Thombre AG. Assessment of the feasibility of oral controlled release in an exploratory development setting. Drug Dis Today. 2005;10:1159–66.
Haan PD, Lerk CF. Oral controlled release dosage forms: a review. Pharm World Sci. 1984;6:57–67.
Roy P, Shahiwala A. Multiparticulate formulation approach to pulsatile drug delivery: current perspectives. J Control Rel. 2009;134:74–80.
Khan MA, Karnachi AA, Singh SK, Sastry SV, Kislalioglu SM, Bolto S. Controlled release coprecipitates: formulation considerations. J Con Rel. 1995;37:132–41.
Rane M, Parmar J, Siahboomi AR. Hydrophilic matrices for oral extended release: influence of fillers on drug release from HPMC matrices. Pharma Times. 2010;42:41–5.
Miranda A, Millan M, Caraballo I. Study of the critical points of HPMC hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2006;311:75–81.
Lee BJ, Ryu SG, Cui JH. Formulation and release characteristics of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrix tablet containing melatonin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;25:493–501.
Gaston J, Wallick D. Effect of filler type on the stability of PEO in a hydrophilic matrix tablet. Dow Wolff cellulosics. 2008;131:435–76.
Dimitrov M, Lambov N. Study of verapamil hydrochloride release from compressed hydrophilic Polyox-WSR tablets. Int J Pharm. 1999;189:105–11.
Yang L, Heatley F, Blease TG, Thompson R. A study of the mechanism of the oxidative thermal degradation of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) using 1H- and 13C-NMR. Eur Poly J. 1996;32:535–7.
Kim CJ. Drug release from compressed hydrophilic polyox®-WSR tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:303–6.
Kiss D, Suvegh K, Zelko R. The effect of storage and active ingredient properties on the drug release profile of polyethylene oxide matrix tablets. Carbo Poly. 2008;74:930–3.
Yasser EM, Sami N. Hydrophilic matrices: application of placket-Burman screening design to model the effect of POLYOX-carbopol blends on drug release. Int J Pharm. 2006;309:163–70.
Maggie L, Segale L, Torre ML, Machiste EO, Conte U. Dissolution behaviour of hydrophilic matrix tablets containing two different polyethylene oxides (PEOs) for the controlled release of a water-soluble drug, dimensionality study. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1113–9.
Petrovi’c J, Svetlana I, Gabriele B, Jelena P, Zorica D. Application of dynamic neutral networks in the modelling of drug release from polyethylene oxide matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;38:172–80.
Pielichowski K, Flejtuch K. Non-oxidative thermal degradation of poly(ethylene oxide): kinetic and thermoanalytical study. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2005;73:131–8.
Khan KA. Concept of dissolution efficiency. J Pharm Sci. 1975;271:48–9.
USP Pharmacopoeia 26. National Formulary 21. Rockville: USP Convention; 2003. p. 320.
Engineer S, Shao ZJ, Khagani NA. The effect of temperature on the hardness of sustained release diphenhydramin HCl. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30:1089–94.
Crowley MM, Zhang F, Koleng JJ, McGinity JW. Stability of polyethylene oxide in matrix tablets prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4241–8.
Liu L, Ku J, Khang G, Lee B, Rhee JM, Le HB. Nifedip in controlled delivery by sandwiched osmotic tablet system. J Control Rel. 2000;68:145–56.
Lapidus H, Lordi NG. Some factors affecting the release of water soluble drugs from compressed hydrophilic matrices. J Pharm Sci. 1966;55:840–3.
Longer MA, Robinson JR. Sustained-release drug delivery systems. In: Gennaro AR, editor. Remington’s pharmaceutical sciences. 18th ed. New York: Mark Easton publishing company; 1990. p. 1676.
Perkin E. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): a beginner’s guide. 2010, pp. 3–15.
Shojaee S, Cumming I, Kaialy W, Nokhodchi A. The influence of vitamin E succinate on the stability of polyethyleneoxide PEO controlled release matrix tablets. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2013a;111:486–92.
Shojaee S, Asare-Addo K, Kaialy W, Nokhodchi A, Cumming I. An investigation into the stabilization of diltiazem HCl release from matrices made from aged polyox powders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013b;14(3):1190–8.
Dow. Degradation of Water-Soluble Resins, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, USA, 2002.
Bigger SW, Scheirs J, Delatycki O, Billingham NC. Effects of molecular weight and thermal oxidation on the dynamic mechanical response of poly (ethylene oxide). Poly Int. 1991;26:181–6.
Efentakis M, Vlachou M. Evaluation of high molecular weight poly(oxyethylene) (polyox) polymer: studies of flow properties and release rates of furosemide and captopril from controlled-release hard gelatin capsules. Pharm Dev Technol. 2000;5:339–46.
Malah Y, Nazzal S. Hydrophilic matrices: application of placket–Burman screening design to model the effect of polyox–carbopol blends on drug release. Int J Pharm. 2006;309:163–70.
Sarisuta N, Kumpugdee M, Müller BW, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Physico-chemical characterization of interactions between erythromycin and various film polymers. Int J Pharm. 1999;186:109–18.
Emeji MO, Kunle OO, Ofoefule SI. The effect of molecular size of carboxymethylcellulose on the rate of hydration, matrix erosion and drug release. Drug Delivery Technology. 2005;5:56–60.
Heng PS, Wan LSC, Wong LF. Relationship between swelling and drug release in a hydrophilic matrix. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19:1201–10.
Cho K, Jeong JC, Lee J. Effects of crystalline microstructure on drug release behaviour of poly (q-caprolactone) microspheres. J Control Rel. 2003;92:249–58.