Evaluation of the effectiveness of surveillance policies to control the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo, Brazil
Tóm tắt
Surveillance efforts are essential to pandemic control, especially where the state is the primary health provider, such as Brazil. When public health testing guidelines limit molecular tests, there are reductions in detection efforts aimed at early recognition, isolation, and treatment of those infected with the virus. This study evaluates the effectiveness of surveillance policies to control the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis with a segmented regression model to analyze if changes in the state’s guidelines improved RT-PCR testing outcomes in Brazil’s most affluent and largest state, São Paulo. Anonymized daily data on the RT-PCR tests conducted in public laboratories belonging to the state-wide network from March 1, 2020 to June 5, 2021 were extracted from the Sao Paulo State open-source database, while the data on the genomic sequences were obtained from GISAID. We then aggregated these data for the 17 regional health departments in the state to evaluate regional-level outcomes. The public health system restricted RT-PCR testing to hospitalized cases in the first months. Testing was expanded to permit symptomatic testing of non-hospitalized persons only in July 2020, but a statistically significant increase in surveillance efforts was not observed. Case definition was expanded to allow case confirmation based on clinical, laboratory and image data criteria other than an RT-PCR test without increasing the testing effort for asymptomatic suspicious cases in September 2020. There was an increase in the mean volume of testing in each RHD, but the test positivity rate increased due to insufficient testing expansion. Results also show an uneven improvement in testing outcomes following these changes across the state’s regional health departments. Evidence suggests that lower RT-PCR testing and genomic surveillance efforts are associated with areas characterized by a higher population concentration and a greater population reliance on the public health system. Our results highlight the need to structure health surveillance and information systems for disease control and prevention in emergency settings considering local demographics and vulnerabilities. In high prevalence settings, efforts at identifying and including vulnerable populations in routine and enhanced surveillance programs during COVID-19 must be significantly improved.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kim S, Castro MC. Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 and government response in South Korea (as of May 31, 2020). Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:328–33.
Summers J, Cheng H-Y, Lin H-H, Barnard LT, Kvalsvig A, Wilson N, Baker MG. Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020;4:100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044.
Crozier A, Rajan S, Buchan I, McKee M. Put to the test: use of rapid testing technologies for covid-19. BMJ. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n208.
Pitzer VE, Chitwood M, Havumaki J, et al. The impact of changes in diagnostic testing practices on estimates of COVID-19 transmission in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(9):1908–17.
Vandenberg O, Martiny D, Rochas O, van Belkum A, Kozlakidis Z. Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(3):171–83.
Novelli G, Biancolella M, Mehrian-Shai R, et al. COVID-19 one year into the pandemic: from genetics and genomics to therapy, vaccination, and policy. Hum Genom. 2021;15(1):1–13.
Giri AK, Rana DR. Charting the challenges behind the testing of COVID-19 in developing countries: Nepal as a case study. Biosaf Health. 2020;2(2):53–6.
Werneck GL, Porto LC, Sena A, da Costa O, Junior F, Cavalcanti AC, Santos ÂMG, Secco DA, Silva M, Mariani D, Chieppe A, Tanuri A. The incidence and geographical spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil based on RT-PCR test results. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0779-2020.
Ranzani OT, Bastos LS, Gelli JGM, et al. Characterisation of the first 250 000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(4):407–18.
Johns Hopkins University. Coronavirus Resource Center. 2021.
Castro MC, Kim S, Barberia L, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil. Science. 2021;372(6544):821–6.
Fundação Estadual Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados (SEADE). Data from: Sistema de projeções populacionais para os municípios do estado de São Paulo. 2020.
IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistical). National accounts. Available at: https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/economic/national-accounts.html. (Last accessed 3 Feb 2022).
Brazil. Ministry of Health. DATASUS. Available at: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/. (Last accessed 3 Feb 2022).
