Experimenting with Law: Brecht on Copyright

Alexander, Isabella, and Tomás Gómez-Arostegui. 2016. Research handbook on the history of copyright Law. London: Edward Elgar.

Benjamin, Walter. 1935. The work of art in the age of mechanical technological reproducibility. 1st version, Grey Room, No. 39, (Spring 2010), pp. 11–38.

Benjamin, Walter. 1936 [1970]. The author as producer. New Left Review 1(62): 83–96.

Benjamin, Walter. 1998. Understanding Brecht. London: Verso.

Brecht, Bertolt. 1964a. The film, the novel and epic theatre (from the Threepenny Lawsuit). In Brecht on theatre, ed. J. Willett. New York: Hill and Wang.

Brecht, Bertolt. 1964b. Sur le système cinématographique. Cahiers du Cinéma 114: 14–20.

Brecht, Bertolt. 1970. Sur le cinema. Paris: Editions l’Arche.

Brecht, Bertolt. 1977. Against Georg Lukács. In Aesthetics and politics, ed. F. Jameson, 68–85. London: Verso.

Brecht, Bertolt. 2000a. The Threepenny material (1930–1932). In Bertolt Brecht on film and radio. London: Methuen.

Brecht, Bertolt. 2000b. The Kuhle Wampe film (1932). In Bertolt Brecht on film and radio. London: Methuen.

Brewster, Ben. 1975. Brecht and the film industry (on The Threepenny Opera film and Hangmen Also Die). Screen 16(4): 16–33.

Bowrey, Kathy. 1996. Who’s writing copyright history? European Intellectual Property Review 18(6): 322–329.

Buccafusco, Christopher, and Paul Heald. 2013. Do bad things happen when works enter the public domain: Empirical tests of copyright term extension. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 28(1): 1–43.

‘Collective Presentation (1932)’. 1974. Screen 15(2): 43–44.

Deazley, Ronan, Martin Kretschmer, and Lionel Bently. 2010. Privilege and property. Essays on the history of copyright. Cambridge: OpenBook.

Dommann, Monika. 2015. Mehr Brecht als Recht – Der Dreigroschenprozess als Gerichtsbühne. e.t.ü. HistorikerInnen-Zeitschrift: 28–31.

Edelman, Bernard. 1973. Le Droit saisi par la photographie. Paris: F. Maspero. [1979. Ownership of the Image. Elements for a Marxist theory of law, trans. Elizabeth Kingdom. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul].

Eisner, Lotte. 1973. The haunted screen. Expressionism in the German cinema and the influence of Max Reinhardt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Elsaesser, Thomas. 1990. Transparent duplicities: Pabst’s Threepenny Opera. In The films of G.W. Pabst, ed. Eric Rentschler. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Farneth, David, Elmar Juchem, and Dave Stein. 1999. Kurt Weill: A life in pictures and documents. New York: The Overlook Press.

Frisch, Max. 1948. Diary. In Brecht. As they knew him, ed. Hubert Witt. Berlin: Seven Seas Books.

Gaines, Jane. 1991. Contested culture: The image, the voice and the law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

Gersch, Wolfgang. 1975. Film bei Brecht. Berlin: Henschelverlag.

Giles, Steve. 1997. Bertolt Brecht and critical theory: Marxism, modernity and the Threepenny Lawsuit. Berne: Peter Lang.

Giles, Steve. 1998. Marxist aesthetics and cultural modernity in Der Dreigroschenprozeß. In Bertolt Brecht: Centenary essays, ed. Steve Giles and Rodney Livingstone, 49–61. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Glahn, Philip. 2014. Bertolt Brecht. London: Reaktion Books.

Gröschner, Annett, and Christian Hippe. 2018. Laxheit in Fragen Geistigen Eigentums. Brecht und Urheberrecht. Berlin: Verbrecher Verlag.

Jameson, Fredric. 1998. Brecht and method. London: Verso.

Jelavich, Peter. 2006. Berlin Alexanderplatz: Radio, film, and the death of Weimar culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Jürgens, Martin. 1982. Zum Prinzip der Montage in Bertolt Brechts ‘soziologischen Experimenten’. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 46(12): 88–103.

Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Heidt, Todd. 2014. Double take: Béla Balázs and the visual disorientation of G.W. Pabst’s Dreigroschenoper. Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies 50(2): 178–196.

Hinton, Stephen. 1990. Kurt Weill: The threepenny opera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, Benjamin. 1967. An unhurried view of copyright. New York: Columbia University Press.

