Evaluation use and involvement of internal stakeholders: The case of a new non-degree online program in Brazil

Studies in Educational Evaluation - Tập 36 - Trang 69-81 - 2010
Edgard B. Cornachione1,2, Maria R. Trombetta1, Silvia P.C. Casa Nova1
1University of Sao Paulo, College of Economics, Business and Accounting, Department of Accounting and Actuarial Sciences, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 908 (FEA3/113), Sao Paulo, SP, 05508-010, Brazil
2University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Education, Department of Human Resource Education, 351 Education Building, 1310 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alkin, 2004, Context-adapted utilization, 293 American Evaluation Association [AEA]. (2007). Guiding principles for evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(2), 129–130. CAPES [Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior]. (2008). GeoCapes Statistics (Geocapes dados estatísticos). Brasilia, DF: Brazilian Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://geocapes.capes.gov.br/geocapesds/#app=c684&da7a-selectedIndex=0&5317-selectedIndex=0&c0ef-selectedIndex=0. Cousins, J. B. (1995). Assessing program needs using participatory evaluation: A comparison of high and marginal success cases. In J. B. Cousins, & L. M. Earls (Eds.), Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning (pp. 55–71). Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer. Greene, 2000, The promise of social program evaluation Greene, 2001, Editor's notes, 1 INEP [Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anisio Teixeira]. (2009). Technical Draft: 2008 Postsecondary education in Brazil (Resumo técnico: Censo da educação superior 2008—dados preliminares). Brasilia, DF: Brazilian Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.inep.gov.br/download/censo/2008/resumo_tecnico_2008_15_12_09.pdf. King, J. A. (1995). Involving practitioners in evaluation studies: How viable is collaborative valuation in schools? In J. B. Cousins, & L. M. Earls (Eds.), Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning (pp. 86–102). Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer. Patton, 1988, The evaluator's responsibility for utilization, Evaluation Practice, 9, 5, 10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80059-X Patton, 1988, How primary is your identity as an evaluator?, Evaluation Practice, 9, 87, 10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80080-1 Patton, 1997 Patton, 2004, The roots of utilization-focused evaluation, 276 Russ-Eft, 2001 Stake, R. E. (1973, reprinted in 1991). Excerpts from “Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation.” Evaluation Practice, 12, 63–76. Stake, 1995 Stake, 2004 Stake, 2004, Stake and responsive evaluation, 203 Stake, 2004, How far dare an evaluator go toward saving the world?, American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 103, 10.1177/109821400402500108 Taut, 2008, What have we learned about stakeholder involvement in program evaluation?, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 224, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.10.007 World Bank. (2000). Higher education in developing countries: Peril and promise. Washington, DC: The World Bank. World Bank. (2005). Report on the observance of standards and codes. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from: http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/rosc_aa_bra.pdf. Yin, 1993