Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Capros, 2001
Kaur, 2018, Synthesis of fly ash based geopolymer mortar considering different concentrations and combinations of alkaline activator solution, Ceram. Int., 44, 1534, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.071
Panda, 2017, Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment, J. Clean. Prod., 167, 281, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.165
Garg, 2017, A new computational approach for estimation of wilting point for green infrastructure, Measurement, 111, 351, 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.026
Garg, 2017, Robust model design for evaluation of power characteristics of the cleaner energy system, Renew. Energy, 112, 302, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.041
Davidovits, 2008
Krivenko, 2010, 69, 1
Demie, 2013, Effects of micro-structure characteristics of interfacial transition zone on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 41, 91, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.067
Soar, 2006, Additive manufacturing technologies for the construction industry, Rapid Manuf.: Ind. Revolut. Digit. Age, 249, 10.1002/0470033991.ch17
Labonnote, 2016, Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities, Autom. Constr., 72, 347, 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026
Gosselin, 2016, Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete–a new processing route for architects and builders, Mater. Des., 100, 102, 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097
Wu, 2016, A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry, Autom. Constr., 68, 21, 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005
Tay, 2017, 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 12, 261, 10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724
Kothman, 2016, How 3D printing technology changes the rules of the game: insights from the construction sector, J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 27, 932, 10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0010
Bos, 2016, Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing, Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 11, 209, 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867
Kazemian, 2017, Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture, Constr. Build. Mater., 145, 639, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015
Paul, 2018, Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction, Arch. Civil. Mech. Eng., 18, 311, 10.1016/j.acme.2017.02.008
Rushing, 2017, Investigation of concrete mixtures for additive construction, Rapid Prototyp. J., 23, 74, 10.1108/RPJ-09-2015-0124
Panda, 2017, Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material, Mater. Lett., 209, 146, 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123
Le, 2012, Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete, Mater. Struct., 45, 1221, 10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z
Chhabra, 2011
Lipscomb, 1984, Flow of bingham fluids in complex geometries, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 14, 337, 10.1016/0377-0257(84)80052-X
H.V. Vikan, S. Jacobsen, Influence of rheology on the pumpability of mortar: P 2 Improved construction technology SP 2.4 Workability, 2010.
Le, 2015, Effect of lubrication layer on velocity profile of concrete in a pumping pipe, Mater. Struct., 48, 3991, 10.1617/s11527-014-0458-5
E.P. Koehler, D.W. Fowler, Summary of concrete workability test methods, 2003.
Ng, 2013, Development of a mix design methodology for high‐performance geopolymer mortars, Struct. Concr., 14, 148, 10.1002/suco.201200018
Choi, 2014, Prediction of concrete pumping using various rheological models, Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., 8, 269, 10.1007/s40069-014-0084-1
Jacobsen, 2010, 163
Panda, 2018, Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar, Measurement, 113, 108, 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.051
Li, 2016, Rheological study on 3D printability of alginate hydrogel and effect of graphene oxide, Int. J. Bioprinting, 2, 163, 10.18063/IJB.2016.02.007
Wallevik, 2009, Rheological properties of cement paste: thixotropic behavior and structural breakdown, Cem. Concr. Res., 39, 14, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.10.001
Nath, 2014, Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition, Constr. Build. Mater., 66, 163, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080
Favier, 2014, Flow properties of MK-based geopolymer pastes. A comparative study with standard Portland cement pastes, Soft Matter, 10, 1134, 10.1039/c3sm51889b