Katz, Pamela. 2015. The partnership: Brecht, Weill, three women, and Germany on the brink. New York: Anchor Books.

Kracauer, Siegfried. 1932. Ein soziologisches Experiment? Zu Bert Brechts Versuch Der Dreigroschenprozeß. Frankfurter Zeitung. 28 February 1932.

Kracauer, Siegfried. 1947. From Caligari to Hitler. A psychological history of German cinema. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kretschmer, Martin, Ronan Deazley, and Lionel Bently. 2013. The history of copyright history (revisited). World Intellectual Property Organization Journal 5(1): 35–44.

Kuhn, Tom, and Steve Giles. 2003. Brecht on art and politics. London: Methuen.

Lellis, George. 1982. Bertolt Brecht, Cahiers du Cinéma and contemporary film theory. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

Lukács, György. 1923. History and class consciousness [History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Markus, Gyorgy. 2001. Walter Benjamin or: The commodity as phantasmagoria. New German Critique 83: 3–42.

Morley, Michael. 1977. Brecht: A study. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Morley, Michael. 1998. Book review: Steve Giles’ ‘Bertolt Brecht and critical theory: Marxism, modernity and the Threepenny Lawsuit. Kurt Weill Newsletter 16(1): 14.

Mueller, Roswitha. 1986. Brecht and communications. Communications from the International Brecht Society 16(1): 18–23.

Mueller, Roswitha. 1987. Montage in Brecht. Theatre Journal 39(4): 473–486.

Mueller, Roswitha. 1989. Brecht and the theory of media. London: University of Nebraska Press.

Mussawir, Edward. 2005. The cinematics of jurisprudence. Law and Literature 17(1): 131–152.

Parker, Stephen. 2014. Bertolt Brecht: A literary life. London: Bloomsbury.

Patterson, Lyman Ray. 1968. Copyright in historical perspective. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

Petrie, Graham. 2004. Berthold Brecht and Béla Balázs: Paradoxes of exile. Canadian Journal of Film Studies 13(1): 2–27.

Pettifer, James. 1974. Against the stream—Kuhle Wampe. Screen 15(2): 49–64.

Philpotts, Matthew. 2004. Brecht and the institution(s) of literature. In The modern restoration: Re-thinking German literary history, ed. Stephen R. Parker, Peter J. Davies, and Matthew Philpotts, 1930–1960. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Rayns, Tony. 2007. The Threepenny Opera: Doubles and duplicities. The Criterion Collection. 18 September 2007. https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/614-the-threepenny-opera-doubles-and-duplicities.

Rokem, Freddie. 2014. Materializations of the supernatural. Paragrana 23(1): 71–87.

Rose, Mark. 1988. The author as proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship. Representations 23: 51–85.

Schwartz, Frederic J. 2018. Brecht’s ‘Threepenny Lawsuit’ and the culture of the case. Oxford Art Journal 41(2): 219–247.

Silberman, Marc (ed.). 2000. Bertolt Brecht on film and radio. London: Methuen.

Sherman, Brad. 1995. Appropriating the postmodern. Copyright and the challenge of the new. Social & Legal Studies 4: 31–54.

Sherman, Brad. 2011. What is a copyright work? Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12(1): 99.

Sherman, Brad, and Leanne Wiseman. 2012. Introduction. In Copyright and the challenge of the new, ed. Brad Sherman and Leanne Wiseman. London: Kluwer Law International.

Symonette, Lys, and Kim H. Kowalke. 1997. Speak low (when you speak love): The letters of Kurt Weill and Lotte Lenya. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Tretyakov, Sergei. 1934. Bert Brecht. In Brecht. As they knew him, ed. Hubert Witt. Berlin: Seven Seas Books.

Towse, Ruth, and Richard Watt. 2008. Recent trends in the economics of copyright. London: Edward Elgar.

von Götz von Olenhusen, Albrecht. 2017. Das Droit Moral des Urhebers und der Film der Zwanziger Jahre. Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum 9: 210–232.

Willett, John. 1977. The theatre of Bertolt Brecht. London: Methuen.

Willett, John. 1984. Brecht in context: Comparative approaches. London: Methuen.

Wizisla, Erdmut. 2014. Walter Benjamin and Bertolt Brecht: The story of a friendship. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Woodmansee, Martha. 1984. The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the ‘author’. Eighteenth-Century Studies 17: 425–448.