Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis

The Behavior Analyst - Tập 33 Số 1 - Trang 97-117 - 2010
Simon Dymond1, Richard J. May1, Anita Munnelly1, Alice E. Hoon1
1Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom, SA2 8PP, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alos, F. J., & Lora, M. D. (2007). Contextual control in teaching numbers to a child with intellectual disabilities. Psicothema, 19, 435–439.

Augustson, E. M., Dougher, M. J., & Markham, M. R. (2000). Emergence of conditional stimulus relations and transfer of respondent eliciting functions among compound stimuli. The Psychological Record, 50, 745–770.

Austin, J., & Wilson, K. G. (2001). Response-response relationships in organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 39–53.

Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

Barnes, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–267.

Barnes, D., & Keenan, M. (1993). Concurrent activities and instructed human fixed-interval performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 501–520.

Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders’ commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–507.

Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997a). A behavior-analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543–572.

Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997b). Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of human sexuality. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 6, 117–135.

Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251–265.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Smeets, P. M., Cullinan, V., & Leader, G. (2004). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 181–214.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Cochrane, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & McHugh, L. (2004). Psychological acceptance: Experimental analyses and theoretical interpretations. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 517–530.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Grey, I. (1999). Language and cognition. The Psychologist, 12, 500–504.

Barnes-Holmes, D., & Hayes, S. C. (2003). A reply to Galizio’s “The abstracted operant: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition.” The Behavior Analyst, 26, 305–310.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Luciano, C. M., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2004). Introductory comments to the series on relational frame theory. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 177–179.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Regan, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Stewart, I., et al. (2005). Relating derived relations as a model of analogical reasoning: Reaction times and event-related potentials. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 435–451.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Whelan, R., Stewart, I., Commins, S., et al. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 215–240.

Barnes-Holmes, D., Valverde, M. R., & Whelan, R. (2005). Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of language and cognition. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 255–275.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Cullinan, V. (2001). Education. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skin-nerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 181–195). New York: Plenum.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McHugh, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2004). Relational frame theory: Some implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 355–375.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Murphy, C. (2004). Teaching the generic skills of language and cognition: Contributions from relational frame theory. In D. J. Moran & R. W. Malott (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 277–292). London: Elsevier Science/Academic Press.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001a). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287–308.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001b). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry: II. The Psychological Record, 51, 589–603.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 531–558.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 28, 101–138.

Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 40, 45–71.

Blackledge, J. T. (2007). Disrupting verbal processes: Cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy and other mind-fulness-based psychotherapies. The Psychological Record, 57, 555–576.

Boelens, H. (1996). Accounting for stimulus equivalence: Reply to Hayes and Wilson. The Psychological Record, 46, 237–242.

Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 25–54.

Burgos, J. E. (2003). Laudable goals, interesting experiments, unintelligible theorizing: A critical review of Relational Frame Theory. Behavior & Philosophy, 31, 19–45.

Burgos, J. E. (2004). Is relational frame theory intelligible? Acta Comportamentalia, 12, 53–73.

Burgos, J. E., & Donahoe, J. W. (2000). Structure and function in selectionism: Implications for complex behavior. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 39–57). Reno, NV: Context Press.

Carr, J. E., & Britton, L. N. (2003). Citation trends of applied journals in behavioral psychology: 1981–2000. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 36, 113–117.

Ciarrochi, J., & Robb, H. (2005). Letting a little nonverbal air into the room: Insights from acceptance and commitment therapy: Part 2. Applications. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 107–130.

Ciarrochi, J., Robb, H., & Godsell, C. (2005). Letting a little nonverbal air into the room: Insights from acceptance and commitment therapy: Part 1. Philosophical and theoretical underpinnings. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 79–106.

Clayton, M. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 49, 145–161.

Coyne, L. W., & Wilson, K. G. (2004). The role of cognitive fusion in impaired parenting: An RFT analysis. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 469–486.

Critchfield, T. S. (2002). Evaluating the function of applied behavior analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 35, 423–426.

Cullinan, V. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence II. The Psychological Record, 50, 467–492.

Cullinan, V. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2001). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339–349.

De Mey, H. R. A. (2003). Two psychologies: Cognitive versus contingency-oriented. Theory & Psychology, 13, 695–709.

Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

Dixon, M. R., Dymond, S., Rehfeldt, R. A., Roche, B., & Zlomke, K. R. (2003). Terrorism and relational frame theory. Behavior and Social Issue, 12, 129–147.

Dixon, M. R., Small, S. L., & Rosales, R. (2007). Extended analysis of empirical citations with Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 30, 197–209.

Dixon, M. R., & Zlomke, K. M. (2005). Using the precursor to the relational evaluation procedure (pREP) to establish the relational frames of sameness, opposition, and distinction. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 305–316.

Dougher, M. J. (2002). This is not B. F. Skinner’s behavior analysis: A review of Hayes, Strosahl, and Wilson’s Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 35, 323–336.

Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179–197.

Dougher, M., Perkins, D. R., Greenway, D., Koons, A., & Chiasson, C. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 63–93.

Dymond, S. (2002). The next generation: Authorship trends in the experimental analysis of human behavior (1980–1999). Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 1–8.

Dymond, S. (2005). Learning across the life span: A review of Child and Adolescent Development: A Behavioral Systems Approach. Infant and Child Development, 14, 430–432.

Dymond, S., & Alonso-Alvarez, B. (in press). The selective impact of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior on empirical research: A reply to Schlinger (2008). The Psychological Record.

Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.

Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1998). The effects of prior equivalence testing and detailed verbal instructions on derived self-discrimination transfer: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 48, 147–170.

Dymond, S., & Critchfield, T. S. (2001). Neither dark age nor renaissance: Research and authorships trends in the experimental analysis of human behavior (1980–1999). The Behavior Analyst, 24, 241–253.

Dymond, S., O’Hora, D., Whelan, R., & O’Donovan, A. (2006). Citation analysis of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 75–88.

Dymond, S., & Rehfeldt, R. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239–254.

Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). The continuity strategy, human behavior, and behavior analysis. The Psychological Record, 53, 333–347.

Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2007). Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 249–262.

Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2008). Derived avoidance learning: Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames. The Psychological Record, 58, 271–288.

Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2005). Relational frame theory and the transformation of stimulus function. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 291–303.

Ellis, A. (2005). Can rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) resolve their differences and be integrated? Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 153–168.

Fletcher, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2005). Relational frame theory, acceptance and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 315–336.

Fox, E. J. (2006). Clarifying functional con-textualism: A reply to commentaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 61–64.

Frank, A. J. (2004). Review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition, 12, 169–177.

Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 31, 137–156.

Galizio, M. (2003). The abstracted operant: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 159–169.

Galizio, M. (2004). Relational frames: Where do they come from? A comment on Barnes-Holmes and Hayes (2003). The Behavior Analyst, 27, 107–112.

Garcia, Y. A. (2003). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 35, 99–100.

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479.

Gavin, A., Roche, B., & Ruiz, M. R. (2008). Competing contingencies over derived relational responding: A behavioral model of the implicit association test. The Psychological Record, 58, 427–441.

Giurfa, M., Zhang, S., Jenett, A., Menzel, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2001). The concepts of “sameness” and “difference” in an insect. Nature, 410, 930–933.

Gomez, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Luciano, M. C. (2001). Generalized break equivalence I. The Psychological Record, 51, 131–150.

Gomez, S., Lopez, F., Martin, C. B., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2007). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of functions in accordance with symmetry and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 57, 273–293.

Gomez-Martin, S., Lopez-Rios, F., & Mesa-Manjon, H. (2007). Relational frame theory: Some implications for psychopathology and psychotherapy. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 491–507.

Gross, A., & Fox, E. J. (2009). Relational frame theory: An overview of the controversy. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 87–98.

Haas, J. R., & Hayes, S. C. (2006). When knowing you are doing well hinders performance: Exploring the interaction between rules and feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 91–111.

Hayes, S. C. (1996). Developing a theory of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 309–311.

Hayes, S. C. (2004a). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665.

Hayes, S. C. (2004b). Fleeing from the elephant: Language, cognition and post-Skinnerian behavior analytic science. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 24, 155–173.

Hayes, S. C. (2005). Stability and change in cognitive behavior therapy: Considering the implications of ACT and RFT. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 131–151.

