Extended producer responsibility’s effect on producers’ electronic waste management practices in Japan and Canada: drivers, barriers, and potential of the urban mine
Tóm tắt
Electronic waste is the fastest-growing domestic waste stream globally, continuously outstripping projections. With increasing ubiquity of complex computing, many non-renewables are contained in end-of-life electronics, creating a vast urban mine, potentially hazardous, depending on treatment. The aim of this study is to compare how Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policy is applied in two case countries, Japan and Canada, the practical implications of EPR policy design on producer operations, and how EPR affects electronic waste management improvements in each case. These cases share international obligations for electronic waste management but employ contrasting EPR policies. These policies are widespread in both cases, yet are not presided over by larger, regional obligations. Therefore, country-level interviews with electronic waste management stakeholders focusing on how EPR regulation affects producer practice were conducted. The physical application of EPR, as seen in Japan, drives design changes by producers intending to simplify downstream treatment, while financial responsibility in Canada, creates greater concern with cost-savings for producers, complicating end-of-life processing. EPR implementation, along with specific geographical factors, also create contrasting resource recovery results between countries. Regulation primarily drives EPR implementation in both countries, which is consistent with the literature. This study presents new drivers and barriers, namely pre-emptive legislation, and no incentive to improve, classifying the Japanese and Canadian systems as suffering from externalities on an insular system, and lack of harmonization, respectively. This research addresses a gap in comparative studies across regions of physical and financial EPR effects on producer practice.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Forti V, Baldé CP, Kuehr R, Bel G. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) – co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam.
Menikpura SN, Santo A, Hotta Y. Assessing the climate co-benefits from Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) recycling in Japan. J Clean Prod. 2014;74:183–90.
Motoori R, et al. Resource security strategies and their environmental and economic implications: a case study of copper production in Japan. Energies. 2019;12(15):3021.
Corsini F, Rizzi F, Frey M. Extended producer responsibility: the impact of organizational dimensions on WEEE collection from households. Waste Manage. 2017;59:23–9.
Rau H, Bisnar A, Velasco J. Physical responsibility versus financial responsibility of producers for e-wastes. Sustainability. 2020;12:4037.
Lindhqvist T, Lidgren K. Model for Extended Producer Responsibility: in Ministry of the Environment, From the Cradle to the Grave–six studies of the environmental impacts of products. Ministry of Environment, Stockholm. 1990:7–44.
Hilton M, et al. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and the Impact of Online Sales", OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 142. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/cde28569-en.
Xavier LH, Ottoni M, Lepawsky J. Circular economy and e-waste management in the Americas: Brazilian and Canadian frameworks. J Clean Prod. 2021;297: 126570.
Andersen T. A comparative study of national variations of the European WEEE directive: manufacturer’s view. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(14):19920–39.
Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manage. 2011;31(4):714–30.
Shittu OS, Williams ID, Shaw PJ. Global e-waste management: can WEEE make a difference? A review of e-waste trends, legislation, contemporary issues and future challenges. Waste Manag. 2021;120:549–63.
Gupt Y, Sahay S. Review of extended producer responsibility: a case study approach. Waste Manag Res. 2015;33(7):595–611.
Evans R, Vermeulen WJ. Governing electronics sustainability: Meta-evaluation of explanatory factors influencing modes of governance applied in the electronics value chain. J Clean Prod. 2021;278: 122952.
Yu J, Hills P, Welford R. Extended producer responsibility and eco-design changes: perspectives from China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2008;15(2):111–24.
Zheng X, Xu F, Feng L. Analysis of driving factors for extended producer responsibility by using interpretative structure modelling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). Sustainability. 2017;9(4):540.
Kumar A, Dixit G. Evaluating critical barriers to implementation of WEEE management using DEMATEL approach. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;131:101–21.
Mihai F, et al. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): flows, quantities, and management—a global scenario. 2019. p. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816190-6.00001-7
Sugimura Y, Murakami S. Problems in Japan’s governance system related to end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment trade. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2016;112:93–106.
Chi X, et al. Informal electronic waste recycling: a sector review with special focus on China. Waste Manag. 2011;31(4):731–42.
Cotta B. What goes around, comes around? Access and allocation problems in Global North-South waste trade. Int Environ Agreem. 2020;20(2):255–69.
Wang K, Qian JX, Liu LX. Understanding environmental pollutions of informal e-waste clustering in global south via multi-scalar regulatory frameworks: a case study of Guiyu Town, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2808.
Bisschop L. How E-waste challenges environmental governance. In: Hazardous Waste and Pollution. Springer; 2016. p. 27–43.
