Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-engineering

Baker, A. (2013). Simplicity. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/simplicity/

Bar-Hillel, Y., & Carnap, R. (1953). Semantic information. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 147–157.

Beaney, M. (2004). Carnap’s conception of explication. In S. Awodey & C. Klein (Eds.), Carnap brought home. The view from Jena (pp. 117–150). Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

Belnap, N. (1993). On rigorous definitions. Philosophical Studies, 72, 115–146.

Brun, G. (2004). Die richtige Formel. Philosophische Probleme der logischen Formalisierung (2nd ed.). Frankfurt a. M: Ontos.

Brun, G. (2014). Reconstructing arguments. Formalization and reflective equilibrium. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 17, 94–129.

Brun, G., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2014). Textanalyse in den Wissenschaften. Inhalte und Argumente analysieren und verstehen (2nd ed.). Zürich: vdf.

Carnap, R. (1945). The two concepts of probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 513–532.

Carnap, R. (1947). Probability as a guide in life. Journal of Philosophy, 44, 141–148.

Carnap, R. (1953). Inductive logic and science. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 80, 189–197.

Carnap, R. (1956) [1947]. Meaning and necessity. A study in semantics and modal logic (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carnap, R. (1962) [1950]. Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press/Routledge and Kegan Paul. Referenced as LFP.

Carnap, R. (1963). Replies and systematic expositions. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 859–1013). La Salle: Open Court. Referenced as RSE.

Carnap, R. (1966) [1926]. Physikalische Begriffsbildung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Carnap, R. (1990) [written 1952]. Quine on analyticity. In Creath, R. (Ed.). Dear Carnap. Dear Van. The Quine–Carnap correspondence and related work (pp. 427–432). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Carnap, R. (2003) [1928/34]. The logical structure of the world. Pseudoproblems in philosophy. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

Carus, A. W. (1999). Carnap, syntax, and truth. In J. Peregrin (Ed.), Truth and its nature (if any) (pp. 15–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Carus, A. W. (2007a). Carnap and twentieth-century thought. Explication as enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carus, A. W. (2007b). Carnap’s intellectual development. In M. Friedman & R. Creath (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Carnap (pp. 19–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2008). Complexity and vagueness in the capability approach: Strengths or weaknesses? In F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, & S. Alkire (Eds.), The capability approach. Concepts, measures and applications (pp. 268–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Copi, I. M. (1953). Introduction to logic. New York: MacMillan.

Creath, R. (Ed.). (1990). Dear Carnap. Dear Van. The Quine-Carnap correspondence and related work. Berkeley: University of California Press.

de Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific understanding. Synthese, 144, 137–170.

Douglas, H. (2013). The value of cognitive values. Philosophy of Science, 80, 796–806.

Eklund, M. (2014). Replacing truth? In A. Burgess & B. Sherman (Eds.), Metasemantics (pp. 293–310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eklund, M. (2015). Intuitions, conceptual engineering, and conceptual fixed points. In C. Daly (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of philosophical methods (pp. 363–385). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). London/New York: Verso.

Goodman, N. (1963). The significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 545–558). La Salle: Open Court.

Goodman, N. (1972) [1958]. The test of simplicity. In Problems and projects (pp. 279–294). Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

Goodman, N. (1977) [1951]. The structure of appearance (3rd ed.). Dordrecht: Reidel.

Goodman, N. (1983) [1954]. Fact, fiction, and forecast (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Greimann, D. (2007). Regeln für das korrekte Explizieren von Begriffen. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 61, 261–282.

Gustafsson, M. (2014). Quine’s conception of explication—And why it isn’t Carnap’s. In G. Harman & E. Lepore (Eds.), A companion to W.V.O. Quine (pp. 508–525). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

Hahn, S. (2013). Rationalität. Eine Kartierung. Münster: Mentis.

Hanna, J. F. (1968). An explication of ‘explication’. Philosophy of Science, 35, 28–44.

Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs, 34, 31–55.

