Explanation and Falsification in Phylogenetic Inference: Exercises in Popperian Philosophy
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cartmill M (1981) Hypothesis testing and phylogenetic reconstruction. Z f zool Systematik u Evolutionsforschung 19:73–96
Cleland CE (2002) Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philos Sci 69:474–496. doi: 10.1086/342455
de Queiroz K (2004) The measurement of test severity, significance tests for resolution, and a unified philosophy of phylogenetic inference. Zool Scr 33:463–473
Edwards AWF (1972) Likelihood. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore [1992 reprint]
Faith DP, Trueman JH (2001) Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol 50:331–350. doi: 10.1080/106351501300317969
Farris JS (1967) The meaning of relationship and taxonomic procedure. Syst Zool 16:44–51. doi: 10.2307/2411515
Farris JS (1983) The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick NI, Funk VA (eds) Advances in cladistics II. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 7–36
Fitzhugh K (2006b) The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zool Scr 35:261–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2006.00229.x
Fitzhugh K (2006c) The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics. Biol Philos 21:309–351. doi: 10.1007/s10539-005-7325-2
Gaffney ES (1979) An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Cracraft J, Eldredge N (eds) Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 79–111
Ghiselin MT (1966a) An application of the theory of definition to systematic principles. Syst Zool 15:127–130. doi: 10.2307/2411630
Ghiselin MT (1966b) On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Syst Zool 15:207–215. doi: 10.2307/2411392
Grant T (2002) Testing methods: the evaluation of discovery operations in evolutionary biology. Cladistics 18:94–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00142.x
Grant T, Kluge AG (2003) Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics 19:379–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00311.x
Grant T, Kluge AG (2004) Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20:23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00003.x
Grant T, Kluge AG (2007) Ratio of explanatory power (REP): a new measure of group support. Mol Phylo Evol 44:483–487. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.027
Grant T, Kluge AG (2008a) Credit where credit is due: the Goodman–Bremer support metric. Mol Phylo Evol 49:405–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.023
Grant T, Kluge AG (2008b) Clade support measures and their adequacy. Cladistics 24:1051–1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00231.x
Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Howson C, Urbach P (1993) Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach, 2nd edn. Open Court, Chicago
Hull DL (1967) Certainty and circularity in evolutionary taxonomy. Evol 21:174–189. doi: 10.2307/2406751
Hull DL (1974) Biology and philosophy of science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hull DL (1999) The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biol Philos 14:481–504. doi: 10.1023/A:1006554919188
Kearney M (2007) Philosophy and phylogenetics: historical and current connections. In: Hull DL, Ruse M (eds) The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 211–232
Kearney M, Rieppel O (2006) Rejecting “the given” in systematics. Cladistics 22:369–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00110.x
Kluge AG (1997) Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13:81–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00242.x
Kluge AG (2001a) Parsimony with and without scientific justification. Cladistics 17:199–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00117.x
Kluge AG (2001b) Philosophical conjectures and their refutation. Syst Biol 50:322–330. doi: 10.1080/10635150119615
Kluge AG (2003b) The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics 19:356–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00379.x
Kluge AG (2005) What is the rationale for ‘Ockham’s razor’ (a.k.a. parsimony) in phylogenetic inference? In: Albert VA (ed) Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–42
Kluge AG (2007) Completing the neo-Darwinian synthesis with an event criterion. Cladistics 23:613–633
Kluge AG, Grant T (2006) From conviction to anti-superfluity: old and new justifications of parsimony in phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 22:276–288
Lewontin RC (1980) Theoretical population genetics in the evolutionary synthesis. In: Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–68
Notturno MA (2000) Science and the open society: the future of Karl Popper’s philosophy. CEU Press, Budapest
Popper KR (1957) The poverty of historicism. Routledge, New York [1994 reprint]
Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Harper Torchbook, Harper and Row, New York [1968 reprint]
Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge. Clarendon Press, Oxford [1979 revised edition]
Popper KR (1974) 9. Kneale on my alleged exclusion of nonuniversal hypotheses. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of Karl Popper. Part three: the philosopher replies. Karl Popper: "Replies to my critics". Library Living Philosophers, vol XIV book II. Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, pp 987–989
Popper KR (1983) Realism and the aim of science. Routledge, New York [1992 reprint]
Richards R (2002) Kuhnian values and cladistic parsimony. Perspect Sci 10:1–27. doi: 10.1162/106361402762674780
Richards R (2003) Character individuation in phylogenetic inference. Philos Sci 70:264–279. doi: 10.1086/375467
Rieppel O (1996) Testing homology by congruence: the pectoral girdle of turtles. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1395–1398. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0204
Rieppel O (2004) What happens when the language of science threatens to break down in systematics: a Popperian perspective. In: Williams DM, Forey PL (eds) Milestones in systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 57–100
Rieppel O (2005) Proper names in twin worlds: monophyly, paraphyly, and the world around us. Org Divers Evol 5:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ode.2004.03.003
Rieppel O (2006) The merits of similarity reconsidered. Syst Biodivers 4:137–147. doi: 10.1017/S1477200005001830
Rieppel O (2007a) The nature of parsimony and instrumentalism in systematics. J Zoological Syst Evol Res 45:177–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2007.00426.x
Rieppel O (2007b) The metaphysics of Hennig’s phylogenetic systematics: substance, events and laws of nature. Syst Biodivers 5:345–360. doi: 10.1017/S1477200007002575
Rieppel O (2007c) Species: kinds of individuals or individuals of a kind. Cladistics 23:373–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00152.x
Rieppel O, Kearney M (2002) Similarity. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 75:59–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00006.x
Rieppel O, Rieppel M, Rieppel L (2006) Logic in systematics. J Zoological Syst Evol Res 44:186–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2006.00370.x
Siddall ME, Kluge AG (1997) Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13:313–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00322.x
Sober E (1988) Reconstructing the past: parsimony, evolution and inference. MIT Press, Cambridge
Sober E (1994) Let’s razor Ockham’s razor. In: Knowles D (ed) Explanation and its limits. Roy Instit Philos suppl 27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–93
Williams DM, Ebach MC (2006) The data matrix. Geodivers 28:409–420