Evaluating the application of K-mean clustering in Earthquake vulnerability mapping of Istanbul, Turkey

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction - Tập 79 - Trang 103154 - 2022
Mahyat Shafapourtehrany1, Peyman Yariyan2, Haluk Özener1, Biswajeet Pradhan3,4,5, Farzin Shabani6,7,8
1Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Department of Geodesy, Bogazici University, 34680, Cengelkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Surveying Engineering, Saghez Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saghez, Iran
3Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
4Center of Excellence for Climate Change Research, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80234, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
5Earth Observation Centre, Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
6Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
7ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, Global Ecology, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
8Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O.Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar

Tài liệu tham khảo

Grasso, 2011, vol. 1 Dalezios, 2017 Ward, 2020, Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1069, 10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020 Spiridonov, 2021, 303 Silva, 2015, Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13, 429, 10.1007/s10518-014-9630-0 Preciado, 2015 Bolin, 2006 Chaulagain, 2015, Seismic risk assessment and hazard mapping in Nepal, Nat. Hazards, 78, 583, 10.1007/s11069-015-1734-6 Huang, 2014, Post-earthquake landsliding and long-term impacts in the wenchuan earthquake area, China, Eng. Geol., 182, 111, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.008 Fan, 2019, Earthquake‐induced chains of geologic hazards: patterns, mechanisms, and impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 421, 10.1029/2018RG000626 Parisi, 2013, Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks, Eng. Fail. Anal., 34, 735, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.005 Freddi, 2021, Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: recent advances and challenges, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 60, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102267 Shapira, 2018, Anticipated behavioral response patterns to an earthquake: the role of personal and household characteristics, risk perception, previous experience and preparedness, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.001 De Lange, 2010, Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment—a review and perspectives, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 3871, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009 Mcentire, 2012, Understanding and reducing vulnerability: from the approach of liabilities and capabilities, Disaster Prev. Manag. Int. J., 20, 294, 10.1108/09653561111141736 Hagenlocher, 2018, Vulnerability and risk of deltaic social-ecological systems exposed to multiple hazards, Sci. Total Environ., 631, 71, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.013 Gaillard, 2010, Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: perspectives for climate and development policy, J. Int. Dev.: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 22, 218, 10.1002/jid.1675 Cardona, 2012, 65 Silva, 2019, Current challenges and future trends in analytical fragility and vulnerability modeling, Earthq. Spectra, 35, 1927, 10.1193/042418EQS101O Rashed, 2003, Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 17, 547, 10.1080/1365881031000114071 Peduzzi, 2009, Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the disaster risk index, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 1149, 10.5194/nhess-9-1149-2009 Merciu, 2018, Mapping accessibility for earthquake hazard response in the historic urban centre of bucharest, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2011, 10.5194/nhess-18-2011-2018 Mcclure, 2015, When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the christchurch earthquakes, Nat. Hazards, 75, 635, 10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6 De Silva, 2018, Assessment method for seismic vulnerability of old masonry buildings in Sri Lanka, Procedia Eng., 212, 61, 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.009 Zhuang, 2019, Scenario-based risk assessment of earthquake disaster using slope displacement, pga, and population density in the guyuan region, China, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8, 85, 10.3390/ijgi8020085 Cacace, 2018, Building inventory at national scale by evaluation of seismic vulnerability classes distribution based on census data analysis: Binc procedure, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 28, 384, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.016 Han, 2021, Improvement of earthquake risk awareness and seismic literacy of Korean citizens through earthquake vulnerability map from the 2017 