Evidence, Uncertainty, and Wicked Problems in Climate Change Decision Making in Australia

SAGE Publications - Tập 32 Số 4 - Trang 663-679 - 2014
Brian Head1
1Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia

Tóm tắt

Policy makers have had great difficulty in understanding and responding effectively to complex or ‘wicked’ problems. Contentious policy initiatives are hard to implement when knowledge bases are divergent and incomplete, when short-term interests conflict with long-term benefits, and when problems are construed or framed in very different ways. These features of wicked problems have been central in Australian debates about initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to address the likely impacts of climate change. Given the closely interconnected nature of social, technical, legal—political, economic, and natural-resource issues, the political challenges of managing adaptive change are numerous. A strategic adaptation framework is necessary to complement ongoing mitigation efforts directed at greenhouse gas reduction. Strategic innovation requires pluralistic and adaptive processes, such as multistakeholder forums, consideration of scenario analyses, and the use of boundary organizations. In light of the highly contested nature of the issues, the multiple bases of knowledge and interests, and the provisional nature of adaptation choices, there are major policy governance challenges facing the Australian government and stakeholders in grappling with climate adaptation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal A, 2009, discussion paper

AICD, 2008, Boardroom Report, 6

Allen Consulting Group, 2004 Responding to Climate Change: An Issues Paper Melbourne

Allen Consulting Group, 2005, Climate Change: Risk and Vulnerability: Promoting an Efficient Adaptation Response in Australia. Final Report

10.1068/c0941

APSC, 2007, Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective

Australian Government, Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra

1992 National Greenhouse Strategy

1998 National Greenhouse Policy

2007a National Climate Change Adaptation Framework

2007b Climate Change Adaptation Action for Local Government

10.1093/0199259259.001.0001

10.1017/CBO9780511814617

10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001

10.1017/CBO9780511490880

Bommert B, 2010, International Public Management Review, 11, 15

10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005

10.1068/c9905j

10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002

10.1080/0964401042000310178

10.3197/096327103129341261

10.1177/0885412202239138

10.1073/pnas.1231332100

CCP, 2008, “Local government action on climate change: CCP Australia measures evaluation report 2008”, Cities for Climate Protection, http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=ccp-measures08

10.1068/c10217

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.003

Douglas M, 1982, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.06.006

Dovers S, 2003, Managing Australia's Environment

10.1002/wcc.100

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.001

10.1080/09644016.2012.698887

10.1111/0033-3352.00033

10.1093/019924264X.001.0001

10.1068/c0790s

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.010

10.1016/0016-3287(94)90029-9

Garnaut R, 2008, Arndt Memorial Lecture, 5 June

Garnaut R, 2008, Garnaut Climate Change Review

10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00645.x

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004

Godet M, 1994, From Anticipation to Action: A Handbook of Strategic Prospective

Goldsmith S, 2004, Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector

10.1177/016224390102600401

Hamalainen T, 2011, working paper

10.1080/10361140701513570

10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x

Head B W, 2009, Climate Change in Regional Australia: Social Learning and Adaptation, 14

10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001

10.1108/17574321011028954

10.1002/pad.599

10.1111/j.1757-7802.2011.01038.x

Head B W, 2008, presentation to International Research Society for Public Management conference

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.001

IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report

Janicke M, 1999, Planning Sustainability, 175

10.1016/j.eist.2011.10.005

10.1068/cav6

10.1287/orsc.1070.0340

Kettl D, 2009, The Next Government of the United States: Why our Institutions Fail Us and How to Fix Them

Kingdon J, 1995, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2

10.4324/9780203643457

10.1080/17524030903529749

Lazarus R J, 2009, Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153

Lewicki R J, 2003, Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts

LGAQ, 2007, Adapting to Climate Change: A Queensland Local Government Guide

10.2307/976178

10.1016/j.futures.2006.03.005

10.1068/c0797j

Mandell M, 2001, Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management

10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01803.x

10.1002/wcc.11

Moser S C, 2006, Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change

Mulgan G, 2009, The Art of Public Strategy: Mobilizing Power and Knowledge for the Common Good

10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23

10.1068/c0606j

10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

10.1080/13876980500319204

10.1080/09644010903156976

10.1038/445597a

10.1057/9780230512641

Preston B L, 2006, report for the Australian Business Roundtable on Climate Change

Productivity Commission, 2012, “Barriers to effective climate change adaptation, draft report”, Canberra

10.2166/wst.2005.0145

10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.001

10.1007/BF01405730

SCCG, 2011, “Submissions”

Schlager E C, 2011, Navigating Climate Change Policy: The Opportunities of Federalism

Schon D A, 1994, Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies

10.1017/CBO9780511817434

10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00003.x

10.4135/9781452231389

10.1080/09644016.2011.538167

10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.004

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002

10.1007/s11269-006-9052-0

10.1057/9780230624887

10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1

Warner J, 2010, Water Alternatives, 3, 137

10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x