Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3–30–300 rule

Cecil C. Konijnendijk1
1Nature Based Solutions Institute, Barcelona, Spain

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe important contributions of urban trees and green spaces to for example, climate moderation and public health have been recognized. This paper discusses guidelines and norms that promote the benefits of viewing green, living amongst green, and having easy access to green spaces for recreational use. Having trees and other vegetation in sight from one’s home, place of work, or school has important mental health and performance benefits. Local tree canopy cover is positively associated with cooling and other aspects of climate moderation. With public green spaces in proximity to one’s home stimulates regular use of these areas and results in positive impacts on mental, physical, and social health. After analyzing existing guidelines and rules for urban green space planning and provision, a new, comprehensive guideline is presented, known as the ‘3–30–300 rule’ for urban forestry. This guideline aims to provide equitable access to trees and green spaces and their benefits by setting the thresholds of having at least 3 well-established trees in view from every home, school, and place of work, no less than a 30% tree canopy in every neighbourhood; and no more than 300 m to the nearest public green space from every residence. Current implementation of this new guideline is discussed, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using this evidence-based but also clear and simple rules.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajuntament de Barcelona (2017) Trees for life: master plan for Barcelona’s trees 2017–2037.

American Forests (2021) Tree Equity Score. Ensuring tree cover in cities is equitably distributed. American Forests, Washington DC. Retrieved on 9 January 2022 from https://www.americanforests.org/tools-research-reports-and-guides/tree-equity-score/

Astell-Burt T, Feng X (2019a) Does sleep grow on trees? A longitudinal study to investigate potential prevention of insufficient sleep with different types of urban green space. SSM Population Health 10:100497

Astell-Burt T, Feng X (2019b) Association of urban green space with mental health and general health among adults in Australia. JAMA Netw Open 2(7):e198209. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8209

Astell-Burt T, Feng X (2020) Urban green space, tree canopy and prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: a multilevel longitudinal study of 46 786 Australians. Int J Epidemiol 49(3):926–933

Atlas Leefomgeving (2021) Thema Groene Leefomgeving. Accessed 10 February 2021; https://www.atlasleefomgeving.nl/thema/natuur/groene-leefomgeving

Atkins-Baker M (2021) Saanich council embraces 3–30–300 rule to improve access to green space. Victoria News June 18, 2021. Accessed on 27 July 2022 from https://www.vicnews.com/news/saanich-council-embraces-3-30-300-rule-to-improve-access-to-green-space/

Australian Capital Territory (2019) Canberra’s Living Infrastructure Plan: Cooling the City. ACT Government, Canberra

Barron S, Nitoslawski S, Wolf KL, Woo A, Desautels E, Sheppard SRJ (2019) Greening blocks: a conceptual typology of practical design interventions to integrate health and climate resilience co-benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:4241

Bosch VDMA, Mudu P, Valdas U, Barrdahl M, Kulinkina A, Staatsen B, Swart W, Kruize H, Zurlyte I, Egorov AI (2016) Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scand J Public Health 44:159–167

Bratman GN, Anderson CB, Berman MG (2019) Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances 5(7): eaax0903. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903

Bristol Green Capital Partnership (2018) New ambitious target launched to double city tree canopy cover by 2050. https://bristolgreencapital.org/new-ambitious-target-launched-double-city-tree-canopy-cover-2050/

Chan L, Hillel O, Elmqvist T, Werner P, Holman N, Mader A, Calcaterra E (2014) User’s manual on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index). National Parks Board, Singapore. Retrieved on 12 December 2021 from https://www.nparks.gov.sg/-/media/nparks-real-content/biodiversity/singapore-index/users-manual-on-the-singapore-index-on-cities-biodiversity.pdf?la=en&hash=0C08791248861170CEC096A7924ED887A078C93A.

Chi D, Aerts R, Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Bauwelinck M, Demoury C, Plusquin M, Nawrot TS, Casas L, Somers B (2022) Residential exposure to urban trees and medication sales for mood disorders and cardiovascular disease in Brussels, Belgium: an ecological study. Environmental Health Perspectives 130(5). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9924

City of Vancouver (2020) Park Board achieves target to plant 150,000 trees by 2020, directs staff to increase tree canopy to 30% by 2050. https://vancouver.ca/news-calendar/park-board-achieves-target-to-plant-150000-trees-by-2020.aspx

Cobra Groeninzicht (2022) 3–30–300 regel: Het stedelijk landschap benchmarken, waar wordt het beter? (The 3–30–300 rule: Benchmarking the urban landscape, where does it get better?). Accessed on 2 July 2022 from https://www.cobra-groeninzicht.nl/futuretrees/330300_regel/ (in Dutch).

Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Derose KP, Martinez H, Setodji C, McKenzie TL (2010) Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med 50(Suppl 1):S9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020

Devisscher T, Konijnendijk CC, Nesbitt L, Lenhart J, Salbitano F, Cheng ZC, Lwasa S, Bosch VD MA (2019) SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities—impacts on forests and forest-based livelihoods. In: Katila et al. (eds) Potential impacts of the sustainable development goals on forests and the goods and services they provide. WFSE, LUKE, Helsinki, pp. 349–385.

