Exploring the Use of Individualized, Reflective Guidance In an Educational Multi-User Virtual Environment

American Association of University Women (2000) Tech-savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC

Anderson J. R., Corbett A., Koedinger K. R., Pelletier R. (1995) Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2):167–207

Barab S., Arici A., Jackson C. (2005a) Eat your vegetables and do your homework: a design-based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology 45(1):15–20

Barab S., Thomas M., Dodge T., Carteaux R., Tuzan H. (2005b) Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development 53(1):86–107

Barab, S., Sadler, T., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., and Zuiker, S. (this issue) Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology.

Baylor A. (2000) Beyond butlers: Intelligent agents as mentors. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22(4):373–382

Bers, M. U. (1999). Zora: a Graphical Multi-user Environment to Share Stories about the Self. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL’99)

Bers M. U., Cassell J. (1998) Interactive storytelling systems for children: Using technology to explore language and identity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9(2):183–215

Bielaczyc K., Collins A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: a reconceptualization of educational practice. In: C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ. pp. 269–292

Bowers A. (1987) Creative C.O.W. or a Moo Is Worth a Thousand Words. Pointer 32(1):9–13

Brdicka, B. (1999). Multi User Virtual Environment and Its Possible Use in Education. Retrieved 9/28, 2003, from http://it.pedf.cuni.cz/∼bobr/MUVE/muveen.htm

Brown J. S., Collins A., Duguid P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18:32

Bruckman, A. (1994). Programming for Fun: MUDs as a Context for Collaborative Learning. Paper presented at the Recreating the Revolution. Proceedings of the Annual National Educational Computing Conference (15th, Boston, Massachusetts, June 13–15, 1994); see IR 017 841

Bruckman A. (1996) Finding one’s own space in cyberspace. Technology Review 99(1):48–54

Bruckman, A. (2000) Uneven Achievement in a Constructivist Learning Environment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI

Bruckman, A., Jensen, C., and DeBonte, A. (2002). Gender and Programming Achievement in a CSCL Environment. Paper presented at the CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO

Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and Evaluation of a Student-Centered Learning Unit: A Case Study. Educational Technology Research & Development 48(3): 79–100.

Clarke J., Dede C., Ketelhut D. J., Nelson B. (2006) A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology 46(3):27–36

Corbit, M. and DeVarco, B. (2000). SciCentr and BioLearn: Two 3D Implementations of CVE Science Museums. Paper presented at the The Third International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, San Francisco

Dalgarno B. (2001) Interpretations of constructivism and consequences for Computer Assisted Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(2):183–194

Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., and Reuss, K. (2003) Motivation, Usability, and Learning Outcomes in a Prototype Museum-based Multi-User Virtual Environment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Dede, C., Nelson, B., and Ketelhut, D. J. (2004) Design-Based Research on Gender, Class, Race, and Ethnicity in a Multi-User Virtual Environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA

Dennen V. P. (2003) Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In: D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc

Falsetti, J. (1995) What the Heck is a MOO? And What’s the Story with All Those Cows? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (29th, Long Beach, CA, March 26-April 1, 1995)

Fanderclai T. L. (1995) MUDs in education: New environments, new pedagogies. Computer Mediated Education Magazine 2(1):8

Fraser B. (1981) TORSA: Test of Science Related Attitudes. Hawthorne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research

Hannafin M. J., Hannafin K. M., Land S. M., Oliver K. (1997) Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development 45(3):101–117

Hickey D. T., Wolfe, Kindfield A. C. H. (1999) Assessing learning in a technology-supported genetics environment: evidential and systemic validity issues. Educational Assessment 6(3):155–196

Horwitz P., Christie M. (1999) Hypermodels: embedding curriculum and assessment in computer-based manipulatives. Journal of Education 181(2):1–23

Horwitz P., Christie M. (2000) Computer-based manipulatives for teaching scientific reasoning: An example. In: R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Learning the Sciences of the Twenty-First Century: Theory, Research, and the Design of Advanced Technology learning environments. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates

Johnson W. L., Rickel J., Stiles R., Munro A. (1998) Integrating Pedagogical Agents into Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(6):523–546

Johnson W. L., Rickel J. W., Lester J. C. (2000) Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11:47–78

Jonassen D. H. (1991) Objectivism versus Constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research & Development 39(3):5–14

Jonassen D. H. (1994) Thinking technology: toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology 34(4):34–37

Jonassen D. H. (1999a) Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 217–239

Jonassen D. H. (1999b) Designing constructivist learning environments. In: C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp. 217–240

Jonassen D. H., Peck K. L., Wilson B. G. (1999) Learning With Technology: a Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

Jonassen D. H., Wilson B. G., Wang S., Grabinger R. S. (1993) Constructivist Uses of Expert Systems to Support Learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(3):86–94

Ketelhut, D. J. (2004). Assessing Science Self-Efficacy in a Virtual Environment: A Measurement Pilot. Unpublished Qualifying Paper, Harvard, Cambridge, MA

Kirschner P. A., Sweller J., Clark R. E. (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2):75–86

Lave J., Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Luck M., Aylett R. (2000) Applying artificial intelligence to virtual reality: Intelligent virtual environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence14:3–32

Mayer R. E. (2004) Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. Educational Psychologist, 59:14–19

Mory E. H. (2003) Feedback research revisited In: D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc

Midgley C., Maehr M. L., Hruda L. Z., Anderman E., Anderman L., Freeman K. E., Gheen M., Kaplan A., Kumar R., Middleton M. J., Nelson J., Roeser R., Urdan T. (2000) Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan

Nelson B., Ketelhut D. J., Clarke J., Bowman C., Dede C. (2005) Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual enviroment. Educational Technology 45(1):21–27

Nelson L. M.. (1999) Collaborative problem solving. In: C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 241–268

Perkins D. N. (1991) Technology meets constructivism: do they make a marriage? Educational Technology 31(5):18–23

Puntambekar S., Hübscher R. (2005) Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: what have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist 40(1):1–12

Rickel, J. and Johnson, W. L. (1997) Integrating pedagogical agents capabilities in a virtual environment agent. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Rickel J., Johnson W. L. (1999) Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: perception, cognition, and motor control. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13:343–382

Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(1):37–68

Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. (1994) Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3:265–283

Shute V. J., Psotka J. (1996) Intelligent tutoring systems: past, present, and future. In: D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York:MacMillan Library Reference USA

Slator B. M., Hill C., Del Val D. (2004) Teaching Computer Science With Virtual Worlds. IEEE Transactions on Education 47(2):269–275

Socially-Responsive Design Group (2004). Creating a Socially-Responsive Play Space for Learning: Something for Girls and Boys. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA

Subrahmanyam K., Greenfield P. M. (1998) Computer games for girls: what makes them play? In: J. Cassell, H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press pp. 46–71

Tuzan, H. (2004). Motivating Learners in Educational Computer Games. Indiana University, Bloomington

Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind In Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press