Evaluation of enrichment method for the detection of <i><scp>V</scp>ibrio cholerae </i><scp>O</scp>1 using a rapid dipstick test in <scp>B</scp>angladesh

Tropical Medicine and International Health - Tập 19 Số 3 - Trang 301-307 - 2014
Christine Marie George1, R. Bradley Sack2, David A. Sack1, R. Bradley Sack1, KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman2, Andrew S. Azman3, Shirajum Monira2, Shahnawaz Ahmed2, Zillur Rahman2, Md. Toslim Mahmud2, Munshi Mustafiz2, Munirul Alam2
1Department of International Health Program in Global Disease Epidemiology and Control Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA
2International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate the specificity of the Crystal VC dipstick test for detecting cholera.MethodsWe compared direct testing using the Crystal VC dipstick test and testing after enrichment for 6 h in alkaline peptone water (APW) to bacterial culture as the gold standard. Samples positive by dipstick but negative by culture were also tested using PCR.ResultsStool was collected from 125 patients. The overall specificities of the direct testing and testing after 6‐h enrichment in APW compared to bacterial culture were 91.8% and 98.4% (P = 0.125), respectively, and the sensitivities were 65.6% and 75.0% (P = 0.07), respectively.ConclusionThe increase in the sensitivity of the Crystal VC kit with the use of the 6‐h enrichment step in APW compared to direct testing was marginally significant. The Crystal VC dipstick had a much higher specificity than previously reported (91–98%). Therefore, this method might be a promising screening tool for cholera outbreak surveillance in resource‐limited settings where elimination of false‐positive results is critical.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1128/JCM.00616-10

10.1371/journal.pntd.0001901

10.1128/JCM.41.8.3939-3941.2003

10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00590.x

10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.03.010

10.1017/S0950268812002932

10.1056/NEJMoa1012928

10.1093/biomet/26.4.404

10.1371/journal.pntd.0000221

10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02335.x

10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01128.x

10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01539.x

10.1016/0140-6736(93)90792-F

Kelvin AA, 2011, Outbreak of Cholera in the Republic of Congo and the Democratic Republic of Congo and the global picture, Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 5, 688, 10.3855/jidc.2246

Lesmana M, 1997, Comparison of direct‐plating and enrichment methods for isolation of Vibrio cholerae from diarrhea patients, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35, 1856, 10.1128/jcm.35.7.1856-1858.1997

10.1371/journal.pone.0036930

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040336

10.1371/journal.pone.0019005

Monsur K, 1963, Bacteriological diagnosis of cholera under field conditions, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 28, 387

Mukherjee P, 2010, Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic dipstick kit for diagnosis of cholera emphasizes its outbreak utility, Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 63, 234, 10.7883/yoken.63.234

10.1128/CDLI.10.3.476-478.2003

10.1371/journal.pone.0037360

Qadri F, 2002, Increased levels of inflammatory mediators in children and adults infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139, Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 9, 221

Rahman M, 2006, Evaluation of Direct Plating and Enrichment Methods for Isolation of Vibrio cholerae O139 from Faecal Samples, Bangladesh Journal of Microbiology, 23, 140, 10.3329/bjm.v23i2.880

10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60356-5

10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15328-7

10.1186/1471-2334-6-17

WHO.Prevention and Control of Cholera Outbreaks: WHO Policy and Recommendations.2013.http://www.who.int/cholera/technical/prevention/control/en/index.html(accessed on 12 September 2013).

10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70138-X