Dobbs C, Martinez-Harms MJ, Kendal D (2017) Ecosystem services. In: Ferrini F, Konijnendijk van den Bosch C, Fini A (eds) Routledge handbook of urban forestry. Routledge, London, pp. 51–64.

EEA (2020) Air quality in Europe—2020 report. EEA Report No. 9/2020. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Accessed 1 November 2021 from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2020-report

EEA (2021) Indicators for urban green infrastructure. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Retrieved on 15 October 2021 from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/sustainability-transitions/urban-environment/urban-green-infrastructure/indicators_for_urban-green-infrastructure

Ellicott K (2016) Raising the standard: the Green Flag Award guidance manual. Green Flag Award. Retrieved on 11 January 2021 from https://www.greenflagaward.org/SpecificPages/FlipBooks/green-flag-award-guidelines/index.html?page=2

Endreny TA (2018) Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nature Communications 9: 1160. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03622-0

Natural England (2003) Accessible natural green space standards in towns and cities: a review and toolkit for their implementation (ENRR526). Retrieved on 10 January 2022 from http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/65021

European Commission (2020) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030—Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2020) 380 final. Brussels. Accessed on 27 July 2022 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_886

FAO and Arbor Day Foundation (2021) Tree Cities of the World Program, website. Retrieved on 15 December 2021 from https://treecitiesoftheworld.org/

Frederiksberg Kommune (2018) Frederiksberg Kommunens Traepolitik. Frederiksberg. https://www.frederiksberg.dk/sites/default/files/2018-10/traepolitik.pdf

Greater London Authority (2017) Urban Greening Factor for London. Retrieved on 21 October 2021 from https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/urban_greening_factor_for_london_final_report.pdf.

Gulsrud N, Krajter Ostoić S, Faehnle M, Maric M, Paloniemi R, Pearlmutter D, Simson AJ (2017) Challenges to governing urban green infrastructure in Europe—the Case of the European Green Capital Award. In: Pearlmutter D, Calfapietra C, Samson R et al (eds) The Urban Forest. Springer, New York, pp 235–258

Haaland C, Bosch CKVD (2015) Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban Forest Urban Green 14(4):760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009

Hartig T, Mitchell R, De Vries S, Frumkin H (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health 35:207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443

Heath C, Heath D (2007) Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. Random House, New York

Hewitt CN, Ashworth K, MacKenzie AR (2019) Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ). Ambio 49:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3

Holtan MT, Dieterlen SL, Sullivan WC (2014) Social life under cover: tree canopy and social capital in Baltimore. Maryland Environ Behavior 47(5):502–525

IS Global (2021) IS Global Ranking of Cities. IS Global - Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona. Website. Accessed 15 October 2021 from https://isglobalranking.org/

Janowiak MK, Brandt LA, Wolf KL, Brady M, et al (2021) Climate adaptation actions for urban forests and human health. Gen. Tech. Rep. Nrs-203., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Madison WI.

Jarvis I, Sbihi H, Davis Z, Brauer M, Czekajlo A, Davies HW, Gergel SE, Guhn M, Jerrett M, Koehoorn M, Nesbitt L, Oberlander TF, Su J, Bosch VDMA (2022) The influence of early-life residential exposure to different vegetation types and paved surfaces on early childhood development: a population-based birth cohort study. Environ Int 163:107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107196

Jayasekare ASH, Wickramasuriya R, Perez P (2019) The price of a view: estimating the impact of view on house prices. Pac Rim Prop Res J 25(2):141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2019.1626543

Kendal D, Dobbs C, Lohr VI (2014) Global patterns of diversity in the urban forest: is there evidence to support the 10/20/30 rule? Urban Forest Urban Green 13(3):411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.004

Kluck J, Klok L, Solcerová A, Kleerekoper L, Wildschut L, Jacobs C, Loeve R (2020) The hittebestendige stad: Een koele kijk op de inrichting van de buitenruimte (The heat resistant city: A cool outlook on the design of outdoor spaces). Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Accessed on 1 July 2022 from https://www.hva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/kc-techniek/publicaties-klimaatbestendige-stad/hva_2020_hittebestendige_stad_online.pdf (in Dutch).