Brazil. Lei 8080 de 19 de setembro de 1990. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8080.htm. (Last accessed 3 Feb 2022).
Wayne F, Roderick PM. Cross-sectional time series designs: a general transformation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1991;26(2):247–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_3.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy: considerations for non-healthcare workplaces. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/testing-non-healthcare-workplaces.html. (Last accessed 13 Sep 2021).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Evaluating case investigation and contact tracing success. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/contact-tracing-plan/evaluating-success.html. (Last accessed 13 Sep 2021).
European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Guidance for representative and targeted genomic SARS-CoV-2 monitoring. 2021. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/ecdc-releases-new-dashboard-sars-cov-2-variants. (Last accessed 13 Sep 2021)
World Health Organization (WHO). Public health criteria to adjust public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19 (Version from 12 May 2020). 2020.
World Health Organization (WHO). Considerations for implementing and adjusting public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19 (Version 14 June 2021). 2021.
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Diretrizes laboratoriais para detecção e diagnóstico de infecção pelo vírus da COVID-19. 2020. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52523/OPASIMSPHECOVID19200038_por.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Last accessed 31 Aug 2021)
Leal FE, Mendes-Correa MC, Buss LF, et al. Clinical features and natural history of the first 2073 suspected COVID-19 cases in the Corona São Caetano primary care programme: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(1):e042745.
Harvard Global Health Institute (HGHI). Pandemics explained: unlocking evidence for better decision making. 2020. https://globalepidemics.org/key-metrics-for-covid-suppression/ (Last accessed 13 Sep 2021)
Fiocruz-Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (ICICT). MonitoraCovid-19. https://bigdata-covid19.icict.fiocruz.br/ (Last accessed 31 Aug 2021)
São Paulo State Government. Resolução SS - 28, de 17-3-2020, published on March 17, 2020. Available at https://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E_R-SS-CGOF-28_170320-1.pdf (February 9, 2022).
São Paulo State Government. Deliberação CIB - 55, de 1º-7–2020, published on July 1, 2020. Available at http://saude.piracicaba.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Delibera%C3%A7%C3%A3o-CIB-n%C2%BA.-552020.pdf. (9 Feb 2022).
Brazil, Ministry of Health. Guia de Vigilância Epidemiológica – Emergência de Saúde Pública de Importância Nacional pela Doença pelo Coronavírus 2019, published on 5 Aug 2020
Brazil, Ministry of Health. Vigilância genômica do vírus SARS-CoV-2 no âmbito da SVS/MS, published on February 20, 2021. Available at https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/coronavirus/publicacoes-tecnicas/guias-e-planos/vigilancia-genomica-do-virus-sars-cov-2. (9 Feb 2022).
Governo de São Paulo. Data from: Sistema de Monitoramento Inteligente - SIMI. 2021.
Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID). Data from: Genomic epidemiology of hCoV-19. 2021.
Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. Stand Genom Sci. 2015;15(2):480–500.
Candido DS, Claro IM, De Jesus JG, et al. Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil. Science. 2020;369(6508):1255–60.
Instituto Butantan. Governo de São Paulo lança plataforma de laboratórios para diagnóstico de Covid-19. 2020;
Ribeiro KB, Ribeiro AF, de Sousa Mascena Veras MA, de Castro MC. Social inequalities and COVID-19 mortality in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(3):732–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab022.
Barberia LG, Cantarelli LGR, de Faria Oliveira MLC, de Paula Moreira N, Rosa ISC. The Effect of state-level social distancing policy stringency on mobility in the states of Brazil. Revista de Administração Pública. 2021;55(1):27–49. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200549.
Mina MJ, Andersen KG. COVID-19 testing: one size does not fit all. Science. 2021;371(6525):126–7.
Mina MJ, Peto TE, García-Fiñana M, Semple MG, Buchan IE. Clarifying the evidence on SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests in public health responses to COVID-19. Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1425–7.
Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(4):e488–96.