Nanjo M. Urban mine, new resources for the year 2,000 and beyond. Tohoku Daigaku Senko Seiren Kenkyusho Iho;(Japan). 1988;43(2).
Compagnoni M. Is Extended Producer Responsibility living up to expectations? A systematic literature review focusing on electronic waste. J Clean Prod. 2022;367: 133101.
Atasu A. Operational perspectives on extended producer responsibility. J Ind Ecol. 2019;23(4):744–50.
Deviatkin I, et al. Implementation of circular economy strategies within the electronics sector: insights from finnish companies. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3268.
McKerlie K, Knight N, Thorpe B. Advancing Extended Producer Responsibility in Canada. J Clean Prod. 2006;14(6):616–28.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1967.
Flick U. Doing interview research: the essential how to guide. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2021.
Haig BD. Grounded theory as scientific method. Philosophy of Education 1995 (Current Issues). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 1996:281–90.
Gubrium J. et al. The SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft, 2nd edn. Sage Publications; 2012. pp. 1–570.
Leclerc SH, Badami MG. Extended producer responsibility for E-waste management: policy drivers and challenges. J Clean Prod. 2020;251:119657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119657
Stewart A. Case study. In: Qualitative methodology: a practical guide. 55 City Road, London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163
Zoeteman B, Krikke HRR, Venselaar J. Handling Electronic Waste Flows: On the Effectiveness of Producer Responsibility in a Globalizing World (September 13, 2009). CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2009-74. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1476332 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476332
Buchholz RA, Rosenthal SB. Stakeholder theory and public policy: how governments matter. J Bus Ethics. 2004;51(2):143–53.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. 1998; xiii, 312-xiii, 312.
Yoshida A, Tasaki T, Terazono A. Material flow analysis of used personal computers in Japan. Waste Manag. 2009;29(5):1602–14.
Lee S-C, Na S-I. E-waste recycling systems and sound circulative economies in east Asia: a comparative analysis of systems in Japan, South Korea China and Taiwan. Sustainability. 2010;2(6):1632–44.
Ministry of the Environment. History and Current State of Waste Management in Japan, In: J.E.S. Center, Editor. Office of Sound Material-Cycle Society, Policy Planning Division, Waste Management and Recycling Department, Minister’s Secretariat. Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment. 2014; p. 31.
Hotta Y, Santo A, Tasaki T, EPR-Based electronic home appliance recycling system under home appliance recycling act of Japan. 2014. https://www.oecd.org/environment/waste/EPR_Japan_HomeAppliance.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2023.
Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI)—Joint Press Release with the Ministry of the Environment. Current state of enforcement of the act on recycling of specified kinds of home appliances (collection results) and results of recycling efforts by home appliance manufacturers (FY2021 Results), July 1st, 2022. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2022/0701_002.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.
Nakano K, Aoki R, Yagita H, et al. Evaluating the reduction in green house gas emissions achieved by the implementation of the household appliance recycling in Japan. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2007;12:289. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.11.281
Environment Canada. Promoting sustainable materials management through extended producer responsibility: Canadian Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Case Study, In: C.C.E. Canada, editor, Prepared for the OECD Global Forum on Environment: Promoting Sustainable Materials Management Through Extended Producer Responsibility-19 June 2014, Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Environment Canada; 2014
Government of Ontario. Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, in S.O. 2016, c.12, Sched. 1, G.o. Ontario, Editor. 2016, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016.
Union E. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Off J Eur Union. 2012;197(55):38–71.
Khan SA. E-products, e-waste and the basel convention: regulatory challenges and impossibilities of international environmental law. RECIEL. 2016;25(2):248–60.
Terazono A, et al. Current status and research on e-waste issues in Asia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2006;8(1):1–12.
Micheaux H, Aggeri F. Eco-modulation as a driver for eco-design: a dynamic view of the French collective EPR scheme. J Clean Prod. 2021;289: 125714.
Hotta Y, Visvanathan C, Kojima M. Recycling rate and target setting: challenges for standardized measurement. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage. 2016;18(1):14–21.
Huang X, Atasu A, Toktay LB. Design implications of extended producer responsibility for durable products. Manag Sci. 2019;65(6):2573–90.
Amemiya T. Current state and trend of waste and recycling in Japan. Int J Earth Environ Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-351X/2018/155.
Lepawsky J. The changing geography of global trade in electronic discards: time to rethink the e-waste problem. Geogr J. 2015;181(2):147–59.
Amankwah-Amoah J. Global business and emerging economies: towards a new perspective on the effects of e-waste. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2016;105:20–6.
Aizawa H, Yoshida H, Sakai S-I. Current results and future perspectives for Japanese recycling of home electrical appliances. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2008;52(12):1399–410.