Kruuse A (2011) GRaBS Expert Paper 6: The Green Space Factor and the Green Points System. GRaBS project, London etc. Retrieved on 1 December 2021 from https://nextcity.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/1701256-Malmoe-Tools-c-Annika-Kruuse.pdf

Leahy I (2017) Why we no longer recommend a 40 percent urban tree canopy goal. Retrieved on 5 January 2022 from https://www.americanforests.org/blog/no-longer-recommend-40-percent-urban-tree-canopy-goal/

Lindholst AC, Bosch KVDC, Kjøller CC, Sullivan CP, Kristoffersson A, Fors H, Nilsson K (2016) Urban green space qualities reframed toward a public value management paradigm: The case of the Nordic Green Space Award. Urban Forest Urban Green 17:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.007

Lottrup L, Stigsdotter UK, Meilby H, Claudi AG (2015) The workplace window view: a determinant of office workers’ work ability and job satisfaction. Landsc Res 40(1):57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2013.829806

Marselle MR, Hartig T, Cox DTC et al (2021) Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: a conceptual framework. Environ Int 150:106420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420

Miles E (2022) Nature is a human right. DK, London

Morgenroth J, Östberg J, Bosch KDV, Nielsen AB, Hauer R, Sjöman H, Chen W, Jansson M (2016) Urban tree diversity—taking stock and looking ahead. Urban Forest Urban Green 15:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.003

Ngom R, Gosselin P, Blais C (2016) Type and proximity of green spaces are important for preventing cardiovascular morbidity and diabetes -a cross-sectional study for Quebec, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(4):423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040423

Nielsen AB, Bosch VDM, Maruthaveeran S, Bosch VDKC (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems 17:305–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1

Quite Interesting (2021) Discussion post on the 3–30–300 rule, 21 May 2021. https://www.facebook.com/OfficialQI/posts/the-3-30-300-rule-is-a-proposed-rule-in-urban-planning-that-stipulates-that-ever/4576645565683277/

Rahman MA, Moser A, Rötzer T (2019) Comparing the transpirational and shading effects of two contrasting urban tree species. Urban Ecosystems 22:683–697

Rugel EJ (2019) Connecting natural space exposure to mental health outcomes across Vancouver, Canada. PhD dissertation. The School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Santamour F (1990) Trees for urban planting: diversity, uniformity and common sense. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance 7: 57–65.

Seattle Government (2016) Seattle’s Canopy Cover. https://www.seattle.gov/trees/management/canopy-cover

Shiraishi K (2022) The inequity of distribution of urban forest and ecosystem services in Cali. Colombia Urban Forest Urban Green 67:127446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127446

Taylor K (2020) Europe has world’s highest death rate from heatwaves: study. Euraktiv, December 3, 2020. Accessed 15 October 2021 from https://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/news/europe-has-highest-share-of-global-deaths-from-heatwaves-and-air-pollution-study/

The Nature Conservancy (2017) Funding Trees for Health: An analysis of policy and finance actions to enable tree planting for public health. New York. Accessed 1 November 2021 from https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Trees4Health_FINAL.pdf

Toftager M, Ekholm O, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter U, Bentsen P, Grønbæk M, Randrup TB, Kamper-Jørgensen F (2011) Distance to green space and physical activity: a Danish national representative survey. J Phys Act Health 8(6):741–749. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.6.741

Townsend JB, Barton S (2018) The impact of ancient tree form on modern landscape preferences. Urban Forest Urban Green 34:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.004

Tubby KV, Webber JF (2010) Pests and diseases threatening urban trees under a changing climate. Forestry 83(4):451–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq027

UNECE (2022) Advancing sustainable urban and peri-urban forestry - a green approach to resilience, health, and green recovery. Policy brief. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Forests program, Geneva. Accessed 26 July 2022 from https://unece.org/forests/policy-briefs-forestry-and-timber-section

United Nations (2022) Sustainable Development Goal 11. Retrieved on 5 January 2022 from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11

UNSDG (2020) COVID-19 in and Urban World. Policy brief. Accessed 10 October 2020 from https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-covid-19-urban-world#:~:text=With%20an%20estimated%2090%20per,the%20spread%20of%20the%20virus

Van den Berg M, Wendel-Vos W, Van Poppel M (2015) Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Urban Forest Urban Green 14(4):806–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008

Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 63(2):109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5

Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forest Urban Green 6(4):199–212

Watkins SL, Gerrish E (2018) The relationship between urban forests and race: a meta-analysis. J Environ Manage 209:152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.021

Weinbrenner H, Breithut J, Hebermehl W (2021) The forest has become our new living room”—The critical importance of urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.672909/full

WHO (2016) Urban green spaces and health: a review of evidence. World Health Organization—Regional Office for Europe, Bonn.

WHO (2017) Urban green spaces: A brief for action. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Bonn. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/urban-health/publications/2017/urban-green-spaces-a-brief-for-action-2017

Wüstemann H, Kalisch D (2016) Towards a national indicator for urban green space provision and environmental inequalities in Germany: method and findings. SFB 649 Discussion Paper No. 2016–022. Humboldt University of Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649 - Economic Risk, Berlin.

Yan X, He M, Guo Y, Wang Y, Han J, Li Q (2021) Study on volatile organic compounds of tree species and the influence on ozone and secondary organic aerosol. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences 791:012199

Zhou W, Huang G, Pickett STA (2021) Urban tree canopy has greater cooling effects in socially vulnerable communities in the US. One Earth 4(12):1764–1775

Ziter CD, Pedersen EJ, Kucharik CJ, Turner MG (2019) Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(15):7575–7580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817561116