Experimental field exclosure of birds and bats in agricultural systems — Methodological insights, potential improvements, and cost-benefit trade-offs

Basic and Applied Ecology - Tập 35 - Trang 1-12 - 2019
Bea Maas1, Sacha Heath2, Ingo Grass3, Camila Cassano4, Alice Classen5, Deborah Faria4, Pierre Gras6,7, Kimberly Williams-Guillén8, Matthew Johnson9, Daniel S. Karp10, Valerie Linden11, Alejandra Martínez-Salinas12,13, Julia M. Schmack14,15, Sara Kross10,16
1University of Vienna, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Tropical Ecology and Animal Biodiversity, Vienna, Austria
2University of California, Davis, Graduate Group in Ecology, Davis, USA
3University of Goettingen, Agroecology, Goettingen, Germany
4Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Applied Ecology and Conservation Lab, Ilhéus, Brazil
5University of Wuerzburg, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Wuerzburg, Germany
6Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Department of Ecological Dynamics, Berlin Germany
7Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, Berlin, Germany
8University of Michigan, School of Environment and Sustainability, Ann Arbor, USA
9Humboldt State University, Department of Wildlife, Arcata, CA, USA
10University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, Davis, USA
11University of Venda, Department of Zoology, Thohoyandou, Limpopo, South Africa
12Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE), Turrialba, Costa Rica
13University of Idaho, Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, Moscow, USA
14University of Auckland, Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, Auckland, New Zealand
15Senckenberg Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung, Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
16Columbia University, Department of Ecology, Evolution & Environmental Biology, New York, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bengtsson, 2005, The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 261, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x Boreux, 2013, Interactive effects among ecosystem services and management practices on crop production: Pollination in coffee agroforestry systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, 8387, 10.1073/pnas.1210590110 Chaplin-Kramer, 2011, A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity, Ecology Letters, 14, 922, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01642.x Classen, 2014, Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281 Costello, 2016, Field work ethics in biological research, Biological Conservation, 203, 268, 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.008 Crisol-Martínez, 2016, Using next-generation sequencing to contrast the diet and explore pest-reduction services of sympatric bird species in macadamia orchards in Australia, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150159 Damon, 2000, A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Bulletin of Entomological Research, 90, 453, 10.1017/S0007485300000584 Gras, 2016, How ants, birds and bats affect crop yield along shade gradients in tropical cacao agroforestry, Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 953, 10.1111/1365-2664.12625 Green, 2016, SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493, 10.1111/2041-210X.12504 Huntington, 2011, Integrating traditional and scientific knowledge through collaborative natural science field research: Identifying elements for success, Arctic, 437 Jezeer, 2017, Shaded coffee and cocoa-double dividend for biodiversity and small-scale farmers, Ecological Economics, 140, 136, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.019 Karp, 2018, Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, E7863 Karp, 2013, Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield, Ecology Letters, 16, 1339, 10.1111/ele.12173 Kross, 2016, Field-scale habitat complexity enhances avian conservation and avian-mediated pest-control services in an intensive agricultural crop, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 225, 140, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.043 Maas, 2018 Maas, 2016, Bird and bat predation services in tropical forests and agroforestry landscapes, Biological Reviews, 91, 1081, 10.1111/brv.12211 Maas, 2015, Avian species identity drives predation success in tropical cacao agroforestry, Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 735, 10.1111/1365-2664.12409 Maas, 2013, Bats and birds increase crop yield in tropical agroforestry landscapes, Ecology Letters, 16, 1480, 10.1111/ele.12194 Martin, 2013, Natural enemy interactions constrain pest control in complex agricultural landscapes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 110, 5534, 10.1073/pnas.1215725110 Martínez-Salinas, 2016, Bird functional diversity supports pest control services in a Costa Rican coffee farm, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 235, 277, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.029 Mata, 2018, How much is enough? Effects of technical and biological replication on metabarcoding dietary analysis, Molecular Ecology, 00, 1 Pompanon, 2012, Who is eating what: Diet assessment using next generation sequencing, Molecular Ecology, 21, 1931, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05403.x Solomon, 1976, Predation of overwintering larvae of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) by birds, Journal of Applied Ecology, 341, 10.2307/2401784 Tscharntke, 2005, Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management, Ecology Letters, 8, 857, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x Van Bael, 2008, Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems, Ecology, 89, 928, 10.1890/06-1976.1 Wise, 2007, Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: A review and assessment of three opposing models, American Naturalist, 169, 443, 10.1086/512044