Hayes, S. C. (2007). Mindfulness from the bottom up: Providing an inductive framework for understanding mindfulness processes and their application to human suffering. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 242–248.

Hayes, S. C. (2008). Climbing our hills: A beginning conversation on the comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and traditional cognitive behavioral therapy. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice, 15, 286–295.

Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–244.

Hayes, S. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational operants: Processes and implications: A response to Palmer’s review of relational frame theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 213–224.

Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2003). Behavior analysis, relational frame theory, and the challenge of human language and cognition: A reply to the commentaries on Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 39–54.

Hayes, S. C., & Berens, N. M. (2004). Why relational frame theory alters the relationship between basic and applied behavioral psychology. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 341–353.

Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., Herbst, S., Bond, F. W., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Expanding the scope of organizational behavior management: Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of complex human behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 1–23.

Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., Wilson, K. G., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of language and cognition (pp. 21–49). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Hayes, G. J. (1998). Moral behavior and the development of verbal regulation. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 253–279.

Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.

Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

Hayes, S. C., & Leonhard, C. (1994). An alternative behavior-analytic approach to verbal behavior. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia, 11, 69–86.

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44, 1–25.

Hayes, S. C., & Quinones, R. M. (2005). Characterizing relational operants. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37(2), 277–289.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change New York: Guilford.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283–301.

Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1995). The role of cognition in complex human behavior: A contextualistic perspective. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 241–248.

Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1996). Criticisms of relational frame theory: Implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 221–236.

Healy, O., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1998). Derived relational responding as an operant: The effects of between-session feedback. The Psychological Record, 48, 511–536.

Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207–227.

Hernandez, A., & Garcia, Y. A. (2005). Preliminary considerations to the study of relational frames. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 243–254.

Higuera, J. A. G. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) as a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) development. Revista de Psicologia y Psicopedagogia, 5, 287–304.

Hineline, P. N. (1997). How, then, shall we characterize this elephant? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 297–300.

Holden, B. (2007). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A behavior analytic psychotherapy. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 44, 1118–1126.

Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.

Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1997). Toward a theory of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 271–296.

Ingvarsson, E. T., & Morris, E. K. (2004). Post-Skinnerian, post-Skinner, or neo-Skin-nerian? Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, and Roche’s Relational Frame Theory. The Psychological Record, 54, 497–504.

Jesus, M., Garcia, M., Gomez-Becerra, I., Chavez-Brown, M., & Greer, D. (2006). Perspective taking and theory of the mind: Conceptual and empirical issues. A complementary and pragmatic proposal. Salud Mental, 29, 11–18.

Kanter, J. W., Baruch, D. E., & Gaynor, S. T. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy and behavioral activation for the treatment of depression: Description and comparison. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 161–185.

Kanter, J. W., Busch, A. M., Weeks, C. E., & Landes, S. J. (2008). The nature of clinical depression: Symptoms, syndromes, and behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 1–21.

Kanter, J. W., Parker, C. R., & Kohlenberg, R. J. (2001). Finding the self: A behavioral measure and its clinical implications. Psychotherapy, 38, 198–211.

Leigland, S. (1997). Is a new definition of verbal behavior necessary in light of derived relational responding? The Behavior Analyst, 20, 3–9.

Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1327–1336.

Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Applying acceptance, mindfulness, and values to the reduction of prejudice: A pilot study. Behavior Modification, 31, 389–411.

Lopez, C. A., Munoz, A., & Ballesteros, B. P. (2005). Changing socio-verbal context in women at risk of developing alimentary problems: A relational frame approach. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 359–378.

Lopez, F., & Javier, C. (2003). Private events: A conceptual reconstruction. Apuntes de Psicologia, 21, 157–176.

Lowe, C. F., & Horne, P. J. (1996). Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 315–353.

Luciano, M. C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349–365.

Luciano, M. C., Herruzo, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Generalization of say-do correspondence. The Psychological Record, 51, 111–130.

Malone, J. C. (2003). Advances in behaviorism: It’s not what it used to be. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 85–89.

Malott, R. W. (2003). Behavior analysis and linguistic productivity. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 11–18.

Marcon-Dawson, A., Vicars, S. M., & Miguel, C. F. (2009). Publication trends in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior: 1999–2008. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 123–132.

