Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen D., 1996, Policy-Making in the European Union,, 3, 209
Bachtler J., 2001, Quod erat demonstradum?, 3
Bachtler, J., Gross, T. and McMaster, I. Delivering the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas. Background Paper for the UK Presidency Conference ‘Regional and Rural Development Programmes (2007–2013): Delivering the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas’. 7–8 November2005, Newcastle-Gateshead, UK.
Bachtler J., 2003, The Added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective
Bachtler J., 1997, The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds, 346
Bachtler J., 2004, Searching for Consensus: The Debate on Reforming EU Cohesion Policy
Bachtler J., 2005, From Building Blocks to Negotiating Boxes: The Reform of EU Cohesion Policy
Barbier J.-C., 2003, Devising and Using Evaluation Standards, The French Paradox
Beutel J., 1997, Evaluation of the Macroeconomic Impact of the Structural Policies in the Cohesion Countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain) 1989–1999
Beutel J., 2002, The Economic Impact of Objective 1 Interventions for the Period 2000–2006
Blaas E. W., 1991, Evaluation of Alternative Methodological Approaches for Assessing the Regional Macro-Economic Effects of the Community's Regional Action: The PARADISE-Model
Boldrin M., 2001, Economic Policy, 32, 207
Bougas A., 2001, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 6, 311
Bradley J., 2004, A Study of the Macroeconomic Impact of the Reform of EU Cohesion Policy
Casavola, P. and Tagle, L. Building capacity for evaluation: lessons from Italy. 5th European Conference on Evaluation of the Structural Funds, ‘Challenges for Evaluation in an Enlarged Europe’. June. pp.26–27. Budapest Paper presented to the
Court of Auditors. 1998. Special Report No. 15/98 on the assessment of Structural Fund intervention for the 1989–1993 and 1994–1999 periods together with the Commission's replies.Official Journal of the European Communities, C 347/1 16.11.98
2003, Ex Post Evaluation of 1994–1999 Objective 2 Programmes, 1994
2003, Evaluation of the Added Value and Costs of the European Structural Funds in the UK
Ederveen S., 2002, Fertile Soil for the Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy
2002, A Feasibility Study of an Evaluation of the Impact and Added Value of the EU Structural Funds in the UK
2000, Methodologies Used in the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of European Structural Funds: A Comparative Assessment
1997, Ex-Post Evaluation of the 1989–1993 Objective 2 Programmes
2002, An Examination of the Ex-post Macro-economic Impacts of CSF 1994–1999 on Objective 1 Countries and Regions
1990, Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds
1992, Community Structural Policies: Assessment and Outlook
1993, Third Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds
1996, First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion
1999, The MEANS Collection: Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes
2001, Unity, Solidarity, Diversity for Europe, its People and its Territory, Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion
2002, Community Added Value: Definition and Evaluation Criteria
2004, A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion
European Council. 1988. Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments.Official Journal of the European Communities, L185 15.7.88
European Council. 1993. Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2081/93 of 20 July 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments.Official Journal of the European Communities, L193 21.7.93
European Council. 1999. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1260/1999 of 12 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds.Official Journal of the European Communities, L161 26.6.99
2005, Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council, 15–16 December 2005
Fontaine C., 2002, International Atlas of Evaluation, 63
Furubo J.-E., 2002, International Atlas of Evaluation
2003, A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom
Hummelbrunner R., 2005, Process Monitoring of Impacts: Towards a New Approach to Monitor the Implementation of Structural Funds Programmes
2004, Final Report by the Commission for the Study and Creation of a State Agency for the Evaluation of the Quality of Public Services and Policies
Marks G., 1992, Europolitics, Institutions and Policymaking in the new European Community, 191
1993, Methods to Give Meaning to the Evaluation Obligation: The Conclusions of the MEANS Programme
Michie R., 1997, The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds, 14
Osuna J. L., 2000, Guía para la evaluación de políticas públicas
2004, Effektutvärdering av de geografiske målprogrammen inom EG:s strukturfonder
Röger, W. Macroeconomic evaluation of the effects of CSF with Quest II. European Conference on Evaluation Methods for Structural Funds Intervention. 2–3 December1996, Berlin, Germany. Paper presented at the
Scheffel K., 2001, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 6, 315
Tarschys D., 2003, Reinventing Cohesion: The Future of European Structural Policy
2003, The Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development: The Guide
Taylor S., 2001, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 6, 341
Wadley D., 1986, Restructuring the Regions: Analysis, Policy Model and Prognosis