Extending Survival with Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Oncologist - Tập 10 Số S3 - Trang 20-29 - 2005
Joyce O’Shaughnessy1
1Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Learning Objectives

After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Identify trials that have demonstrated a survival benefit with a modern chemotherapeutic agent or regimen in MBC.Summarize recent findings of randomized trials showing survival benefits with targeted therapy–chemotherapy combinations in MBC.Discuss quality-of-life findings and their implications in clinical practice.

Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, and goals of therapy include the palliation of symptoms, delay of disease progression, and prolongation of overall survival time without negatively impacting quality of life. Anthracycline and taxane-based therapies have traditionally shown the highest degree of activity in MBC. Though numerous randomized clinical trials have shown improvements in overall response rates, few have found clear survival benefits. In recent years, however, there has been a small but growing series of clinical trials demonstrating modest, but meaningful survival advantages in metastatic disease. A common feature in many of these trials has been the use of a taxane, and more recently, a taxane combined with an antimetabolite. In addition, the development of targeted biologic agents active against MBC, such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab, has demonstrated great potential for enhancing the effects of chemotherapy and producing meaningful survival improvements. The role of the taxanes, antimetabolites, and biologics in extending survival in MBC is discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Cancer Society, 2005, Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, 9

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program

Gralow, 2005, Optimizing the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 89, S9, 10.1007/s10549-005-0143-z

Blum, 1999, Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 17, 485, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.485

Blum, 2001, Capecitabine (Xeloda) in 162 patients with paclitaxel-pretreated MBC: updated results and analysis of dose modification, Eur J Cancer, 37, S190a, 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)81185-0

Blum, 2001, Multicenter, phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients, Cancer, 92, 1759, 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1759::AID-CNCR1691>3.0.CO;2-A

Reichardt, 2001, Capecitabine: the new standard in metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline and taxane containing chemotherapy? Mature results of a large multicenter phase II trail, Eur J Cancer, 37, S191a, 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)81191-6

Fumoleau, 2001, Phase II study of capecitabine (Xeloda®) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 69, 285a

Miles, 2002, Combination versus sequential single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer, The Oncologist, 7, 13, 10.1634/theoncologist.2002-0013

Sledge, 2003, Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193), J Clin Oncol, 21, 588, 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.013

Cresta, 2004, A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 15, 433, 10.1093/annonc/mdh107

Conte, 2004, Concomitant versus sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in meta-static breast carcinoma: results for the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest randomized trial, Cancer, 101, 704, 10.1002/cncr.20400

Alba, 2004, Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM-9903) phase III study, J Clin Oncol, 22, 2587, 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.125

Slamon, 2001, Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2, N Engl J Med, 344, 783, 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101

Marty, 2005, Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive meta-static breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group, J Clin Oncol, 23, 4265, 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.173

Miller, 2004, E2100: a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, Presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Greenberg, 1996, Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 14, 2197, 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.8.2197

Fossati, 1998, Cytotoxic and hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of published randomized trials involving 31,510 women, J Clin Oncol, 16, 3439, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3439

Pierga, 2001, Response to chemotherapy is a major parameter influencing long-term survival of metastatic breast cancer patients, Ann Oncol, 12, 231, 10.1023/A:1008330527188

Bruzzi, 2005, Objective response to chemotherapy as a potential surrogate end point of survival in metastatic breast cancer patients, J Clin Oncol, 23, 5117, 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.106

Chia, 2003, The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents on the survival of women with metastatic breast cancer in a population based cohort, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 22, 6

Nabholtz, 1999, Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with meta-static breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group, J Clin Oncol, 17, 1413, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1413

Jones, 2005, Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 23, 5542, 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.027

O'shaughnessy, 2002, Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results, J Clin Oncol, 20, 2812, 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.002

Albain, 2004, Global phase III study of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (T) as frontline therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): first report of overall survival, J Clin Oncol, 22, 5s, 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.510

O'shaughnessy, 2003, Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel (T) as first-line treatment for anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): interim results of a global phase III study, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 22, 7

Bishop, 1999, Initial paclitaxel improves outcome compared with CMFP combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in untreated metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 17, 2355, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2355

Bontenbal, 2003, Phase II study comparing AT to FAC as first line chemotherapy in patients with MBC, Eur J Cancer, 1, S201, 10.1016/S1359-6349(03)90702-6

Jassem, 2001, Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial, J Clin Oncol, 19, 1707, 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1707

Feher, 2005, First-line gemcitabine versus epirubicin in postmenopausal women aged 60 or older with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study, Ann Oncol, 16, 899, 10.1093/annonc/mdi181

Perez, 1998, Paclitaxel in breast cancer, The Oncologist, 3, 373, 10.1634/theoncologist.3-6-373

Figgitt, 2000, Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer, Drugs, 59, 621, 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00015

Sjöström, 1999, Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group, Eur J Cancer, 35, 1194, 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00122-7

Bonneterre, 2002, Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure, Br J Cancer, 87, 1210, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600645

Gradishar, 2005, Superior efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel, ABI-007, compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase III trial, J Clin Oncol, 23, 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.937

Miles, 2004, Survival benefit with capecitabine/docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: analysis of therapy in a randomized phase III trial, Clin Breast Cancer, 5, 273, 10.3816/CBC.2004.n.030

Moinpour, 2004, Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel (T) as first-line treatment for anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): quality of life (QoL) and pain palliation results from the global phase III study, J Clin Oncol, 2222, 621, 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.621

Chan, 1999, Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 8, 2341, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2341

Paridaens, 2000, Paclitaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized study with cross-over, J Clin Oncol, 18, 724, 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.4.724

Nabholtz, 2003, Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter phase III trial, J Clin Oncol, 21, 968, 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.040

Mackey, 2002, Final results of the phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel (T) doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) to FAC as first line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 21, 35a

Biganzoli, 2002, Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 multicenter phase III trial, J Clin Oncol, 20, 3114, 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.005

Carmichael, 2001, UKCCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and Taxol (ET) in the first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 20, 22

Lück, 2000, Multicentric phase III study in first line treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Epirubicin/paclitaxel (ET) vs epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). A study of the AGO Breast Cancer Group, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 19, 73a

Pegram, 2004, Rational combinations of trastuzumab with chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 739, 10.1093/jnci/djh131

Osoba, 2002, Effects on quality of life of combined trastuzumab and chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 20, 3106, 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.090

Jain, 2005, Antiangiogenic therapy of cancer: current and emerging concepts, Oncology, 19, 7

Kim, 1993, Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumour growth in vivo, Nature, 362, 841, 10.1038/362841a0

Cobleigh, 2003, A phase II dose-escalation trial of bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic breast cancer, Semin Oncol, 30, 117, 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2003.08.013

Miller, 2005, Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients, J Clin Oncol, 23, 792, 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.098