Examining the impact of visibility on market efficiency: lessons from movement in NFL betting lines

Kevin Krieger1, Justin Davis2
1Department of Accounting and Finance, University of West Florida, Pensacola, USA
2Department of Business Administration, University of West Florida, Pensacola, USA

Tóm tắt

In general, financial markets of limited attention or visibility are expected to exhibit more inefficient asset prices. Such markets thus require eventual, increased trading to resolve these inefficiencies. In this study, we consider this financial framework within the sports gambling market for National Football League (NFL) games. We consider whether NFL games garnering less public attention are more likely to see larger movements in their betting lines. We consider games with smaller television audiences, with kickoff times shared with other contests, and between teams with smaller fanbases, to be indicative of less visibility. To test our model, we collected betting line data for all regular and postseason NFL football games from 2007–2021. Based on a sample of 3,756 games, our findings indicate more frequent and larger line movements in games with indications of less widespread attention, and many of these results are statistically significant. Our conjecture is that such differences in line movement levels may derive from the limited resources of oddsmakers being disproportionately focused on games with the most visibility.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Avery C, Chevalier J (1999) Identifying investor sentiment from price paths: the case of football betting. J Bus 72(4):493–521 Barber BM, Griffin PA, Lev B (1993) The fraud-on-the-market theory and the indicators of common stocks’ efficiency. J Corp L 19:285–303 Busse JA, Green TC (2002) Market efficiency in real time. J Financ Econ 65(3):415–437 Corwin S, Coughenour JF (2008) Limited attention and the allocation of effort in securities trading. J Financ 63(6):3031–3067 Francisco J, Moore E (2019) Betting with house money: reverse line movement based strategies in college football totals markets. J Econ Financ 43(4):813–827 Gandar J, Zuber R, O’Brien T, Russo B (1988) Testing rationality in the point spread betting market. J Financ 43(4):995–1008 Gandar JM, Dare WH, Brown CR, Zuber RA (1998) Informed traders and price variations in the betting market for professional basketball games. J Financ 53(1):385–401 Golec J, Tomarkin M (1991) The degree of inefficiency in the football betting market: statistical tests. J Financ Econ 30:311–323 Gray P, Gray S (1997) Testing market efficiency: evidence from the NFL sports betting market. J Financ 52:1725–1737 Hasan R, Shahid A (2016) How does experts’ limited attention affect stock prices? Acad Manag Ann Meet Proceed 1:1 Kang B, Salaga S (2022) The impact of information release on line accuracy and line movement: evidence from the NCAA basketball betting market. Int J Sport Financ 17:29–40 Koning RH, Zijm R (2023) Betting market efficiency and prediction in binary choice models. Ann Oper Res 325:135–148 Krieger K, Fodor A (2013) Price movements and the prevalence of informed traders: the case of line movement in college basketball. J Econ Bus 68:70–82 Krieger K, Davis J, Strode S (2021) Patience is a virtue: exploiting behavior bias in gambling markets. J Econ Financ 45:735–750 Lasfer MA, Melnik A, Thomas DC (2003) Short-term reaction of stock markets in stressful circumstances. J Bank Financ 27(10):1959–1977 Levitt SD (2004) Why are gambling markets organised so differently from financial markets? Econ J 114(495):223–246 Li L, Li Y, Wang X, He Y (2021) Limited attention, managerial multitasking, and hedge fund performance in China. Pac Basin Financ J 67:1–20 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2005) Bettor preferences and market efficiency in football totals markets. J Econ Financ 29:409–415 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2007) Does sportsbook.com set point spreads to maximize profits? J Prediction Mark 1(3):209–218 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2010) The determinants of betting volume for sports in North America: evidence of sports betting as consumption in the NBA and NHL. Int J Sport Financ 5(2):128 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2021) Revisiting the balanced book hypothesis–bettor preferences and results in the NFL. J Prediction Mark 15(3):85–98 Paul RJ, Weinbach AP, Humphreys B (2014) Bettor belief in the “hot hand” evidence from detailed betting data on the NFL. J Sports Econ 15(6):636–649 Shank CA (2019) NFL betting biases, profitable strategies, and the wisdom of the crowd. Int J Sport Financ 14(1):3–12 Spitznagel E (2011) Betting below the rim. Bloomberg Businessweek 4224:75–77 Vergin R, Sosik J (1999) No place like home: an examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. J Econ Bus 51:21–31 Zhao T (2012) Firm size, information acquisition and price efficiency. Quant Finan 12(10):1599–1614