Examining the dimensions of technology
Tóm tắt
The meaning of technology seems simple. Most people have little difficulty expressing some notion of what it is. Technology is machine, automobile, computer, tool ... the list goes on and on. For some, technology is defined in contrast to other academic disciplines such as science or engineering. It is clear that science and technology are woven throughout a larger complex of human activity which is oriented around a mix of economic, political, humanitarian, and cultural means and ends. However, it is also clear that the knowledge base, processes, and goals of technology are distinctly different from science. This paper depicts technology as consisting of four distinct conceptual dimensions. These are (a) artefact, (b) knowledge, (c) process, and (d) volition (Mitcham, 1979). The goals are to clarify and explore the conceptual complexities of technology in order to provide a conceptual foundation for the study of Technology Education for all. A central mission of education should be to orient people to the cultures within which they are living and making decisions. Given that technology and technological systems are important in every culture around the world, it is absolutely essential that they become a primary focus of study.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Basilla, G.: 1988,The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Bensen, M. J.: 1992, February (Teleconference presentation, Conceptual Framework for Technology Education). University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. & Pinch, T. J.: 1987,The Social Construction Of Technological Systems: New Directions In The Sociology And History Of Technology, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Custer, R. L.: 1990, ‘Liberal Education and the Practical Arts’,Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 27(4), 46–55.
Daft, R. L.: 1988,Organization Theory and Design, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota.
Ellul, J.: 1964,The Technological Society, Knopf Publishing Co., New York.
Frey, R. E.: 1991, ‘Another Look at Technology and Science’,Journal of Technology Education 3(1), 16–29.
Heidegger, M.: 1966, ‘Discourse on Thinking’, translated by John M. Anderson and E. Hans Freund. Harper and Row, New York, NY.
Jowett, B.: 1941, ‘Plato's The Republic’, translated by B. Jowett. The Modern Library, New York.
Kasprzyk, S. F.: 1980, ‘Technology: A Socio-Historical Perspective’, in H. A. Anderson & M. J. Bensen (eds.),Technology and Society: Interfaces with Industrial Arts, American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, McKnight Publishing Co., Bloomington, Illinois, 19–42.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Mitcham, C.: 1979, ‘Philosophy and the History of Technology’, in G. Bugliarello (ed.),The History and Philosophy of Technology, University of Illinois Press, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, 163–189.
Mitcham, C.: 1980, ‘Philosophy of Technology’, in P. T. Durbin (ed.),A guide to the Culture of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Free Press, New York, 282–363.
MacKenzie, D. A. & Wajcman, J.: 1985,The Social Shaping of Technology, Open University Press, England.
Morrison, E. E.: 1980,The New Liberal Arts: A Response, A document produced by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 209 197)
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A.: 1972,Human problem solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Pacey, A.: 1983,The Culture of Technology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Roy, R.: 1991, February, ‘The Sciences' Approach to Conceptualizing Technology’, in R. Custer (researcher),Conceptualizations of Technology Colloquium (Colloquium conducted at the meeting of the National Association for Science), Technology, and Society, Washington, DC.
Vincenti, W. G.: 1990,What Engineers Know and How They Know It, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
Winner, L.: 1977,Autonomous Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.