Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks
Tóm tắt
Animals can reorient making use of the geometric shape of an environment, i.e., using sense and metric properties of surfaces. Animals reared soon after birth either in circular or in rectangular enclosures (and thus affording different experiences with metric properties of the spatial layout) showed similar abilities when tested for spatial reorientation in a rectangular enclosure. Thus, early experience in environments with different geometric characteristics does not seem to affect animals’ ability to reorient using sense and metric information. However, some results seem to suggest that when geometric and non-geometric information are set in conflict, rearing experience could affect the relative dominance of featural (landmark) and geometric information. In three separate experiments, newborn chicks reared either in circular- or in rectangular-shaped home-cages were tested for spatial reorientation in a rectangular enclosure, with featural information provided either by panels at the corners or by a blue-coloured wall. At test, when faced with affine transformations in the arrangement of featural information that contrasted with the geometric information, chicks showed no evidence of any effect of early experience on their relative use of geometric and featural information for spatial reorientation. These findings suggest that, at least for this highly precocial species, the ability to deal with geometry seems to depend more on predisposed mechanisms than on learning and experience after hatching.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrew RJ (1991) Neural and behavioural plasticity: the use of the domestic chick as a model. Oxford University Press, UK
Batty E, Bloomfield L, Spetch M, Sturdy C (2009) Black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees’ (Poecile gambeli) use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task. Anim Cogn 12:633–641
Brown AA, Spetch ML, Hurd PL (2007) Growing in circles: rearing environment alter spatial navigation in fish. Psychol Sci 18:569–573
Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178
Cheng K (2008) Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci 12:55–361
Cheng K, Newcombe N (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1–23
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2008a) Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Anim Cogn 11:139–146
Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2008b) Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives. Cogn Proc 9:229–238
Chiandetti C, Regolin L, Sovrano VA, Vallortigara G (2007) Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information. Anim Cogn 10:159–168
Dehaene S, Izard V, Pica P, Spelke ES (2006) Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 311:381–384
Gagliardi-Seeley JL, Itzkowitz M (2006) Male size predicts the ability to defend offspring in the biparental convict cichlid Archocentrus nigrofasciatus. J Fish Biol 69:1239–1244
Gray ER, Bloomfield LL, Ferrey A, Spetch ML, Sturdy CB (2005) Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry. Biol Lett 1:314–317
Kelly DM, Spetch ML, Heth CD (1998) Pigeons (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. J Comp Psychol 112:259–269
Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2001) Toddlers’ use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. J Exp Child Psychol 80:225–244
Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Sheridan N, Jones M (2008) Why size counts: children’s spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. Dev Sci 11:414–426
Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 57:971–976
Rose S (2000) God’s organism? The chick as a model system for memory studies. Learn Mem 7:1–17
Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution and behaviour. University Press, New York, Oxford
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, San Francisco
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2002) Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition 85:51–59
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003) Modularity as a fish views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 29:199–210
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2005) Animals’ use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space. Cognition 97:121–133
Sovrano VA, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2007) How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces. Anim Cogn 10:47–54
Spelke ES (2000) Core knowledge. Am Psychol 55:1233–1243
Spelke ES (2003) What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In: Gentner D, Goldin-Meadow S (eds) Language in mind: advances in the investigation of language and thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Spelke ES, Kinzler KD (2007) Core knowledge. Dev Sci 10:89–96
Vallortigara G (2009) Animals as natural geometers. In: Tommasi L, Peterson M, Nadel L (eds) The biology of cognition. MA, MIT Press, pp 83–104
Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animal’s spatial representation: a test with chicks. J Comp Psychol 104:248–254
Vallortigara G, Feruglio M, Sovrano VA (2004) Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different spatial size. Dev Sci 8:393–401
Vallortigara G, Sovrano VA, Chiandetti C (2009) Doing socrates experiment right: controlled-rearing studies of geometrical knowledge in animals. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:20–26