pohang earthquake, South Korea, Rem. Sens., 13, 1365, 10.3390/rs13071365 French, 2006, Advanced technologies for earthquake risk inventories, J. Earthq. Eng., 10, 207, 10.1080/13632460609350594 Nalbant, 2002, Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in eastern Turkey, Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 195, 291, 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00592-1 Sezen, 2006, Seismic performance of industrial facilities affected by the 1999 Turkey earthquake, J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20, 28, 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:1(28) Oral, 2015 Yariyan, 2021, Gis-based seismic vulnerability mapping: a comparison of artificial neural networks hybrid models, Geocarto Int., 1 Han, 2019, Performance of logistic regression and support vector machines for seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping: a case study of the 12 september 2016 ml5. 8 gyeongju earthquake, South Korea, Sustainability, 11, 7038, 10.3390/su11247038 Wu, 2004, Risk assessment of earth fractures by constructing an intrinsic vulnerability map, a specific vulnerability map, and a hazard map, using yuci city, shanxi, China as an example, Environ. Geol., 46, 104 Nyimbili, 2018, Integration of gis, ahp and topsis for earthquake hazard analysis, Nat. Hazards, 92, 1523, 10.1007/s11069-018-3262-7 Rezaei, 2018, Urban vulnerability assessment using ahp, Adv. Civ. Eng., 2018, 1, 10.1155/2018/2018601 Fazel, 2017, Zonation of urban seismic vulnerability using anp model (case study: Najaf abad city), J. Emergency Manag., 6, 121 Morales, 2021, Establishment of natural hazards mapping criteria using analytic hierarchy process (ahp), Front. Sustain., 2, 10.3389/frsus.2021.667105 Banica, 2017, Towards urban resilience: a multi-criteria analysis of seismic vulnerability in iasi city (Romania), Sustainability, 9, 270, 10.3390/su9020270 Nazmfar, 2019, Vulnerability evaluation of urban buildings to various earthquake intensities: a case study of the municipal zone 9 of tehran, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 25, 455, 10.1080/10807039.2018.1556086 Shawon, 2021 Shokri, 2019, A review on the artificial neural network approach to analysis and prediction of seismic damage in infrastructure, Int. J. Hydromechatronics, 2, 178, 10.1504/IJHM.2019.104386 Han, J., Park, S., Kim, S., Son, S., Lee, S. & Kim, J., Year. Seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping using frequency ratio and logistic regression: a case study of gyeongju, south koreaed.^eds. Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XInternational Society for Optics and Photonics, 111561B. Panagiota, 2012, A support vector regression approach for building seismic vulnerability assessment and evaluation from remote sensing and in-situ dataed, 7533 Riedel, 2015, Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban environments in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions using association rule learning and support vector machine methods, Nat. Hazards, 76, 1111, 10.1007/s11069-014-1538-0 Asadi, 2019, Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings and traffic networks using fuzzy ordered weighted average, J. Mt. Sci., 16, 10.1007/s11629-017-4802-4 Han, 2020, Seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping of gyeongju, South Korea using frequency ratio, decision tree, and random forest, Sustainability, 12, 7787, 10.3390/su12187787 Nachappa, 2020, Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using dempster shafer theory, J. Hydrol., 590 Kavzoglu, 2019, Machine learning techniques in landslide susceptibility mapping: a survey and a case study, Landslides Theor. Pract. Model., 283, 10.1007/978-3-319-77377-3_13 Oh, 2019, Land subsidence susceptibility mapping using bayesian, functional, and meta-ensemble machine learning models, Appl. Sci., 9, 1248, 10.3390/app9061248 Tehrany, 2019, A novel ensemble modeling approach for the spatial prediction of tropical forest fire susceptibility using logitboost machine learning classifier and multi-source geospatial data, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 137, 637, 10.1007/s00704-018-2628-9 Park, 2016, Drought assessment and monitoring through blending of multi-sensor indices using machine learning approaches for different climate regions, Agric. For. Meteorol., 216, 157, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.10.011 Naghibi, 2016, Gis-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran, Environ. Monit. Assess., 188, 1, 10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6 Lee, 2019, Sevucas: A novel gis-based machine learningsoftware for seismic vulnerability assessment, Appl. Sci., 9, 3495, 10.3390/app9173495 Borfecchia, 2010, Active and passive remote sensing for supporting the evaluation of the urban seismic vulnerability, Italian J. Remote Sens., 42, 129, 10.5721/ItJRS201042310 Tesfamariam, 2010, Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings, Struct. Saf., 32, 154, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.002 Liu, 2019, Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale using data mining and giscience technology: application to urumqi (China), Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, 10, 958, 10.1080/19475705.2018.1524400 Gentile, 2020, Gaussian process regression for seismic fragility assessment of building portfolios, Struct. Saf., 87, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101980 Stephen, 2001, Getting the scale right: a comparison of analytical methods for vulnerability assessment and household‐level targeting, Disasters, 25, 113, 10.1111/1467-7717.00165 Shahid, 2008, Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh, Nat. Hazards, 46, 391, 10.1007/s11069-007-9191-5 Yariyan, 2020, Earthquake vulnerability mapping using different hybrid models, Symmetry, 12, 405, 10.3390/sym12030405 Sadighi, 2020, Assessing landslide susceptibility using machine learning models: a comparison between ann, anfis, and anfis-ica, Environ. Earth Sci., 79, 1, 10.1007/s12665-020-09294-8 Sengezer, 2005, A critical analysis of earthquakes and urban planning in Turkey, Disasters, 29, 171, 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00279.x Neumayer, 2006 Cardona, 2000 Han, 2019, A gis-based seismic vulnerability mapping and assessment using ahp: a case study of gyeongju, korea, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 35, 217 Dereli, 2018, Monitoring and prediction of urban expansion using multilayer perceptron neural network by remote sensing and gis technologies: a case study from istanbul metropolitan city, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 27, 9336 Ünal, 2020, Investigating urban heat island intensity in istanbul, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 139, 175, 10.1007/s00704-019-02953-2 Odabasi, 2021, Seismic collapse risk of reinforced concrete tall buildings in istanbul, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1 Parsons, 2000, Heightened odds of large earthquakes near istanbul: an interaction-based probability calculation, Science, 288, 661, 10.1126/science.288.5466.661 Griffiths, 2007, Istanbul at the threshold: an evaluation of the seismic risk in istanbul, Earthq. Spectra, 23, 63, 10.1193/1.2424988 Yamamoto, 2020, Fault geometry beneath the western and central marmara sea, Turkey, based on ocean bottom seismographic observations: implications for future large earthquakes, Tectonophysics, 791, 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228568 Center, 2014 Ergintav, 2014, Istanbul's earthquake hot spots: geodetic constraints on strain accumulation along faults in the marmara seismic gap, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5783, 10.1002/2014GL060985 Dilley, 2005 Smit, 2006, Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environ. Change, 16, 282, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 Wald, 2011, Earthquake impact scale, Nat. Hazards Rev., 12, 125, 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000040 Shadmaan, 2021, Estimation of earthquake vulnerability by using analytical hierarchy process, Nat. Hazards Res., 1, 153, 10.1016/j.nhres.2021.10.005 Alizadeh, 2018, A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (anp-ann) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment, Rem. Sens., 10, 975, 10.3390/rs10060975 Liu, 2011, Response to a high-altitude earthquake: the yushu earthquake example, Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 2, 43, 10.1007/s13753-011-0005-8 Yin, 2009, Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 wenchuan earthquake, sichuan, China, Landslides, 6, 139, 10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5 Goda, 2019, Cascading geological hazards and risks of the 2018 sulawesi Indonesia earthquake and sensitivity analysis of tsunami inundation simulations, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 261, 10.3389/feart.2019.00261 Kamranzad, 2020, Earthquake risk assessment for tehran, Iran, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9, 430, 10.3390/ijgi9070430 Yariyan, 2020, Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with artificial neural networks based on gis: a case study of sanandaj in Iran, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 50, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705 No, 2020, Balancing hazard exposure and walking distance in evacuation route planning during earthquake disasters, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9, 432, 10.3390/ijgi9070432 Bai, 2020, Comparing characteristics of rainfall-and earthquake-triggered landslides in the upper minjiang catchment, China, Eng. Geol., 268, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105518 Hirayama, 2018, Comparative risk study of hydrogen and gasoline dispensers for vehicles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 12584, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.003 Liu, 2020, Post-earthquake medical evacuation system design