Exact optimal sample allocation: More efficient than Neyman

Statistics and Probability Letters - Tập 129 - Trang 50-57 - 2017
Tommy Wright1
1U.S. Bureau of the Census, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Carrizosa, 2007, A biobjective method for sample allocation in stratified sampling, European J. Oper. Res., 177, 1074, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.027 Cochran, 1977 Cormen, 2009, Greedy algorithms Degler, G.A., 2015. Incorporation of aggregate level constraints into the sample design and determination of final sample size for BSR-17, Business sample revision 2017, SG2-sampling operations, Economic Directorate, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. Fuller, 2009 Lohr, 2010 Neyman, 1934, On the two different aspects of the representative method: The method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 97, 558, 10.2307/2342192 Tschuprow, 1923, On the mathematical expectation of the moments of frequency distributions in the case of correlated observations, Metron, 2, 461 Wright, 2012, The equivalence of Neyman optimum allocation for sampling & equal proportions for apportioning the U.S. House of Representatives, Amer. Statist., 66, 217, 10.1080/00031305.2012.733679 Wright, 2014 Wright, 2016