Marr, M. J. (2003). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Contemporary Psychology APA Review of Book, 48, 526–529.

Martinez, O. G., & Soriano, C. L. (2006). A study of pain in the perspective of verbal behavior: From the contributions of W. E. Fordyce to relational frame theory (RFT). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 169–188.

McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004a). Perspective-taking as relational responding: A developmental profile. The Psychological Record, 54, 115–144.

McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004b). Relational frame account of the development of complex cognitive phenomena: Perspective-taking, false belief understanding, and deception. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 303–324.

McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2006). Understanding false belief as generalized operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 56, 341–364.

McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I., & Dymond, S. (2007). Deictic relational complexity and the development of deception. The Psychological Record, 57, 517–531.

McIlvane, W. J. (2003). A stimulus in need of a response: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 29–37.

Merwin, R. M., & Wilson, K. G. (2005). Preliminary findings on the effects of self-referring and evaluative stimuli on stimulus equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 55, 561–575.

Michael, J., & Malott, R. W. (2003). Michael and Malott’s dialogue on linguistic productivity. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 115–118.

Minster, S. T., Jones, M., Elliffe, D., & Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. (2006). Stimulus equivalence: Testing Sidman’s (2000) theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 371–391.

Moore, J. (2000). Thinking about thinking and feeling about feeling. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 45–56.

Mosticoni, R. (2007). Identity: The functions of self. Acta Comportamentalia, 15, 71–82.

Murphy, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2005). Derived manding in children with autism: Synthesizing Skinner’s Verbal Behavior with relational frame theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 38, 445–462.

Myles, S. M. (2004). Understanding and treating loss of sense of self following brain injury: A behavior analytic approach. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 487–504.

Neziroglu, F., Khemlani-Patel, S., & Veale, D. (2008). Social learning theory and cognitive behavioral models of body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image, 5, 28–38.

Ninness, C., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Harrison, C., Ford, A. M., & Ninness, S. K. (2005). A functional analytic approach to computer-interactive mathematics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 38, 1–22.

Northup, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Serrett, K. (1993). Publication trends in 25 years of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysi, 26, 527–537.

O’Hora, D., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Instructional control: Developing a relational frame analysis. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 263–284.

O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.

O’Hora, D., & Maglieri, K. A. (2006). Goal statements and goal-directed behavior: A relational frame account of goal setting in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 25, 131–170.

O’Hora, D., Pelaez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K., & Chaudhary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: Correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS-II. The Psychological Record, 58, 569–583.

O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51–75.

Osborne, J. G. (2003). Beyond Skinner? A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 19–27.

O’Toole, C., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Teaching flexible, intelligent, and creative behavior. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 353–372. Oakland, CA: Context Press/ New Harbinger.

Paez-Blarrina, M., Luciano, M. C., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Valdivia, S., Rodríguez-Val-verde, M., & Ortega, J. (2008). Coping with pain in the motivational context of values: Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive control-based protocol. Behavior Modification, 32, 403–422.

Palmer, D. C. (2004a). Data in search of a principle: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189–204.

Palmer, D. C. (2004b). Generic response classes and relational frame theory: Response to Hayes and Barnes-Holmes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 225–234.

Paul, H. A. (2004). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition [Review]. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 11, 337–339.

Pelaez, M., & Moreno, R. (1998). A taxonomy of rules and their correspondence to rule-governed behavior. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta, 24, 197–214.

Pena-Correall, T. E. (2007). B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: 1957–2007. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 39, 653–661.

Perez-Gonzalez, L. A., & Alonso-Alvarez, B. (2008). Common control by compound samples in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 81–101.

Perez-Gonzalez, L. A., & Martinez, H. (2007). Control by contextual stimuli in novel second-order conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 57, 117–143.

Perez-Gonzalez, L. A., & Serna, R. W. (2003). Transfer of specific contextual functions to novel conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 395–408.

Petursdottir, A. I., Peterson, S. P., & Peters, A. C. (2009). A quarter century of The Analysis of Verbal Behavior: An analysis of impact. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 109–121.

Piazza, C. (2009, May). JABA and the impact factor. Presentation at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Phoenix.

Rehfeldt, R., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective taking in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. The Psychological Record, 57, 23–47.

