Evolutionary arguments against moral realism: Why the empirical details matter (and which ones do)

Artiga M (2015) Rescuing tracking theories of morality. Philos Stud 172:3357–3374

Berker S (2014) Does evolutionary psychology show that normativity is mind-dependent? In: D’arms J, Jacobson D (eds) Moral psychology and human agency: essays on the science of ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 215–252

Bogardus T (2016) Only all naturalists should worry about only one evolutionary debunking argument. Ethics 126:636–661

Braddock M (2016) Evolutionary debunking: can moral realists explain the reliability of our moral judgments? Philos Psychol 29:844–857

Buchanan A, Powell R (2015) The limits of evolutionary explanations of morality and their implications for moral progress. Ethics 126:37–67

Clarke-Doane J (2012) Morality and mathematics: the evolutionary challenge. Ethics 122:313–340

Crow D (2016) Causal impotence and evolutionary influence: epistemological challenges for non-naturalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Pract 19:379–395

Cuneo T, Shafer-Landau R (2014) The moral fixed points. New directions for moral nonnaturalism. Philos Stud 171:399–443

Darwin C (2013) [1871] The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Wordsworth Classics, Ware

Das R (2016) Evolutionary debunking of morality: epistemological or metaphysical? Philos Stud 173:417–435

Deem MJ (2016) Dehorning the Darwinian Dilemma for normative realism. Biol Philos 31:727–746

DeScioli P, Kurzban R (2013) A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychol Bull 139:477–496

Enoch D (2010) The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism: how best to understand it, and how to cope with it. Philos Stud 148:413–438

FitzPatrick W (2014) Why there is no Darwinian Dilemma for ethical naturalism. In: Bergmann M, Kain P (eds) Challenges to moral and religious belief: disagreement and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 237–255

FitzPatrick W (2015) Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism. Philos Stud 172:883–904

Huemer M (2016) A liberal realist answer to debunking skeptics: the empirical case for realism. Philos Stud 173:1983–2010

Joyce R (2016) Reply: Confessions of a modest debunker. In: Leibowitz UD, Sinclair N (eds) Explanation in ethics and mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 124–148

Klenk M (2017) Old wine in new bottles: evolutionary debunking arguments and the Benacerraf-field challenge. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 20:781–795

Ruse M (1995) [1986] Evolutionary ethics: a phoenix arisen. In: Thompson P (ed) Issues in evolutionary ethics. SUNY Press, Buffalo, pp 225–247

Schechter J (2018) Explanatory challenges in metaethics. In: McPherson T, Plunkett D (eds) Routledge handbook of metaethics. Routledge, New York, pp 443–459

Schloss J (2014) Evolutionary accounts of morality: accounting for the normal but not the normative. In: Putnam H, Neiman S, Schloss J (eds) Understanding moral sentiments: Darwinian perspectives. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 81–121

Shafer-Landau R (2003) Moral realism: a defence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Shafer-Landau R (2012) Evolutionary debunking, moral realism and moral knowledge. J Ethics Soc Philos 7(1):1–37

Skarsaune KO (2011) Darwin and moral realism: survival of the iffiest. Philos Stud 152:229–243

Street S (2006) A Darwinian Dilemma for realist theories of value. Philos Stud 127:109–166

Street S (2008) Reply to Copp: naturalism, normativity, and the varieties of realism worth worrying about. Philos Issues 18:207–228

Street S (2016) Objectivity and truth: you’d better rethink it. In: Shafer-Landau R (ed) Oxford studies in metaethics, vol 11. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 293–334

Tersman F (2017) Moral skepticism and the benacerraf challenge. In: Machuca D (ed) Moral skepticism: new essays. Routledge, New York, pp 183–198

Wielenberg E (2010) On the evolutionary debunking of morality. Ethics 120:441–464