based on hierarchical multi-objective optimization model: an earthquake case study, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 51, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101785 Önder, 2004, The impact of public perception of earthquake risk on istanbul's housing market, J. R. Estate Lit., 12, 181, 10.1080/10835547.2004.12090136 Crowley, 2020, Exposure model for european seismic risk assessment, Earthq. Spectra, 36, 252, 10.1177/8755293020919429 Bahadori, 2017, Development of an integrated model for seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings: application to mahabad city, Iran, J. Build. Eng., 12, 118, 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.05.014 Fischer, 2002, An integrated model for earthquake risk assessment of buildings, Eng. Struct., 24, 979, 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00018-4 Ellingwood, 2001, Earthquake risk assessment of building structures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74, 251, 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00105-3 Celebi, 1991, Topographical and geological amplification: case studies and engineering implications, Struct. Saf., 10, 199, 10.1016/0167-4730(91)90015-2 Pedersen, 1994, Ground-motion amplitude across ridges, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 1786, 10.1785/BSSA0840061786 Yariyan, 2019, Exploitation of mcda to learn the radial base neural network (rbfnn) aim physical and social vulnerability analysis versus the earthquake (case study: Sanandaj city, iran). International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. Binti Abd Razak, 2021, Seismic vulnerability assessment in ranau, sabah, using two different models, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10, 271, 10.3390/ijgi10050271 Hassanzadeh, 2013, Interactive approach for gis-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (karmania hazard model), Comput. Geosci., 51, 324, 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.016 Rahman, 2015, Gis based mapping of vulnerability to earthquake and fire hazard in dhaka city, Bangladesh, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 13, 291, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.003 Armaş, 2017, Vulnerability to earthquake hazard: bucharest case study, Romania, International journal of disaster risk science, 8, 182, 10.1007/s13753-017-0132-y Cutter, 2000, Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of georgetown county, South Carolina, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 90, 713, 10.1111/0004-5608.00219 Amini Hosseini, 2020, Recognition of vulnerable urban fabrics in earthquake zones: a case study of the tehran metropolitan area, J. Seismol. Earthquake Eng., 10, 175 Ebert, 2009, Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air-and spaceborne imagery and gis data, Nat. Hazards, 48, 275, 10.1007/s11069-008-9264-0 Hizbaron, 2012, Urban vulnerability in bantul district, Indonesia—towards safer and sustainable development, Sustainability, 4, 2022, 10.3390/su4092022 Armaş, 2012, Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of bucharest, Romania, Nat. Hazards, 63, 1129, 10.1007/s11069-012-0209-2 Tantala, 2008, Earthquake loss estimation for the New York city metropolitan region, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 28, 812, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.012 Fort, 2019, Landslides and other damage to buildings and infrastructures following the april-may 2015 earthquake sequence, solukhumbu district, eastern Nepal, J. Nepal Geol. Soc., 59, 95, 10.3126/jngs.v59i0.24995 Scawthorn, 2006, The 1906 san francisco earthquake and fire—enduring lessons for fire protection and water supply, Earthq. Spectra, 22, 135, 10.1193/1.2186678 Sarris, 2010, Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: application to chania city, crete island, Greece, Nat. Hazards, 54, 395, 10.1007/s11069-009-9475-z Duzgun, 2011, An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas, Nat. Hazards, 59, 917, 10.1007/s11069-011-9808-6 Pourghasemi, 2013, Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances, Nat. Hazards, 69, 749, 10.1007/s11069-013-0728-5 Ghosh, 2021, Soil erosion susceptibility assessment using logistic regression, decision tree and random forest: study on the mayurakshi river basin of eastern India, Environ. Earth Sci., 80, 1, 10.1007/s12665-021-09631-5 Yariyan, 2020, Gis-based spatial modeling of snow avalanches using four novel ensemble models, Sci. Total Environ., 745, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141008 Tshering, 2020, A comparison of the qualitative analytic hierarchy process and the quantitative frequency ratio techniques in predicting forest fire-prone areas in Bhutan using gis, Forecasting, 2, 36, 10.3390/forecast2020003 Sinaga, 2020, Unsupervised k-means clustering algorithm, IEEE Access, 8, 80716, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796 Karmenova, M., Nugumanova, A., Tlebaldinova, A., Beldeubaev, A., Popova, G. & Sedchenko, A., Year. Seismic assessment of urban buildings using data mining methodsed.