Exploring Monte Carlo Simulation Applications for Project Management
Tóm tắt
Monte Carlo simulation is a useful technique for modeling and analyzing real-world systems and situations. This paper is a conceptual paper that explores the applications of Monte Carlo simulation for managing project risks and uncertainties. The benefits of Monte Carlo simulation are using quantified data, allowing project managers to better justify and communicate their arguments when senior management is pushing for unrealistic project expectations. Proper risk management education, training, and advancements in computing technology combined with Monte Carlo simulation software allow project managers to implement the method easily. In the field of project management, Monte Carlo simulation can quantify the effects of risk and uncertainty in project schedules and budgets, giving the project manager a statistical indicator of project performance such as target project completion date and budget.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Balcombe, K. and Smith, L. (1999). Refining the User of Monte Carlo Techniques for Risk Analysis in Project Planning. The Journal of Development Studies. 36 (2), p. 113.
Berney, C. and Danuser, G. (2003). FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison. Biophysical Journal. 84 (6), p. 3992.
Bhanot, G., Gara, A., Heidelberger, P., Lawless, E., Sexton, J.C. and Walkup, R. (2005). Optimizing Task Layout on the Blue Gene/L Supercomputer. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 49 (2/3), p. 489.
Boinske, C. (2003). How Much Can I Spend? Journal of Financial Service Professionals. 57 (1), p. 33.
Button, S. (2003). Project Duration Prediction Using a Monte Carlo Simulation of the Periodic Output of the Project Resources. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications. 9 (3), p. 217.
Charette, N. (1996). Large-Scale Project Management is Risk Management. IEEE Software. 13 (4), pp. 110–117.
Cho, J.-G. and Yum, B.-J. (2004). Functional Estimation of Activity Criticality Indices and Sensitivity Analysis of Expected Project Completion Time. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 55 (8), p. 850.
Eckhardt, R. (1987). Stan Ulam, John von Neumann, and the Monte Carlo Method. Los Alamos Science. Special Issue (15), pp. 131–137.
El-Ramly, H., Morgenstern, N. and Cruden, R. (2002). Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis for Practice. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 39 (3), p. 665.
Gebremichael, M., Krajewski, W.F., Morrissey, M., Langerud, D., Huffman, G.J. and Adler, R. (2003). Error Uncertainty Analysis of GPCP Monthly Rainfall Products: A Data-Based Simulation Study. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 42 (12), p. 1837.
Gilchrist, A., Allouche, E. and Cowan, D. (2003). Prediction and Mitigation of Construction Noise in an Urban Environment. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 30 (4), p. 659.
Graves, R. (2001). Open and Closed: The Monte Carlo Model. PM Network. 15 (12), pp. 37–41.
Hahl, J., Simell, T., Kupila, A., Keskinen, P., Knip, M., Ilonon, J. and Simell, O. (2003). A Simulation Model for Estimating Direct Costs of Type 1 Diabetes Prevention. Pharmacoeconomics. 21 (5), p. 295.
Hurley, W. (1998). On the Use of Martingales in Monte Carlo Approaches to Multiperiod Parameter Uncertainty in Capital Investment Risk Analysis. The Engineering Economist. 43 (2), p. 169.
Javid, M. and Seneviratne, P. (2000). Investment Risk Analysis in Airport Parking Facility Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 126 (4), p. 298.
Korol, A.B., Ronin, Y.I., Nevo, E. and Hayes, P.M. (1998). Multi-Interval Mapping of Correlated Trait Complexes. Heredity. 80 (3), p. 273.
Kwak, Y.H. and Stoddard, J. (2004). Project Risk Management: Lessons Learned from Software Development Environment. Technovation: An International Journal of Technical Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Management. 24 (11), pp. 915–920.
LeBlanc, B., Braunschweig, B., Toulhoat, H. and Lutton, E. (2003). Improving the Sampling Efficiency of Monte Carlo Molecular Simulations: An Evolutionary Approach. Molecular Physics. 101 (22), p. 3293.
Lei, F., Ferguson, C., Bird, J.A., Lockley, J.J. and Dean, J.A. (1999). The INTEGRAL Mass Model – TIMM. Astrophysical Letters and Communications. 39 (1–6), p. 841.
Lorterapong, P. and Moselhi, O. (1996). Project-Network Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets Theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 122 (4), p. 308.
Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 44 (247), pp. 335–341.
Monte Carlo Method (2005). [Online]. [1 December 2005]. Available from World Wide Web: http://www.riskglossary.com/link/monte_carlo_method.htm.
Phillips, C. (2001). The Economics of ‘More Research is Needed’;. International Journal of Epidemiology. 30 (4), p. 771.
Project Management Institute (2004). ANSI Standard #ANSI/PMI 99-001-2004; 2004. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK Guide, (3rd ed.) Newton Square, Pennsylvania; Project Management Institute.
Salamin, N., Hodkinson, T. and Savolainen, V. (2005). Towards Building the Tree of Life: A Simulation Study for All Angiosperm Genera. Systematic Biology. 54 (2), p. 183.
Santos, T. and Guedes Soares, C. (2005). Monte Carlo Simulation of Damaged Ship Survivability. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 219 (1), p. 25.
Skitmore, M. and Ng, S. (2002). Analytical and Approximate Variance of Total Project Cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 128 (5), p. 456.
Smith, D. (1994). Incorporating Risk into Capital Budgeting Decisions Using Simulation. Management Decision. 32 (9), p. 20.
Williams, T. (2003). The Contribution of Mathematical Modeling to the Practice of Project Management. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics. 14 (1), p. 3.