Chuyển Động Mắt, Cấu Trúc Huấn Luyện và Hình Thành Lớp Tương Đương Kích Thích

Arntzen, E. (2011). Comments on sidman’s remarks. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 351–353 Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/. Arntzen, E. (2012). Training and testing parameters in formation of stimulus equivalence: Methodological issues. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 123–135 Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/. Arntzen, E., & Hansen, S. (2011). Training structures and the formation of equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 483–503 Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50, 603–628 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Arntzen, E., & Vaidya, M. (2008). The effect of baseline training structure on equivalence class formation in children. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 29, 1–8 Retrieved from http://www.eahb.org/NewSitePages/BulletinHomepage.htm. Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and the subsequent performance on the tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60, 437–462 Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=tpr. Arntzen, E., Braaten, L. F., Lian, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2011). Response-to-sample requirements in conditional discrimination procedures. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 505–522 Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/. Arntzen, E., Petursson, P., Sadeghi, P., & Eilifsen, C. (2014). Equivalence class formation in accuracy or speed conditions: Immediate emergence, adduction, and retention. The Psychological Record, 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0097-9. Dymond, S., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2001). Supplemental measures of derived stimulus relations. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 19, 8–12. Eilifsen, C., & Arntzen, E. (2009). On the role of trial types in tests for stimulus equivalence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 187–202 Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/. Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317. Fields, L., Hobbie-Reeve, S. A., Adams, B. J., & Reeve, K. F. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/. Guinther, P. M., & Dougher, M. J. (2015). The clinical relevance of stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory in influencing the behavior of verbally competent adults. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.015. Hansen, S., & Arntzen, E. (2015). Fixating, attending, and observing: A behavior analytic eye-movement analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2015.1090750. Hayhoe, M. M. (2004). Advances in relating eye movements and cognition. Infancy, 6, 267–274. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f30/f2406aca149c8d5d83a93da9b00d62f70853.pdf Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Holth, P., & Arntzen, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81–110 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Holth, P., & Arntzen, E. (2000). Reaction times and the emergence of class consistent responding: A case for precurrent responding? The Psychological Record, 50, 305–338 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Hooge, I., & Camps, G. (2013). Scan path entropy and arrow plots: Capturing scanning behavior of multiple observers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00996. Huziwara, E. M., Silva, M. J. M., Perez, W. F., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2015). Analyzing the stimulus control acquisition in simple discrimination tasks through eye movement. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(3), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528319. Kirshner, H., & Sidman, M. (1972). Scanning patterns in aphasic patients during matching-to-sample tests. Neuropsychologia, 10(2), 179–1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(72)90057-7. Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (2000). Stimulus equivalence and unit of analysis. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 111–126). Reno: Context Press. Palmer, D. C. (2010). Behavior under the microscope: Increasing the resolution of our experimental procedures. The. Behavior Analyst, 33(1), 37–45 Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/TBA.asp. Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117. Saunders, R. R., & McEntee, J. E. (2004). Increasing the probability of stimulus equivalence with adults with mild mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 423–435 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Saunders, K. J., Saunders, R. R., Williams, D. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/index.html. Saunders, R. R., Drake, K. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.71-195. Saunders, R. R., Chaney, L., & Marquis, J. G. (2005). Equivalence class establishment with two-, three-, and four-choice matching to sample by senior citizens. The Psychological Record, 55, 539–559 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siuc.edu/. Steingrimsdottir, H. S., & Arntzen, E. (2016). Eye movements during conditional discrimination training. The Psychological Record, 66(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0156-x. Sidman, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, Nevada: Context Press. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2005). Establishing equivalence classes in preschool children with one-to-many and many-to-one training protocols. Behavioural Processes, 69, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.12.009. Spencer, T. J., & Chase, P. N. (1996). Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(3), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-643.