Evaluation of the performance of a high-resolution time-of-flight PET system dedicated to the head and breast according to NEMA NU 2-2012 standard

EJNMMI Physics - Tập 9 Số 1
Daisuke Morimoto‐Ishikawa1, Kohei Hanaoka1, Shota Watanabe1, Takahiro Yamada1, Yoshiyuki Yamakawa2, Suzuka Minagawa2, Shiho Takenouchi2, A. Ohtani2, Tetsuro Mizuta2, Hayato Kaida3,1, Kazunari Ishii3,1
1Division of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Japan
2Medical Systems Division, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan
3Department of Radiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background This study evaluated the physical performance of a positron emission tomography (PET) system dedicated to the head and breast according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU2-2012 standard. Methods The spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count rate characteristics, corrections for count losses and randoms, and image quality of the system were determined. All measurements were performed according to the NEMA NU2-2012 acquisition protocols, but image quality was assessed using a brain-sized phantom. Furthermore, scans of the three-dimensional (3D) Hoffmann brain phantom and mini-Derenzo phantom were acquired to allow visual evaluation of the imaging performance for small structures. Results The tangential, radial, and axial full width at half maximum (FWHM) at a 10-mm offset in half the axial field of view were measured as 2.3, 2.5, and 2.9 mm, respectively. The average system sensitivity at the center of the field of view and at a 10-cm radial offset was 7.18 and 8.65 cps/kBq, respectively. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 35.2 kcps at 4.8 kBq/ml. The corresponding scatter fraction at the peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 46.8%. The peak true rate and scatter fraction at 8.6 kBq/ml were 127.8 kcps and 54.3%, respectively. The percent contrast value for a 10-mm sphere was approximately 50%. On the 3D Hoffman brain phantom image, the structures of the thin layers composing the phantom were visualized on the sagittal and coronal images. On the mini-Derenzo phantom, each of the 1.6-mm rods was clearly visualized. Conclusion Taken together, these results indicate that the head- and breast-dedicated PET system has high resolution and is well suited for clinical PET imaging.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Beyer T, Czernin J, Freudenberg LS. Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):303–10.

Vandenberghe S, Mikhaylova E, D’Hoe E, Mollet P, Karp JS. Recent developments in time-of-flight PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):3.

Rausch I, Ruiz A, Valverde-Pascual I, Cal-Gonzalez J, Beyer T, Carrio I. Performance evaluation of the vereos PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(4):561–7.

van Sluis J, de Jong J, Schaar J, Noordzij W, van Snick P, Dierckx R, et al. Performance characteristics of the digital biograph vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):1031–6.

Chen S, Hu P, Gu Y, Yu H, Shi H. Performance characteristics of the digital uMI550 PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2018 standard. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7(1):43.

Phelps ME. PET: the merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(4):661–81.

Silverman DH, Small GW, Chang CY, Lu CS, Kung De Aburto MA, Chen W, et al. Positron emission tomography in evaluation of dementia: regional brain metabolism and long-term outcome. JAMA. 2001;286(17):2120–7.

Fowler AM. A molecular approach to breast imaging. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(2):177–80.

Catana C. Development of dedicated brain PET imaging devices: recent advances and future perspectives. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(8):1044–52.

Satoh Y, Motosugi U, Omiya Y, Onishi H. Unexpected abnormal uptake in the breasts at dedicated breast PET: incidentally detected small cancers or nonmalignant features? Am J Roentgenol. 2018;212(2):443–9.

NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2012. Performance Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs (PET). Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2012.

JESRA X-0073*G-2019. Performance evaluation of positron emission tomographs. Japan: Japanese Engineering Standards of Radiological Apparatus; 2019.

Mizuta T, Kobayashi T, Yamakawa Y, Hanaoka K, Watanabe S, Morimoto-Ishikawa D, et al. Initial evaluation of a new maximum-likelihood attenuation correction factor-based attenuation correction for time-of-flight brain PET. Ann Nucl Med. 2022;36:420–6.

Nakayama T, Kudo H (eds) Derivation and implementation of ordered-subsets algorithms for list-mode PET data. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium conference record, 2005; 2005 23–29 Oct. 2005.

Won JY, Park H, Lee S, Son JW, Chung Y, Ko GB, et al. Development and initial results of a brain PET insert for simultaneous 7-tesla PET/MRI using an FPGA-only signal digitization method. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021;40(6):1579–90.

Moliner L, Rodriguez-Alvarez MJ, Catret JV, Gonzalez A, Ilisie V, Benlloch JM. NEMA performance evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15484.

Nishikido F, Fujiwara M, Tashima H, Akram MSH, Suga M, Obata T, et al. Development of a full-ring “add-on PET” prototype: a head coil with DOI-PET detectors for integrated PET/MRI. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2017;863:55–61.

Onishi Y, Isobe T, Ito M, Hashimoto F, Omura T, Yoshikawa E. Performance evaluation of dedicated brain PET scanner with motion correction system. Ann Nucl Med. 2022;36(8):746–55.

Miyake KK, Matsumoto K, Inoue M, Nakamoto Y, Kanao S, Oishi T, et al. Performance evaluation of a new dedicated breast PET scanner using NEMA NU4-2008 standards. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(7):1198–203.

Bao Q, Newport D, Chen M, Stout DB, Chatziioannou AF. Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(3):401–8.