Experimental study on bubble behavior and CFD simulation of large-scale slurry bubble column reactor

Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China - Tập 4 - Trang 515-522 - 2010
Haoyi Sun1, Tao Li2, Weiyong Ying2, Dingye Fang2
1State-Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
2State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Tóm tắt

Slurry bubble column reactors (SBCR) is a three-phase fluidized reactor with outstanding advantages compared with other reactors and is difficult to scale-up due to lack of information on hydrodynamics and mass transfer over a wide range of operating conditions of commercial interest. In this paper, an experiment was conducted to investigate the bubble behavior in SBCR with a height of 5600 mm and an interior diameter of 480 mm. Bubble rise velocity, bubble diameter, and gas holdup in different radial and axial positions are measured in SBCR using four-channel conductivity probe. Tap water, air, and glass beads (mean diameter 75–150 μm) are used as liquid, gas, and solid phases, respectively. It shows that hydrodynamic parameters have good regularity in SBCR. Moreover, a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) package, Fluent, was used to simulate the process in SBCR. The simulations were carried out using axi-symmetric 2-D grids. Data obtained from experiment and CFD simulation are compared, and results show that the tendency of simulation is almost uniform with the experiment, which can help to obtain further understanding about multiphase flow process and establish a model about the synthesis of alcohol ether fuel in SBCR.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Nambiar D K R, Kumar R, Das T R, Gandhi K S. A new model for the breakage frequency of drops in turbulent stirred dispersions. Chemical Engineering Science, 1992, 47(12): 2989–3002 Randolph A D. A population balance for countable entities. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1964, 42: 280–28l Cents A H G, Jansen D J W, Brilman D W F, Versteeg G F. Influence of small amounts of additives on gas hold-up, bubble size, and interfacial area. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(14): 4863–4870 Wang T F, Wang J F, Ren F, Jin Y. Application of doppler ultrasound velocimetry in multiphase flow. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 92(1–3): 111–122 Zhang K, Zhao Y, Zhang B. Hydrodynamic behavior in a tapered bubble column. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2004, 20(4): 478–482 (in Chinese) Fredrickson A G, Tsuchiya H M. Continuous propagation of microorganisms. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1963, 9(4): 459–468 Utomo M B, Sakai T, Uchida S. Use of neural network-ultrasonic technique for measuring gas and solid hold-ups in a slurry bubble column. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2002, 25(3): 293 Weinstein H, Shao M, Schnitzlein M. Radial variation in solid density in high velocity fluidization. In: Basu P, ed. Circulating Fluidized Bed Technology. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986, 201–206 Vandu C O, Koop K, Krishna R. Large bubble sizes and rise velocities in a bubble column slurry reactor. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2004, 27(11): 1195–1199 Heard WB, Richter G R. Computational fluid dynamics in chemical reaction engineering. United Engineering Foundation, San Diego, 1996, 106–110 Thompson T. Vision 2020 comes into focus: the multiphase fluid dynamics research consortium. C & EN News, 1999, 185–190 Pan Y, Dudukovic M P, Chang M. Numerical investigation of gas-driven flow in 2-D bubble columns. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2000, 46(3): 434–449