Reilly, T., Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2005). The effect of training structure on the latency of responses to a five-term linear chain. The Psychological Record, 55, 233–249.

Robb, H., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). Some final, gulp, “words” on REBT, ACT & RFT. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 23, 169–173.

Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451–475.

Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–301.

Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1998). The experimental analysis of human sexual arousal: Some recent developments. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 37–52.

Roche, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Behavior analysis and social constructionism: Some points of contact and departure. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 215–231.

Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267–291.

Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I., & O’Hora, D. (2002). Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 75–91.

Roche, B., & Dymond, S. (2008). A transformation of functions in accordance with the nonarbitrary relational properties of sexual stimuli. The Psychological Record, 58, 71–94.

Roche, B. T., Kanter, J. W., Brown, K. R., Dymond, S., & Fogarty, C. C. (2008). A comparison of “direct” versus “derived” extinction of avoidance responding. The Psychological Record, 58, 443–464.

Routier, C. P. (2007). Relational frame theory (RFT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): Emperor’s tailors or knights of the Holy Grail? Acta Comportamentalia, 15, 45–69.

Salzinger, K. (2003). On the verbal behavior of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 7–9.

Saunders, R. R. (1996). From review to commentary on Roche and Barnes: Toward a better understanding of equivalence in the context of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 46, 477–487.

Sautter, R. A., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2006). The empirical applications of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior with humans. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 35–48.

Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., Petursdottir, A. I., Esch, B. E., & Gillet, J. N. (2004). Scholarly productivity in behavior analysis: The most prolific authors and institutions from 1992 to 2001. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 235–243.

Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.

Sidman, M. (2008). Symmetry and equivalence relations in behavior. Cognitive Studie, 15, 322–332.

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. London: Penguin.

Soriano, C. L., Martinez, O. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2005). Analyzing the verbal contexts in experiential avoidance disorder and in acceptance and commitment therapy. Re-vista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 37, 333–358.

Spradlin, J. E. (2003). Alternative theories of the origin of derived stimulus relations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 3–6.

Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

Stemmer, N. (1995). Do we need an alternative theory of verbal behavior?: A reply to Hayes and Wilson. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 357–362.

Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 191–199.

Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational frame theory and analogical reasoning: Empirical investigations. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 241–262.

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Bond, F. W., & Hayes, S. C. (2006). Relational frame theory and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 55–90.

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2004). A functional-analytic model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. The Psychological Record, 54, 531–552.

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381–408.

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002a). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396.

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002b). Stimulus equivalence and nonarbitrary relations. The Psychological Record, 52, 77–88.

Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2009). Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 309–318.

Strand, P. S., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Educating the whole child: Implications of behaviorism as a science of meaning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 105–117.

Tonneau, F. (2002). Who can understand relational frame theory? A reply to Barnes-Holmes and Hayes. European Journal of Behavior Analysi, 3, 95–102.

Tonneau, F. (2004). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition [Review]. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 265–268.

Tonneau, F., Arreola, F., & Martinez, A. G. (2006). Function transformation without reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 393–405.

Törneke, N., Luciano, C. M., & Salas, S. V. (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 8, 141–156.

Viladarga, R., Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., & Muto, T. (2009). Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 105–133.

Vitale, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Campbell, C. (2008). Facilitating responding in accordance with the relational frame of comparison: Systematic empirical analyses. The Psychological Record, 58, 365–390.

Weinstein, J. H., Wilson, K. G., Drake, C. E., & Kellum, K. K. (2008). A relational frame theory contribution to social categorization. Behavior and Social Issue, 17, 40–65.

Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004a). Empirical models of formative augmenting in accordance with the relations of same, opposite, more-than and less-than. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 285–302.

Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004b). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195.

Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dymond, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 317–335.

White, E., & Dougher, M. (2004). Criticizing the tendency for evolutionary psychologists to adopt cognitive paradigms when discussing language. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 325–340.

Wilson, K. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2000). Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 25–43.

Wilson, K. G., O’Donohue, W. T., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Hume’s psychology, contemporary learning theory, and the problem of knowledge amplification. New Ideas in Psychology, 19, 1–25.

Winn, W. (2006). Functional contextualism in context: A reply to Fox. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 55–59.