Explaining Normative Versus Nonnormative Action: The Role of Implicit Theories

Political Psychology - Tập 37 Số 6 - Trang 835-852 - 2016
Eric Shuman1, Smadar Cohen‐Chen2, Sivan Hirsch‐Hoefler1, Eran Halperin1
1Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya
2Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

Tóm tắt

The current research investigates what motivates people to engage in normative versus nonnormative action. Prior research has shown that different emotions lead to different types of action. We argue that these differing emotions are determined by a more basic characteristic, namely, implicit theories about whether groups and the world in general can change. We hypothesized that incremental theories (beliefs that groups/the world can change) would predict normative action, and entity theories (beliefs that groups/the world cannot change) as well as group identification would predict nonnormative action. We conducted a pilot in the context of protests against a government plan to relocate Bedouin villages in Israel and a main study during the Israeli social protests of the middle class. Results revealed three distinct pathways to collective action. First, incremental theories about the world predicted hope, which predicted normative action. Second, incremental theories about groups and group identification predicted anger, which also predicted normative collective action. Lastly, entity theories about groups predicted nonnormative collective action through hatred, but only for participants who were highly identified with the group. In sum, people who believed in the possibility of change supported normative action, whereas those who believed change was not possible supported nonnormative action.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/978-1-4612-5743-1

10.2307/2393203

10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02040.x

10.1177/0146167211407076

10.1037/a0013965

Christensen P. N., 2004, Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social, Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295

10.1177/0146167215573210

10.1177/1948550613484499

10.5964/jspp.v2i1.230

10.1177/1948550613491292

Cohen‐Chen S., Understanding the social psychology of intractable conflicts: The Israeli‐Palestinian case and beyond: A tribute to the legacy of Daniel Bar‐Tal

Dweck C. S., 1999, Self‐theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development

10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1

10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103

10.1080/02699939308409193

10.1111/pops.12225

10.1177/0022002708314665

10.1080/10781919.2010.487862

10.1037/a0028620

10.1177/0956797612452572

10.1177/0022002710383670

10.1126/science.1202925

Hayes A. F., 2013, An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach

10.1080/095465590944569

10.1002/casp.2450050104

Klandermans B., 1997, The Social Psychology of Protest

Lazarus R. S., 1991, Emotion and adaption, 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001

10.1080/09546550902765508

10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.011

10.1080/02699939308409190

10.1080/02699930244000390

Roseman I. J., 1984, Review of personality and social psychology, 11

Roseman I. J., 2001, Appraisal Processes in Emotion, 68, 10.1093/oso/9780195130072.003.0004

10.1177/0146167206296956

10.1111/j.1475-6765.1991.tb00257.x

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x

Scherer K. R., 2001, Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, 10.1093/oso/9780195130072.001.0001

10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.592

10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319

10.1007/BF00319312

10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01626.x

10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.299

Stotland E., 1969, The psychology of hope

Tajfel H., 1979, The social psychology of intergroup relations, 7

10.1037/a0022728

Wright S. C., 2012, Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict inequality and social change, 225, 10.1017/CBO9781139022736.014

10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994

10.1111/spc3.12031

10.1177/1088868311430835

10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

10.1177/1368430210395637

10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649