Experiencia inicial en el tratamiento microquirúrgico del varicocele: análisis comparativo con la varicocelectomía macroquirúrgica convencional

Revista Internacional de Andrología - Tập 19 - Trang 88-92 - 2021
Jaime J. Fernández-Concha Schwalb1, José Torremadé Barreda1, José Francisco Suárez Novo1, Natalia Picola Brau1, Francisco Vigués Julia1
1Departamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España

Tài liệu tham khảo

Clarke, 1966, Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages, JAMA, 198, 1121, 10.1001/jama.1966.03110230137039 Greenberg, 1978, Experience with 425 subfertile male patients, J Urol, 119, 507, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57531-X Nagler, 1997, Varicocele, 336 Gorelick, 1993, Loss of fertility in men with varicocele, Fertil Steril, 59, 613, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55809-9 Cayan, 2005, Adolescent varicocele repair: Long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital, J Urol, 174, 2003, 10.1097/01.ju.0000176488.44895.7b Schiff, 2005, Managing varicoceles in children: Results with microsurgical varicocelectomy, BJU Int, 95, 399, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05308.x Cayan, 2000, Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele, Urology, 55, 750, 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00603-2 Pintus, 2001, Varicocele in pediatric patients: Comparative assessment of different therapeutic approaches, Urology, 57, 154, 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00859-1 Al-Kandari, 2007, Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: Open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: A randomized clinical trial, Urology, 69, 417, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057 Watanabe, 2005, Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: A comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches, Int J Urol, 12, 892, 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01142.x Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: A meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;0:33-40. Marmar, 1985, The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring, Fertil Steril, 43, 583, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48501-8 Goldstein, 1992, Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: An artery and lymphatic sparing technique, J Urol, 148, 1808, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37035-0 Hopps, 2003, Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: A microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach, J Urol, 170, 2366, 10.1097/01.ju.0000097400.67715.f8 Turek, 1995, The varicocele controversies II. Diagnosis and treatment, AUA Update Series, 14, 112 Sze, 2008, Persistent and recurrent postsurgical varicoceles: Venographic anatomy and treatment with N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 19, 539, 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.11.009 Baazeem, 2011, Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: A new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair, Eur Urol., 60, 796, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018 Ding, 2012, Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, BJU Int., 110, 1536, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11093.x Abdel-Meguid, 2011, Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidencebased perspective from a randomized, controlled trial, Eur Urol, 59, 455, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008 Agarwal, 2007, Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: New meta-analytical approach, Urology, 70, 532, 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.011 Boman, 2008, Microsurgical varicocelectomy for isolated asthenospermia, J Urol, 180, 2129, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.046 Choi, 2009, Factors related to improvement or normalization of semen parameters after microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy, Korean J Urol, 50, 39, 10.4111/kju.2009.50.1.39 Al-Said, 2008, Varicocelectomy for male infertility: A comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches, J Urol., 180, 266, 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.050 Murray, 1986, Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion, J Urol., 135, 286, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45615-1 Ghanem, 2004, Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: Comparative study of complications and surgical outcome, Urology., 64, 1005, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.060 Yavetz, 1992, Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality, Int J Androl., 15, 338, 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1992.tb01133.x Jungwirth, 2001, Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men, Andrologia., 33, 71, 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00407.x Orhan, 2005, Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele, Arch Androl., 51, 213, 10.1080/01485010590919648 Kumar, 2003, Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: Evaluation of the results, Urol Int., 71, 368, 10.1159/000074087 Marmar, 1994, Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: A technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data, J Urol., 152, 1127, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32521-1