Examining the effects of green infrastructure on residential sales prices in Omaha, Nebraska

Anderson, 2006, Open space, residential property values, and spatial context, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 36, 773, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007 Baron, 2016, Estimating the capitalization effects of harmful algal bloom incidence, intensity and duration? Belcher, 2018, Tropical vegetation and residential property value: a hedonic pricing analysis in Singapore, Ecol. Econ., 149, 149, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.012 Bell, 2017, A model of hydrology and water quality for stormwater control measures, Environ. Model. Softw., 95, 29, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.05.007 Beltrán, 2019, The impact of flooding on property prices: a repeat-sales approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 95, 62, 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.006 Berland, 2015, How environmental justice patterns are shaped by place: terrain and tree canopy in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, Cities Environ. (CATE), 8, 1 Berland, 2017, The role of trees in urban stormwater management, Landsc. Urban Plan., 162, 167, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017 Brander, 2011, The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2763, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019 Case, 1989, The efficiency of the market for single family homes, Am. Econ. Rev., 79, 45 Case, 2006, The impact of environmental contamination on condo prices: a hybrid repeat‐sale/hedonic approach, Real Estate Econ., 34, 77, 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2006.00160.x Center for Neighborhood Technology, 2010 Cho, 2009, Amenity values of spatial configurations of forest landscapes over space and time in the Southern Appalachian Highlands, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2646, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.017 City of Omaha, 2010 City of Omaha, 2010 City of Omaha, 2014 Clean Solutions for Omaha. 2019. http://www.omahacso.com/projects/completedprojects/. Cohen, 2016, Hedonic valuation with translating amenities: mountain Pine Beetles and host trees in the Colorado Front Range, Environ. Resour. Econ., 63, 613, 10.1007/s10640-014-9856-y Czembrowski, 2016, Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services, Landsc. Urban Plan., 146, 11, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005 Escobedo, 2015, Urban forest structure effects on property value, Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 209, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.002 European Commission, 2019 Fletcher, 2015, SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525, 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314 Francke, 2010, Repeat sale index for thin markets: a structured time series approach, J. Real Estate Financ. Econ., 41, 24, 10.1007/s11146-009-9203-1 Frey, 2015 Gobster, 1998, Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks, Landsc. Urban Plan., 41, 43, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00045-0 Gobster, 2004, The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences, Landsc. Urban Plan., 68, 147, 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2 Goetzmann, 1995, Non-temporal components of residential real estate appreciation, Rev. Econ. Stat., 1, 199, 10.2307/2110007 Guignet, 2013, What do property values really tell us? A hedonic study of underground storage tanks, Land Econ., 89, 211, 10.3368/le.89.2.211 Hall, 2010 Hansen, 2006, Australian house prices: a comparison of hedonic and repeat‐sales measures, Econ. Rec., 85, 132, 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00544.x Heckert, 2016, Developing a green infrastructure equity index to promote equity planning, Urban For. Urban Green., 19, 263, 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.011 Hoover, 2019, Developing a framework for stormwater management: leveraging ancillary benefits from urban greenspace, Urban Ecosyst., 22, 1139, 10.1007/s11252-019-00890-6 Hoyle, 2017, All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting, Landsc. Urban Plan., 164, 109, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 Ichihara, 2011, New York City property values: what is the impact of green roofs on rental pricing?, Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci., 4, 21, 10.1007/s12076-010-0046-4 Isely, 2018, A socioeconomic analysis of habitat restoration in the Muskegon Lake area of concern, J. Great Lakes Res., 44, 330, 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.12.002 Jaffe, 2010, Environmental reviews & case studies: reflections on green infrastructure economics, Environ. Pract., 12, 357, 10.1017/S1466046610000475 Jarrad, 2018, Urban stream restoration projects: Do project phase, distance, and type affect nearby property sale prices?, Land Econ., 94, 368, 10.3368/le.94.3.368 Kaplan, 1985, The analysis of perception via preference: a strategy for studying how the environment is experienced, Landsc. Plann., 12, 161, 10.1016/0304-3924(85)90058-9 Kaplan, 1988, Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: a review and recent findings, Landsc. Urban Plan., 15, 107, 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90019-9 Kuo, 2001, Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime?, Environ. Behav., 33, 343 Landry, 2009, Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity, Environ. Plan. A, 41, 2651, 10.1068/a41236 Lapham, 2016, How important is perception of safety to park use? A four-city survey, Urban Stud., 53, 2624, 10.1177/0042098015592822 Li, 2015, Who lives in greener neighborhoods? The distribution of street greenery and its association with residents’ socioeconomic conditions in Hartford, Connecticut, USA, Urban For. Urban Green., 14, 751, 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.006 Liebelt, 2018, Revealing preferences for urban green spaces: a scale-sensitive hedonic pricing analysis for the city of Leipzig, Ecol. Econ., 146, 536, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.006 Livy, 2016, Maintaining public goods: the capitalized value of local park renovations, Land Econ., 92, 96, 10.3368/le.92.1.96 Mazzotta, 2014, A meta-analysis of hedonic studies to assess the property value effects of low impact development, Resources, 3, 31, 10.3390/resources3010031 Netusil, 2014, Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon, Landsc. Urban Plan., 124, 14, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.002 Noor, 2015, Sustainable urban regeneration: GIS and hedonic pricing method in determining the value of green space in housing srea, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 170, 669, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.069 Panduro, 2013, Classification and valuation of urban green spaces—a hedonic house price valuation, Landsc. Urban Plan., 120, 119, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.009 Rigolon, 2017, Parks and young people: an environmental justice study of park proximity, acreage, and quality in Denver, Colorado, Landsc. Urban Plan., 165, 73, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.007 Rigolon, 2020, Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?, Urban Stud., 57, 402, 10.1177/0042098019849380 Saphores, 2012, Estimating the value of urban green areas: a hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA, Landsc. Urban Plan., 104, 373, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.012 Schläpfer, 2015, Valuation of landscape amenities: a hedonic pricing analysis of housing rents in urban, suburban and periurban Switzerland, Landsc. Urban Plan., 141, 24, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.04.007 Schultz, 2008 Seymour, 2010, Resident perceptions of urban alleys and alley greening, Appl. Geogr., 30, 380, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.11.002 Shultz, 2017 Stratus Consulting Inc, 2009 US Census Bureau, 2010 US EPA, 2013 US EPA, 2020 Vandegrift, 2018, An economic analysis of complete streets policies, Landsc. Urban Plan., 171, 88, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.004 Votsis, 2017, Planning for green infrastructure: the spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki’s apartment prices, Ecol. Econ., 132, 279, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.029 Waltert, 2010, Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies, Ecol. Econ., 70, 141, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.031 Ward, 2008, The effect of low-impact-development on property values, Proc. Water Environ. Fed., 2008, 318, 10.2175/193864708788808348