Excision or Observation: The Dilemma of Managing High-Risk Breast Lesions

Gutwein, 2017, Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions, Am J Surg, 202, 127, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.005 Hartmann LC, Degnim AC, Santen RJ, et al. (2015). Special report Atypical Hyperplasia of the Breast—Risk Assessment and Management Options. Kiluk, 2007, High-risk benign breast lesions: current strategies in management, Cancer Control, 4, 321, 10.1177/107327480701400402 Danforth, 2018, Molecular profile of atypical hyperplasia of the breast, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 167, 9, 10.1007/s10549-017-4488-x Said, 2015, Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: A Mayo cohort study, Cancer, 121, 1548, 10.1002/cncr.29243 Uzoaru, 2012, Flat epithelial atypia with and without atypical ductal hyperplasia: To re-excise or not. Results of a 5-year prospective study, Virchows Arch, 461, 419, 10.1007/s00428-012-1312-1 Morrow, 2015, Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 12, 227, 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.8 Bombonati, 2011, The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression, J Pathol, 223, 307 Solorzano, 2011, Flat epithelial atypia of the breast: Pathological-radiological correlation, Am J Roentgenol, 197, 740, 10.2214/AJR.10.5265 Peres, 2012, Rates of upgrade to malignancy for 271 cases of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed by breast core biopsy, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 133, 659, 10.1007/s10549-011-1839-x Krishnamurthy, 2012, Multidisciplinary considerations in the management of high-risk breast lesions, Am J Roentgenol, 198, 132, 10.2214/AJR.11.7799 Ceugnart, 2013, Pure flat epithelial atypia: Is there a place for routine surgery?, Diagn Interv Imaging, 94, 861, 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.011 Eby, 2009, Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9- Versus II-gauge, Am J Roentgenol, 192, 229, 10.2214/AJR.08.1342 McGhan, 2012, Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: An automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?, Ann Surg Oncol, 19, 3264, 10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0 Shin, 2002, Excisional biopsy should be performed if lobular carcinoma in situ is seen on needle core biopsy, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 126, 697, 10.5858/2002-126-0697-EBSBPI Darling MLR, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. (2000). Revealed by Large-Core Needle Excision. 1341-1346. Jackman, 2002, Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision?, Radiology, 224, 548, 10.1148/radiol.2242011528 Kohr, 2010, Risk of upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia after stereotactic breast biopsy: Effects of number of foci and complete removal of calcifications 1, Radiology, 255, 723, 10.1148/radiol.09091406 Heller, 2012, Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI, Am J Roentgenol, 198, 249, 10.2214/AJR.11.7610 Chlebowski, 2016, Breast cancer chemoprevention: Targeting the estrogen receptor, Am J Hematol Oncol, 12, 6 Tarallo, 2012, Intraductal papilloma of the breast: A case report, J Ultrasound, 15, 99, 10.1016/j.jus.2012.03.002 Agoumi, 2016, Practical considerations in breast papillary lesions: A review of the literature, Arch Patholog Lab Med, 140, 770, 10.5858/arpa.2015-0525-RA Debnath, 2010, Multiple papillomatosis of breast and patient's choice of treatment, Patholog Res Int, 2010 Hong, 2016, Predictive factors for upgrading patients with benign breast papillary lesions using a core needle biopsy, J Breast Cancer, 19, 410, 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.410 Londero, 2012, High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: Usefulness of MRI for treatment decision, Am J Roentgenol, 199, 240, 10.2214/AJR.11.7869 Kil, 2017, Is surgical excision necessary in benign papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core biopsy?, Breast, 17, 258, 10.1016/j.breast.2007.10.008 Agoff, 2004, Papillary lesions of the breast with and without atypical ductal hyperplasia: Can we accurately predict benign behavior from core needle biopsy, Am J Clin Pathol, 122, 440, 10.1309/NAPJMB0GXKJC6PTH Page, 1996, Subsequent breast carcinoma risk after biopsy with atypia in a breast papilloma, Cancer, 78, 258, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<258::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-V Jaffer, 2009, Excision is indicated for intraductal papilloma of the breast diagnosed on core needle biopsy, Cancer, 115, 2837, 10.1002/cncr.24321 Linda, 2012, Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: Can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?, Am J Roentgenol, 198, 272, 10.2214/AJR.11.7040 Mahoney, 2006, Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: Correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up, Am J Roentgenol, 187, 949, 10.2214/AJR.05.0710 King, 2015, Lobular carcinoma in situ: A 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk, J Clin Oncol, 33, 3945, 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4743 Middleton LP, Sneige N, Coyne R, et al. (2014). Multidisciplinary setting. Berg, 2001, Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle breast biopsy, Radiology, 218, 503, 10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe32503 O'Malley, 2010, Lobular neoplasia: Morphology, biological potential and management in core biopsies, Mod Pathol, 23, S14, 10.1038/modpathol.2010.35 Smetheram, 2007, Effect of breast core needle biopsy technique on detection of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia, Ochsner J, 7, 121 Sen, 2016, Core breast biopsies showing lobular carcinoma in situ should be excised and surveillance is reasonable for atypical lobular hyperplasia, Am J Roentgenol, 207, 1132, 10.2214/AJR.15.15425 Nassar, 2015, Radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions: A clinicopathologic correlation study from a single institution, Ann Diagn Pathol, 19, 24, 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.12.003 Matrai, 2015, Advocating nonsurgical management of patients with small, incidental radial scars at the time of needle core biopsy: A study of 77 cases, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 139, 1137, 10.5858/arpa.2014-0550-OA Kim, 2016, Isolated radial scar diagnosis by core-needle biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?, Springerplus, 5, 398, 10.1186/s40064-016-1993-z Kennedy, 2003, Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: A review, J Clin Pathol, 56, 721, 10.1136/jcp.56.10.721 Sloane, 1993, Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in radial scars and complex sclerosing lesions: importance of lesion size and patient age, Histopathology, 23, 225, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1993.tb01194.x Cohen, 2017, Radial scars of the breast encountered at core biopsy: Review of histologic, imaging, and management considerations, Am J Roentgenol, 209, 1168, 10.2214/AJR.17.18156 Osborn, 2011, A review of needle core biopsy diagnosed radial scars in the Welsh breast screening programme, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 93, 123, 10.1308/003588411X12851639107953 Linda, 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging of radial sclerosing lesions (radial scars) of the breast, Eur J Radiol, 81, 3201, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.038 Meares, 2016, Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: A clinical outcome and histologic analysis of 102 cases, Hum. Pathol, 49, 33, 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.10.004 Ha, 2015, Mucocele-like lesions in the breast diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy: Is surgical excision necessary?, Am J Roentgenol, 204, 204, 10.2214/AJR.13.11988 Sutton, 2012, Mucocele-like lesions diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Assessment of upgrade rate and need for surgical excision, Am J Clin Pathol, 138, 783, 10.1309/AJCP1D8YLCFFTLOW