Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure

Aiken, 2006, J., Picton T. W.. Envelope following responses to natural vowels., Audiol Neurootol, 11, 213, 10.1159/000092589

Aiken, 2008, J., Picton T. W.. Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds., Hear Res, 245, 35, 10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.004

Amos, 2007, E., Humes L. E.. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss., J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 819, 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/057)

Billings, 2012, J., Papesh M. A., Penman T. M., et al. Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrimination., Int J Otolaryngol, 2012, 365752, 10.1155/2012/365752

Billings, 2007, J., Tremblay K. L., Souza P. E., et al. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials., Audiol Neurootol, 12, 234, 10.1159/000101331

Billings, 2009, J., Tremblay K. L., Stecker G. C., et al. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level., Hear Res, 254, 15, 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002

Boettcher, 2001, A., Poth E. A., Mills J. H., et al. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects., Hear Res, 153, 32, 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00255-0

Choi, 2013, M., Purcell D. W., Coyne J. A., et al. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences., Ear Hear, 34, 637, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828e4dad

Choi, 2011, M., Purcell D. W., John M. S.. Phase stability of auditory steady state responses in newborn infants., Ear Hear, 32, 593, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318212085e

Grose, 2009, H., Mamo S. K., Hall J. W. III. Age effects in temporal envelope processing: Speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses., Ear Hear, 30, 568, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac128f

Herdman, 2002, T., Lins O., Van Roon P., et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses., Brain Topogr, 15, 69, 10.1023/A:1021470822922

Hornsby, 2003, W., Ricketts T. A.. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding., J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1706, 10.1121/1.1553458

Hornsby, 2006, W., Ricketts T. A.. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss., J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1752, 10.1121/1.2161432

Horwitz, 2008, R., Ahlstrom J. B., Dubno J. R.. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification., J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 798, 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/057)

Jenstad, 2007, M., Bagatto M. P., Seewald R. C., et al. Evaluation of the desired sensation level inputoutput algorithm for adults with hearing loss: The acceptable range for amplified conversational speech., Ear Hear, 28, 793, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157670a

John, 2004, S., Brown D. K., Muir P. J., et al. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants., Ear Hear, 25, 539, 10.1097/01.AUD.0000148050.80749.AC

John, 2003, S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T. W.. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses., Ear Hear, 24, 406, 10.1097/01.AUD.0000090442.37624.BE

John, 1998, S., Lins O. G., Boucher B. L., et al. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters., Audiology, 37, 59, 10.3109/00206099809072962

John, 2002, S., Purcell D. W., Dimitrijevic A., et al. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli., J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246, 10.1055/s-0040-1715968

Korczak, 2005, A., Kurtzberg D., Stapells D. R.. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing., Ear Hear, 26, 165, 10.1097/00003446-200504000-00005

Leigh-Paffenroth, 2006, D., Fowler C. G.. Amplitude-modulated auditory steady-state responses in younger and older listeners., J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 582, 10.3766/jaaa.17.8.5

McNerney, 2012, M., Burkard R. F.. The auditory steady state response: Far-field recordings from the chinchilla., Int J Audiol, 51, 200, 10.3109/14992027.2011.631589

Moore, 2012, C.. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music., Trends Amplif, 16, 159, 10.1177/1084713812465494

Moore, 2011, C., Fullgrabe C., Stone M. A.. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing AIDS and paired comparisons., Ear Hear, 32, 556, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820b5f4c

Moore, 2013, C., Sek A.. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods., Ear Hear, 34, 83, 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182650adf

Picton, 2005, W., Dimitrijevic A., Perez-Abalo M. C., et al. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses., J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 140, 10.3766/jaaa.16.3.3

Picton, 1998, W., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S. C., et al. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses., J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 315

Picton, 2003, W., John M. S., Dimitrijevic A., et al. Human auditory steady-state responses., Int J Audiol, 42, 177, 10.3109/14992020309101316

Polonenko, 2010, J., Scollie S. D., Moodie S., et al. Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a hearing aid prescription for adults., Int J Audiol, 49, 550, 10.3109/14992021003713122

Purcell, 2004, W., John S. M., Schneider B. A., et al. Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses., J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3581, 10.1121/1.1798354

Ricketts, 2008, A., Dittberner A. B., Johnson E. E.. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss., J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 160, 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/012)

Sachs, 1974, B., Abbas P. J.. Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: Tone-burst stimuli., J Acoust Soc Am, 56, 1835, 10.1121/1.1903521

Scollie, 2002, D., Seewald R. C.. Evaluation of electroacoustic test signals I: Comparison with amplified speech., Ear Hear, 23, 477, 10.1097/00003446-200210000-00009

Sherbecoe, 2004, L., Studebaker G. A.. Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units., Int J Audiol, 43, 442, 10.1080/14992020400050056

Stelmachowicz, 1996, G., Kopun J., Mace A. L., et al. Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech., Ear Hear, 17, 520, 10.1097/00003446-199612000-00007

Vickers, 2001, A., Moore B. C., Baer T.. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies., J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1164, 10.1121/1.1381534

Walton, 2002, P., Simon H., Frisina R. D.. Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities., J Neurophysiol, 88, 565, 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.565

Willott, 1988, F., Parham K., Hunter K. P.. Response properties of inferior colliculus neurons in young and very old CBAJ mice., Hear Res, 37, 1, 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90073-1