Hegselmann, R. (1985). Die Korrespondenz zwischen Otto Neurath und Rudolf Carnap aus den Jahren 1934 bis 1945. Ein vorläufiger Bericht. In H.-J. Dahms (Ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaft, Aufklärung (pp. 276–290). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Hempel, C. G. (1952). Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hempel, C. G. (1970). Aspects of scientific explanation. In Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 331–496). New York: Free Press.

Hempel, C. G. (2000) [1988]. On the cognitive status and the rationale of scientific methodology. In Selected philosophical essays (pp. 199–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hilbert, D. (1894/1895). Die Theorie der algebraischen Zahlkörper. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 4, 175–546.

Justus, J. (2012). Carnap on concept determination. Methodology for philosophy of science. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2, 161–179.

Kant, I. (1998) [1781/1787]. Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kitcher, P. (2008). Carnap and the Caterpillar. Philosophical Topics, 36, 111–127.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The essential tension (pp. 320–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laporte, J. (2004). Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leitgeb, H. (2013). Scientific philosophy, mathematical philosophy, and all that. Metaphilosophy, 44, 267–275.

Lutz, S. (2012). On a straw man in the philosophy of science. A defense of the received view. HOPOS, 2, 77–119.

Maher, P. (2006). The concept of inductive probability. Erkenntnis, 65, 185–206.

Maher, P. (2007). Explication defended. Studia Logica, 86, 331–341.

Maher, P. (2010). What is probability? MS. http://patrick.maher1.net/preprints/pop.pdf . Accessed November 10, 2015.

Martin, M. (1973). The explication of a theory. Philosophia, 3, 179–199.

Pfister, J. (2013). Werkzeuge des Philosophierens. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Putnam, H. (1997). A half century of philosophy, viewed from within. Daedalus, 126, 175–208.

Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1980) [1951]. Two Dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view (2nd ed., pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Reck, E. (2012). Carnapian explication. A case study and critique. In P. Wagner (Ed.), Carnap’s ideal of explication and naturalism (pp. 96–116). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reichenbach, H. (1951). The verifiability theory of meaning. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 80, 46–60.

Richardson, A. (2013). Taking the measure of Carnap’s philosophical engineering. Metalogic as metrology. In E. Reck (Ed.), The historical turn in analytic philosophy (pp. 60–77). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Scanlon, T. M. (2008). Moral dimensions. Permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumann, W. (2008). Minerals of the world (2nd ed.). New York: Sterling.

Scorzato, L. (2013). On the role of simplicity in science. Synthese, 190, 2867–2895.

Shepherd, J., & Justus, J. (2015). X-Phi and Carnapian explication. Erkenntnis, 80, 381–402.

Siegwart, G. (1997a). Explikation. Ein methodologischer Versuch. In W. Löffler & E. Runggaldier (Eds.), Dialog und System (pp. 15–45). St. Augustin: Academia.

Siegwart, G. (1997b). Vorfragen zur Wahrheit. Ein Traktat über kognitive Sprachen. München: Oldenbourg.

Singh, G. (2010). Plant systematics (3rd ed.). Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Fogelin, R. J. (2010). Understanding arguments (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Sjögren, J. (2011). Concept formation in mathematics. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

Sober, E. (2000). Quine’s two Dogmas. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 74, 237–280.

Sorensen, R. (1991). Vagueness and desiderata for definition. In J. H. Fetzer, D. Shatz, & G. N. Schlesinger (Eds.), Definitions and definability (pp. 71–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Sorensen, R. (2013). Vagueness. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/vagueness/

Stalnaker, R. (1976). Propositions. In A. F. MacKay & D. D. Merrill (Eds.), Issues in the philosophy of language. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Stegmüller, W. (1973). Jenseits von Popper und Carnap. Die logischen Grundlagen des statistischen Schließens. Berlin: Springer. (= Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie; Bd. 4: Personelle und statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit. Studienausgabe, Teil D).

Strawson, P. F. (1963). Carnap’s views on constructed systems versus natural languages in analytic philosophy. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 503–518). La Salle: Open Court.

Wagner, P. (Ed.). (2012). Carnap’s ideal of explication and naturalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.