Ex vivo porcine model for eye, eyelid, and orbit movement analysis of 4-mm ferromagnetic foreign bodies in MRI

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 260 - Trang 311-318 - 2021
M. Ghemame1, C. Cathelineau2, B. Carsin-Nicol2, P.-A. Eliat3, H. Saint-Jalmes4, J.-C. Ferré2,5, F. Mouriaux1,6
1Department of Ophthalmology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
2Department of neuroradiology, Rennes university hospital, Rennes, France
3CNRS, Inserm, BIOSIT- UMS 3480, US_S 018, Rennes, France
4University of Rennes, Rennes University Hospital, CLCC Eugène Marquis, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France
5University of Rennes, Rennes University Hospital, Inria, CNRS, INSERM, IRISA, Empenn ERL U-1228, Rennes, France
6University of Rennes, INSERM, UMR 1241, Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer (NuMeCan), Rennes, France

Tóm tắt

Ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFB) present during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) explorations can lead to tissue injury due to movement, especially in and around the eyes. Ferromagnetic foreign bodies located in the intraocular area, eyelids, and orbit are thus prohibited from undergoing MRI. The aim of the study was to analyze movement of 4-mm ferromagnetic foreign bodies in MRI in the eye, eyelid, and orbit using computed tomography (CT) scan. We developed a porcine model using 12 quarters of fresh porcine heads. Each porcine head included one whole orbit with the ocular globe, orbital fat, muscles, and eyelids. Four-millimeter FFB were implanted in the eye within 2 days post-slaughter, and images were acquired within 5 days post-slaughter. Four-millimeter FFB movement was analyzed after 1.5-Tesla (T) MRI. Four locations were tested: intravitreous, suprachoroidal, intraorbital fat, and intrapalpebral. Movement analysis was assessed using computed tomography (CT) scan. The intravitreous ferromagnetic ball moved 14.0 ± 8.8 mm (p < 0.01), the suprachoroidal ball moved 16.8 ± 5.4 mm (p < 0.01), the intraorbital fat ball moved 5.8 ± 0.9 mm (p > 0.05), and the intrapalpebral ball moved 2.0 ± 0.4 mm (p > 0.05). The ex vivo porcine model was able to study FFB movement. The 4-mm ferromagnetic balls moved in intravitreous and in suprachoroidal locations after MRI.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Detournay. B, Courouve. L (2017). Les insuffisances en matière d’équipement d’imagerie médicale en France. http://www.sfrnet.org/rc/org/sfrnet/htm/Article/2015/20150625-083932-499/src/htm_fullText/fr/2015-014%20ISA%20IRM%20Rapport%2013-05-15.pdf Schenck JF (2000) Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:2–19 Lagouros PA et al (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging and intraocular foreign bodies. Arch Ophthalmol 105:551–553 Williams S, Char DH, Dillon WP, Lincoff N, Moseley M (1988) Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 105:398–401 Williamson TH, Smith FW, Forrester JV (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging of intraocular foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol 73:555–558 Gunenc U, Ahmet M, Suleyman K, Tugrul P (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the detection and localization of intra ocular foreign bodies. Documentia Ophtalmologica 81:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169098 Cullen C, Kendall E, Cui J, Colleaux K, Grahn B (2002) The effects of exposure to a 1.5-tesla magnetic field on intravitreous metallic foreign bodies in rabbits. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:393–402 Duratool (2014) 450 piece steel Ball Assortment V1.0 2057 https://cpc.farnell.com/duratool/d01897/steel-ball-assortment-450pc/dp/FN02654#anchorTechnicalDOCS Yushkevich PA et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 31:1116–1128 Lawrence DA, Lipman AT, Gupta SK, Nacey NC (2015) Undetected intraocular metallic foreign body causing hyphema in a patient undergoing MRI: a rare occurrence demonstrating the limitations of pre-MRI safety screening. Magn Reson Imaging 33:358–361 Platt AS, Wajda BG, Ingram AD, Wei X-C, Ells AL (2017) Metallic intraocular foreign body as detected by magnetic resonance imaging without complications– a case report. Am J Ophthalmol Case Reports 7:76–79 Fernandez-Bueno I, Pastor JC, Gayoso M, Alcalde I (2008) Müller and macrophage-like cell interactions in an organotypic culture of porcine neuroretina. Mol Vis 14:2148–2156 Ruiz-Ederra J et al (2005) The pig eye as a novel model of glaucoma. Exp Eye Res 81:561–569 Nishi O, Nishi K, Nishi Y, Chang S (2008) Capsular bag refilling using a new accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:302–309 Olsen TW, Sanderson S, Feng X, Hubbard WC (2002) Porcine sclera: thickness and surface area. IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 43:4 Swindle KE, Hamilton PD, Ravi N (2008) In situ formation of hydrogels as vitreous substitutes: viscoelastic comparison to porcine vitreous. J Biomed Mater Res 87A:656–665 Gor DM, Kirsch CF, Leen J, Turbin R, Von Hagen S (2001) Radiologic differentiation of intraocular glass: evaluation of imaging techniques, glass types, size, and effect of intraocular hemorrhage. Am J Roentgenol 177:1199–1203 Shellock FG (2000) Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:30–36