Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds

Matthiessen, 2007, Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial, Ann Surg, 246, 207, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024 Hackam, 1995, Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors, Can J Surg, 38, 144 Phang, 1999, Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown, Am J Surg, 177, 463, 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00091-4 Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum;48:243-250. Van de Pavoordt, 1987, The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases, Int J Colorectal Dis, 2, 214, 10.1007/BF01649508 Mileski, 1990, Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy and end colostomy, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 171, 17 Bucknall, 1982, Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies, Br Med J, 284, 931, 10.1136/bmj.284.6320.931 Shulkin, 1993, The economic impact of infections. An analysis of hospital costs and charges in surgical patients with cancer, Arch Surg, 128, 449, 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420160091015 Feinberg, 1987, Complications of loop ileostomy, Am J Surg, 153, 102, 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90209-1 Lewis P, Bartolo DC. Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl1990;72:263–5. Khoo, 1994, Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion, Am J Surg, 167, 519, 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90249-6 Wexner, 1993, Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion, Dis Colon Rectum, 36, 349, 10.1007/BF02053937 Garcia-Botello, 2004, A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown, Dig Surg, 440, 10.1159/000083471 Pittman, 1985, Complications of colostomy closure, Dis Colon Rectum, 28, 836, 10.1007/BF02555488 Vermulst, 2006, Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure: management of wound infections is easy without (long-term) complications, Dig Surg, 23, 255, 10.1159/000095399 Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M. Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol;9:206–208. Imada, 2013, Efficacy of subcutaneous Penrose drains for surgical site infections in colorectal surgery, World J Gastrointest Surg, 5, 110, 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i4.110 Banerjee A. Purse-string skin closure after stoma reversal. Dis Colon Rectum;40:993–994. Sutton, 2002, A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure, ANZ J Surg, 72, 766, 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02514.x Horan, 2008, CDC/NHSC surveillance definition of health care associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting, Am J Infect Contr, 36, 309, 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002 Milanchi, 2009, Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation, Dis Colon Rectum, 52, 469, 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819acc90 Reid, 2010, Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds, Br J Surg, 97, 1511, 10.1002/bjs.7151 Marquez, 2010, Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture, World J Surg, 34, 2877, 10.1007/s00268-010-0753-4 Lee, 2011, Conventional linear versus purse-string skin closure after loop ileostomy reversal: comparison of Wound infection rates and operative outcomes, J Korean Soc Coloproctol, 27, 58, 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.58 Mirbagheri, 2013, Factors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates, Tech Coloproctol, 17, 215, 10.1007/s10151-012-0908-4 Camacho-Mauries, 2013, Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection, Dis Colon Rectum, 56, 205, 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827888f6 Dusch, 2013, Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture, Colorectal Dis, 15, 1033, 10.1111/codi.12211 Klink, 2013, Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: retrospective cohort study, Int J Surg, 11, 1123, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.003 Li, 2014, Prevalence of surgical site infection at the stoma site following four skin closure techniques: a retrospective cohort study, Dig Surg, 31, 73, 10.1159/000354426 Habbe, 2014, The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates - a single high-volume centre experience, Int J Colorectal Dis, 29, 709, 10.1007/s00384-013-1822-6 Lee, 2014, Purse-string closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections, Dis Colon Rectum, 57, 1282, 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000209 Yoon, 2015, Clinical trial on the incidence of wound infection and patient satisfaction after stoma closure: comparison of two skin closure techniques, Ann Coloproctol, 31, 29, 10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.29 Wada, 2015, Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: a retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal, Mol Clin Oncol, 3, 619, 10.3892/mco.2015.505 Alvandipour, 2016, Purse-string versus linear conventional skin wound closure of an ileostomy: a randomized clinical trial, Ann Coloproctol, 32, 144, 10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.144 Hsieh, 2015, Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure following stoma reversal to reduce surgical site infection rate: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Dis Colon Rectum, 58, 808, 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000401