Evaluation of Atmospheric Transport Models for Use in Phase II of the Historical Public Exposures Studies at the Rocky Flats Plant

Risk Analysis - 1999
Arthur S. Rood1, George G. Killough2, John E. Till3
1K-Spar Inc., Rigby
2Hendecagon Corporation, Oak Ridge
3Radiological Assessments Corporation, Neeses

Tóm tắt

Five atmospheric transport models were evaluated for use in Phase II of the Historical Public Exposures Studies at the Rocky Flats Plant. Models included a simple straight-line Gaussian plume model (ISCST2), several integrated puff models (RATCHET, TRIAD, and INPUFF2), and a complex terrain model (TRAC). Evaluations were based on how well model predictions compared with sulfur hexafluoride tracer measurements taken in the vicinity of Rocky Flats in February 1991. Twelve separate tracer experiments were conducted, each lasting 9 hr and measured at 140 samplers in arcs 8 and 16 km from the release point at Rocky Flats. Four modeling objectives were defined based on the endpoints of the overall study: (1) the unpaired maximum hourly average concentration, (2) paired time-averaged concentration, (3) unpaired time-averaged concentration, and (4) arc-integrated concentration. Performance measures were used to evaluate models and focused on the geometric mean and standard deviation of the predicted-to-observed ratio and the correlation coefficient between predicted and observed concentrations. No one model consistently outperformed the others in all modeling objectives and performance measures. About 75% of the maximum hourly concentration predictions were within a factor of 5 of the observations. About 64% of the paired and 80% of the unpaired time-averaged model predictions were within a factor of 5 of the observations. The overall performance of the RATCHET model was somewhat better than the other models. All models appeared to experience difficulty defining plume trajectories, which was attributed to the influence of multilayered flow initiated by terrain complexities and the diurnal flow patterns characteristic of the Colorado Front Range.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Health Advisory Panel, Health Advisory Panel's Report to Colorado Citizens on the Phase I Study of the State of Colorado's Health Studies on Rocky Flats(Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, 1993).

S. R. Ripple, T. E. Widner, and T. R. Mongan, ''Past Radionuclide Releases from Routine Operations at Rocky Flats,'' Health Phys.502–509 (1996).

K. J. Brown, Rocky Flats 1990–91 Winter Validation Tracer Study,Report AG91–19 (North American Weather Consultants, Salt Lake City, UT, 1991).

C. R. Hodgin, Terrain-Responsive Atmospheric Code (TRAC) Transport and Diffusion: Features and Software Overview,Report RFP-4516 (EG & G Rocky Flats, Golden, CO, 1991).

D. A. Haugen and I. P. Fotino, Performance Evaluation of the Terrain-Responsive Atmospheric Code (TRAC) Model(Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 1993).

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISCST2) Dispersion Models Vol.1, User's Instructions,EPA-450/4–92–008a (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992).

D. G. Fox, ''Uncertainty in Air Quality Modeling,'' Bull.Am.Meteorol.Soc. 27–36 (1984).

J. V. Ramsdell, Jr., C. A. Simonen, and K. W. Burk, Regional Atmospheric Transport Code for Hanford Emission Tracking (RATCHET),PNWD-2224 HEDR UC-000 (Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Hanford, WA, 1994).

B. B. Hicks, K. S. Rao, R. J. Dobosy, R. P. Hosker, J. A. Herwehe, and W. R. Pendergrass, TRIAD: A Puff-Trajectory Model for Reactive Gas Dispersion with Application to UF6 Releases to the Atmosphere,ERL ARL-168 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Springs, MD, 1989).

W. B. Petersen and L. Lavdas, INPUFF 2.0: AMultiple Source Gaussian Puff Dispersion Algorithm,EPA-600/8–86/024 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1986).

F. Pasquill, ''The Estimation of the Dispersion of Windborne Material,'' MeteOrol.Mag.33–49 (1961).

F. A. Gifford, ''Use of Routine Meteorological Observations for Estimating Atmospheric Dispersion,'' Nucl.Safety,(4), 47–51 (1961).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, On-Site Meteorological Program Guidancefor Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA-450/4–87–013 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1987).

J. V. Ramsdell, Jr., and K. W. Burk, MESOIL2, a Lagrangian Trajectory Climatological Dispersion Model,PNL-7430 HEDR (Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Hanford, WA, 1991).

D. B. Turner, Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates,Office of Air Programs Publication No. AP-26 (NTIS PB 191 482) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1970).

J. S. Irwin, ''Estimating Plume Dispersion-A Comparison of Several Sigma Schemes,'' J.Climate Appl.Meteor.92–114 (1983).

S. S. Zilitinkevich, ''On the Determination of the Height of the Ekman Boundary Layer,'' Boundary Layer Meteorol.(2), 141–145 (1972).

U.S. Department of Energy, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Rocky Flats Plant,DOE/EIS-0064 (April 1980).

D. B. Turner, ''A Diffusion Model for an Urban Area,'' J.Appl.Meteorol.(1), 83–91 (1964).

J. M. Weber, A. S. Rood, J. Binder, H. R. Meyer, and J. E. Till, Development of the Rocky Flats Plant 903 Area Plutonium Source Term,3 CDPHE-RFP-1997-DRAFT (Radiological Assessments Corporation, Neeses, SC, September 1997).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Procedures for Determining the Best Performing Model(EPA Office of AirQuality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1988).

K. S. Rao and R. P. Hosker, ''Uncertainty in the Assessment of Atmospheric Concentrations of Toxic Contaminants from an Accidental Release,'' Radiation Protection Dosimetry281–288 (1993).

R. S. Tangirala, K. S. Rao, and R. P. Hosker, ''A Puff Model Simulation of Tracer Concentrations in the Nocturnal Drainage Flow in a Deep Valley,'' Atmos.Environ.299–309 (1992).

S. R. Hanna, J. C. Chang, and D. G. Strimaitis, ''Hazardous Gas Model Evaluation with Field Observations,'' Atmos.Environ.2265–2285 (1993).

A. S. Rood, Evaluation of Atmospheric Models, Task 3: Independent Analysis of Exposure, Dose and Health Risk to Offsite Individuals, 03-CDPHE-RFP-1996 (Radiological Assessments Corporation,Neeses, SC, December 1997).

S. R. Hanna, ''Air Quality Model Evaluation and Uncertainty,'' J.Air Pollut Cont.Assoc.599–602 (1981).

S. R. Hanna, D. G. Strimaitis, and J. C. Chang, Hazard Response Modeling Uncertainty (A Quantitative Method), Volume 1: User's Guide for Software for Evaluating Hazardous Gas Dispersion Models(Air Force Engineering and Service Center, Tyndall Air Force Base, FL, 1991).

R. Lange, ''Modeling the Dispersion of Tracer Plumes in the Colorado Front Range Boundary Layer During Night-and Day-Time Conditions,'' Presented at the American Meteorological Society Tenth Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, Portland, Oregon, September 29-October 2, 1992.

C. E. Elderkin and P. H. Gudiksen, ''Transport and Dispersion in Complex Terrain,'' Radiation Protection Dosimetry265–271 (1993).

C. W. Miller and L. M. Hively, ''A Review of Validation Studies for the Gaussian Plume Atmospheric Dispersion Model,'' Nucl.Safety(4), 522–531 (1987).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Risk Analysis

Thông tin tác giả