Evaluating wavelet compression in microcalcification detection in mammography

O. Kocsis1, L. Costaridou1, L. Varaki2, E. Likaki2, C. Kalogeropoulou2, G. Panayiotakis1
1Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
2Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

Tóm tắt

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a wavelet-based image compression algorithm in mammography. As microcalcifications detection is selected as diagnostic task, the algorithm is evaluated with respect to its visually lossless threshold at low compression ratios and not its supra-threshold performance. The threshold is determined by means of observer performance using a set of digitized mammograms from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography and by means of an image quality study, related to transfer characteristics of the compression algorithm, using computer-generated test images. The image quality parameters used are input/output response, noise, high contrast response and low contrast-detail response. The computer-generated test images mimic mammographic image and microcalcification characteristics. Receiver operating characteristics analysis of pooled data for microcalcification detection in mammograms indicated a threshold at compression ratio 40:1. Image quality parameters assessment, with respect to low contrast-detail patterns, indicated a threshold at compression ratio 35:1. The two approaches provided comparable thresholds, indicating the potential use of image quality parameters.

Từ khóa

#Mammography #Image coding #Image quality #Biomedical imaging #Compression algorithms #Testing #Medical diagnostic imaging #Degradation #Diseases #Tiles

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/146392399298311 0 10.1080/146392399298528 10.1080/146392300750019172 10.1097/00004424-199301000-00017 10.1259/bjr.71.851.10434911 10.1259/bjr.74.886.740913 1998, Standard for Teleradiology 10.1109/30.920468 10.1118/1.598830 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap47543 1996, European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, EUR 16260 EN Luxembourg CEC bean, 2000, Image compress ion and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncornpressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10: 1 JPEG compression, J Dig Imaging, 13, 33, 10.1007/BF03167620 10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00135-X okkalides, 0, Quality assessment of DSA, ultrasound and CT digital images compressed with the J P EO protocol, Phys Med Biol, 39, 1407, 10.1088/0031-9155/39/9/008 10.1259/bjr.74.885.740841