Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale-14

Adams, 2012, Consideration of immediate and future consequences, smoking status, and body mass index, Health Psychology, 31, 260, 10.1037/a0025790

Adewuya, 2005, Validation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screening tool for alcohol-related problems among Nigerian university students, Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40, 575, 10.1093/alcalc/agh197

Arnocky, 2014, Time perspective and sustainable behavior: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences, Environment and Behavior, 46, 556, 10.1177/0013916512474987

Asparouhov, 2009, Exploratory structural equation modeling, Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397, 10.1080/10705510903008204

Dassen, 2015, Time orientation and eating behavior: Unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health, Appetite, 91, 13, 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.020

De Meneses-Gaya, 2009, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): An updated systematic review of psychometric properties, Psychology and Neuroscience, 2, 83, 10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12

Hamilton, 2003, Time perspective and health promoting behavior in a cardiac rehabilitation population, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 130

Hevey, 2010, Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Confirmatory factor analysis, Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 654, 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.006

Hu, 1999, Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118

Joireman, 2008, Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 15, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.011

Joireman, 2012, Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272, 10.1177/0146167212449362

McKay, 2015, Back to ‘the Future’: Evidence of a Bifactor Solution for Scores on the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale, Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 395, 10.1080/00223891.2014.999338

Muthén, 2012

Reise, 2010, Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores, Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544, 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477

Rhemtulla, 2012, When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods in non-ideal conditions, Psychological Methods, 17, 354, 10.1037/a0029315

Saunders, 1993, Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II, Addiction, 88, 791, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x

Strathman, 1994, The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742

Zigmond, 1983, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361, 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x