Evaluation of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology specialists’ preferences for hand hygiene: analysis using the multi-attribute utility theory and the analytic hierarchy process methods

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making - Tập 17 - Trang 1-10 - 2017
Aslı Suner1, Ozlem Ege Oruc2, Cagri Buke3,4, Hacer Deniz Ozkaya5, Gul Kitapcioglu1
1Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
2Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
3Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
4Current address: Department of Infectious Diseases, Yeditepe University Hospital, Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey
5Department of Infectious Diseases, Cigli Regional Education Hospital, İzmir, Turkey

Tóm tắt

Hand hygiene is one of the most effective attempts to control nosocomial infections, and it is an important measure to avoid the transmission of pathogens. However, the compliance of healthcare workers (HCWs) with hand washing is still poor worldwide. Herein, we aimed to determine the best hand hygiene preference of the infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (IDCM) specialists to prevent transmission of microorganisms from one patient to another. Expert opinions regarding the criteria that influence the best hand hygiene preference were collected through a questionnaire via face-to-face interviews. Afterwards, these opinions were examined with two widely used multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods, the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A total of 15 IDCM specialist opinions were collected from diverse private and public hospitals located in İzmir, Turkey. The mean age of the participants was 49.73 ± 8.46, and the mean experience year of the participants in their fields was 17.67 ± 11.98. The findings that we obtained through two distinct decision making methods, the MAUT and the AHP, suggest that alcohol-based antiseptic solution (ABAS) has the highest utility (0.86) and priority (0.69) among the experts’ choices. In conclusion, the MAUT and the AHP, decision models developed here indicate that rubbing the hands with ABAS is the most favorable choice for IDCM specialists to prevent nosocomial infection.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Tartari E, Abbas M, Pires D, de Kraker MEA, Pittet D, World Health Organization SAVE LIVES. Clean your hands global campaign-‘fight antibiotic resistance-it’s in your hands. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017; Mathur P. Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134:611–20. Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D, Lubell Y, Lee AS, Harbarth S, et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351:h3728. Pittet D, Boyce JM. Hand hygiene and patient care: pursuing the Semmelweis legacy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:9–20. Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force. Am J Infect Control. 2002;30:S1–46. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Boyce J. The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:611–22. Karaaslan A, Kepenekli Kadayifci E, Atıcı S, Sili U, Soysal A, Çulha G, et al. Compliance of healthcare workers with hand hygiene practices in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: overt observation. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2014;2014:1–5. Ehrenkranz NJ, Alfonso BC. Failure of bland soap handwash to prevent hand transfer of patient bacteria to urethral catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:654–62. Longtin Y, Sax H, Allegranzi B, Schneider F, Pittet D. Videos in clinical medicine. Hand hygiene. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:e24. Chung S, Kim S, Kim J, Sohn K. Use of multiattribute utility theory for formulary management in a health system. Am J Heal Pharm. 2010;67:128–35. Chang K-Y, Chan K-H, Chang S-H, Yang M-C, Chen TH-H. Decision analysis for epidural labor analgesia with multiattribute utility (MAU) model. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:265–72. Bettinger TL, Shuler G, Jones DR, Wilson JP. Schizophrenia: multi-attribute utility theory approach to selection of atypical antipsychotics. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:201–7. Hodder SC, Edwards MJ, Brickley MR, Shepherd JP. Multiattribute utility assessment of outcomes of treatment for head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:898–902. Giauque WC, Peebles TC. Application of multidimensional utility theory in determining optimal test-treatment strategies for streptococcal sore throat and rheumatic fever. Oper Res. 1976;24:933–50. Carter WB. Psychology and decision making: modelling health behavior with multiattribute utility theory. J Dent Educ. 1992;56:800–7. Carter WB, Beach LR, Inui TS. The flu shot study: using multiattribute utility theory to design a vaccination intervention. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1986;38:378–91. Baker J, McKnew M, Gulledge TR, Ringuest JL. An application of multiattribute utility theory to the planning of emergency medical services. Socio Econ Plan Sci. 1984;18:273–80. Lee I-J, Huang S-Y, Tsou M-Y, Chan K-H, Chang K-Y. Decision analysis for a data collection system of patient-controlled analgesia with a multi-attribute utility model. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2010;73:533–9. Adunlin G, Diaby V, Xiao H. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Health Expect. 2015;18:1894–905. Ashour OM, Okudan Kremer GE. A simulation analysis of the impact of FAHP?MAUT triage algorithm on the emergency department performance measures. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40:177–87. Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Kriza C. Niederl?Nder C, Kolominsky-Rabas P. Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:262. Schmidt K, Aumann I, Hollander I, Damm K, von der Schulenburg J-MG. Applying the analytic hierarchy process in healthcare research: a systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:112. Liberatore M, Nydick R. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;189:194–207. Suner A, Çelikoğlu CC, Dicle O, Sökmen S. Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer. Artif Intell Med. 2012;56:59–68. Suner A, Karakülah G, Dicle O, Sökmen S, Çelikoğlu CC. CorRECTreatment: a web-based decision support tool for rectal cancer treatment that uses the analytic hierarchy process and decision tree. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6:56–74. Girou E. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2002;325:362. Bischoff WE, Reynolds TM, Sessler CN, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP. Handwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1017–21. Harris A, Samore M, Nafziger R, DiRosario K, Roghmann M, Carmeli Y. A survey on handwashing practices and opinions of healthcare workers. J. Hosp. Infect. 2000;45:318–21. Naikoba S, Hayward A. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers - a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2001;47:173–80. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30. Fishburn PC. Letter to the editor?Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: application to priorities and assignments. Oper Res. 1967;15:537–42. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives–preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. Saaty TL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 1977;15:234–81. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1:83. Saaty RW. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model. 1987;9:161–76. Zahedi F. The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces (Providence). 1986;16:96–108. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 1990;48:9–26. Bhushan N, Rai K. Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process: Springer; 2004. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006. Maury E, Alzieu M, Baudel JL, Haram N, Barbut F, Guidet B, et al. Availability of an alcohol solution can improve hand disinfection compliance in an intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:324–7. Pittet D, Dharan S, Touveneau S, Sauvan V, Perneger TV. Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:821. Zaragoza M, Sallés M, Gomez J, Bayas JM, Trilla A. Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:258–61. Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:3578–94. Zardari NH, Ahmed K, Shirazi SM, Yusop ZB. Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. Kim S-K, Song O. A MAUT approach for selecting a dismantling scenario for the thermal column in KRR-1. Ann Nucl Energy. 2009;36:145–50.