Extending EPANET hydraulic solver capacity with rigid water column global gradient algorithm

Ahmed, 1997 Ahmed, 1999, Analysis of unsteady flow in networks using a gradient algorithm based method, 1 Avesani, 2012, The extension of EPANET source code to simulate unsteady flow in water distribution networks with variable head tanks, J. Hydroinf., 14, 960, 10.2166/hydro.2012.013 Axworthy, 1997 Axworthy, 2000, Valve closure in graph-theoretical models for slow transient network analysis, J. Hydraul. Eng., 126, 304, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:4(304) Boulos, 2006 Cardoso, 2021, Optimal sensor placement for contamination detection: a multi-objective and probabilistic approach, Environ. Modell. Software, 135, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104896 Davis, 1969 Diao, 2014, Speedup of water distribution simulation by domain decomposition, Environ. Modell. Software, 52, 253, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.025 Elhay, 2016, A robust, rapidly convergent method that solves the water distribution equations for pressure-dependent models, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 142, 04015047, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000578 Factors Influencing Flow in Large Conduits, 1965, Journal of Hydraulics Division ASCE. Giustolisi, 2008, Pressure-driven demand and leakage simulation for water distribution networks, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134, 626, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(626) Giustolisi, 2012, Generalizing WDN simulation models to variable tank levels, J. Hydroinf., 14, 562, 10.2166/hydro.2011.224 Holloway, 1985 Iglesias-Rey, 2017, Extending EPANET capabilities with add-in tools, Procedia Eng., 186, 626, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.279 Islam, 1998, Modeling of constituent transport in unsteady flows in pipe networks, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124, 1115, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:11(1115) Jovic, 2013 Karney, 1984 Karney, 1992, Efficient calculation of transient flow in simple pipe networks, J. Hydraul. Eng., 118, 1014, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:7(1014) Karney, 1985, Charts for water hammer in pipelines resulting from valve closure from full opening only, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 12, 241, 10.1139/l85-027 Koşucu, 2022, Smart pressure management extension for EPANET: source code enhancement with a dynamic pressure reducing valve model, J. Hydroinf. (accepted), 1–17 Koşucu, M.M., 2021. EPANET RWC GGA EXTENSION. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5105780. Kovalenko, 2014, Convergence of a hydraulic solver with pressure-dependent demands, Water Resour. Manage., 28, 1013, 10.1007/s11269-014-0531-4 Mays, 2000 Nault, 2017 Nault, 2016, Improved rigid water column formulation for simulating slow transients and controlled operations, J. Hydraul. Eng., 142, 04016025, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001145 Nault, 2016, Adaptive hybrid transient formulation for simulating incompressible pipe network hydraulics, J. Hydraul. Eng., 142, 04016050, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001195 Nault, 2018, Generalized flexible method for simulating transient pipe network hydraulics, J. Hydraul. Eng., 144, 04018031, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001432 Novak, 2007 Onizuka, 1986, System dynamics approach to pipe network analysis, J. Hydraul. Eng., 112, 728, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:8(728) Ormsbee, 2006, The history of water distribution network analysis: the computer age, Water Distrib. Syst. Anal. Symposium, 2006, 1 Rossman, 1993, The EPANET Water Quality Model Rossman, 2020, EPANET 2.2 User Manual Rossman, L.A., 1994. Epanet User’s Manual. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Rossman, L.A., 2000. Epanet 2 Users’ Manual. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Rossman, L.A., 2010. An overview of EPANET version 3.0, in: Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2010 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, WDSA 2010. pp. 14–18. doi:10.1061/41203(425)3. Salgado-Castro, 1988 Sela, 2019, Plugin prototyping for the EPANET software, Environ. Modell. Software, 119, 49, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.010 Sevuk, 1979, Steady and unsteady flow simulation in pipe networks, Adv. Eng. Softw., 1, 107, 10.1016/0141-1195(79)90031-7 Seyoum, 2016, Investigation into the Pressure-Driven Extension of the EPANET Hydraulic Simulation Model for Water Distribution Systems, Water Resour. Manage., 30, 5351, 10.1007/s11269-016-1492-6 Shimada, 1989, Graph-theoretical model for slow transient analysis of pipe networks, J. Hydraul. Eng., 115, 1165, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:9(1165) Shimada, 1992, State-space analysis and control of slow transients in pipes, J. Hydraul. Eng., 118, 1287, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1287) Siew, 2012, Pressure-Dependent EPANET Extension, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 1477, 10.1007/s11269-011-9968-x Tanyimboh, 2010, Seamless pressure-deficient water distribution system model, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Water Manage., 163, 389 Todini, 2003, A more realistic approach to the “extended period simulation” of water distribution networks, 173 Todini, 2011, Extending the global gradient algorithm to unsteady flow extended period simulations of water distribution systems, J. Hydroinf., 13, 167, 10.2166/hydro.2010.164 Todini, 1988, A gradient algorithm for the analysis of pipe networks, 1 Todini, 2013, Unified framework for deriving simultaneous equation algorithms for water distribution networks, J. Hydraul. Eng., 139, 511, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000703 Tullis, 1989 Watters, 1979 Wood, 1973, Water-Hammer Charts for Various Types of Valves, J. the Hydraul. Div., 99, 167, 10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003550 Wood, 2005, Numerical methods for modeling transient flow in distribution systems, J. Am. Water Works Assn., 97, 104, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2005.tb10936.x Yan, 2019, A simple but robust convergence trajectory controlled method for pressure driven analysis in water distribution system, Sci. Total Environ., 659, 983, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.374