment, J Neurooncol, 88, 339, 10.1007/s11060-008-9573-x

Macdonald, 1990, Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma, J Clin Oncol, 8, 1277, 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.7.1277

Pope, 2006, MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy, Neurology, 66, 1258, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208958.29600.87

Henson, 2005, MRI in treatment of adult gliomas, Lancet Oncol, 6, 167, 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01767-5

U.S. Food and Drug Administration., FDA Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) January 12, 1999 Meeting Minutes

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA Workshop Brain Cancer Endpoints January 16, 2006

Vos, 2003, Interobserver variability in the radiological assessment of response to chemotherapy in glioma, Neurology, 60, 826, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000049467.54667.92

Kreisl, 2009, Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma, J Clin Oncol, 27, 740, 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055

Schiff, 2008, Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, Nat Clin Pract Oncol, 5, 186, 10.1038/ncponc1077

Wong, 2008, Bevacizumab reverses cerebral radiation necrosis, J Clin Oncol, 26, 5649, 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1866

Gonzalez, 2007, Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 67, 323, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.010

Norden, 2008, Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: Efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence, Neurology, 70, 779, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304121.57857.38

Federal Register, 21 CFR 314.500 and 601.40