^eds. Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications, 154-159. Han, 2011 Yanilmaz, 2021, Extension of fema and smug models with bayesian best-worst method for disaster risk reduction, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102631 Şengezer, 2008, Evaluation of parameters affecting earthquake damage by decision tree techniques, Nat. Hazards, 47, 547, 10.1007/s11069-008-9238-2 Saito, 2009, Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: the akaishi mountains, Japan, Geomorphology, 109, 108, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.026 Roe, 2005, Boosted decision trees as an alternative to artificial neural networks for particle identification, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 543, 577, 10.1016/j.nima.2004.12.018 Berry, 2004 Tehrany, 2019, Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques, Catena, 175, 174, 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011 Safavian, 1991, A survey of decision tree classifier methodology, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernetics, 21, 660, 10.1109/21.97458 Schneevoigt, 2008, Detecting alpine landforms from remotely sensed imagery. A pilot study in the bavarian alps, Geomorphology, 93, 104, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.034 Yao, 2008, Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China, Geomorphology, 101, 572, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 Micheletti, 2011, vol. 13 Luo, 2019, Mine landslide susceptibility assessment using ivm, ann and svm models considering the contribution of affecting factors, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0215134 Shawe-Taylor, 2000 Vapnik, 1999 Damaševičius, 2010, Optimization of svm parameters for recognition of regulatory DNA sequences, Top, 18, 339, 10.1007/s11750-010-0152-x Zhou, 2021, Performance evaluation of hybrid ga–svm and gwo–svm models to predict earthquake-induced liquefaction potential of soil: a multi-dataset investigation, Eng. Comput., 1 Huang, 2018, Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines, Catena, 165, 520, 10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003 Friedel, 2011, Modeling hydrologic and geomorphic hazards across post-fire landscapes using a self-organizing map approach, Environ. Model. Software, 26, 1660, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.001 Ritter, 1986, On the stationary state of kohonen's self-organizing sensory mapping, Biol. Cybern., 54, 99, 10.1007/BF00320480 Kohonen, 1990, The self-organizing map, Proc. IEEE, 78, 1464, 10.1109/5.58325 Vesanto, 2000, Clustering of the self-organizing map, IEEE Trans. Neural Network., 11, 586, 10.1109/72.846731 Li, 2020, Landslide susceptibility evaluation using hybrid integration of evidential belief function and machine learning techniques, Water, 12, 113, 10.3390/w12010113 Rafique, 2019, Predictive analysis of landmine risk, IEEE Access, 7, 107259, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929677 Tehrany, 2018, The application of a dempster–shafer-based evidential belief function in flood susceptibility mapping and comparison with frequency ratio and logistic regression methods, Environ. Earth Sci., 77, 1, 10.1007/s12665-018-7667-0 Beguería, 2006, Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management, Nat. Hazards, 37, 315, 10.1007/s11069-005-5182-6 Hanley, 1982, The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve, Radiology, 143, 29, 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 Lobo, 2008, Auc: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 17, 145, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x Yousefi, 2020, A novel gis-based ensemble technique for rangeland downward trend mapping as an ecological indicator change, Ecol. Indicat., 117, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106591 Kavzoglu, 2015, An assessment of multivariate and bivariate approaches in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study of duzkoy district, Nat. Hazards, 76, 471, 10.1007/s11069-014-1506-8 Ida, 2022, Analysis of seismic activity using self-organizing map: implications for earthquake prediction, Pure Appl. Geophys., 179, 1, 10.1007/s00024-021-02916-7 Baskaya, 2018, Revealing landscape planning strategies for disaster-prone coastal urban environments: the case of istanbul megacity, Sea Level Rise Coastal Infrastruct., 139, 10.5772/intechopen.73567 Baskaya, 2015, Disaster sensitive landscape planning for the coastal megacity of istanbul, J. Coast Conserv., 19, 729, 10.1007/s11852-014-0365-5 Högberg Yilmaz, 2020 Jabareen, 2013, Planning the resilient city: concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk, Cities, 31, 220, 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004 Uysal, 2018, Mapping urban growth and its relation to seismic hazards in istanbul, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 46, 1307, 10.1007/s12524-018-0799-6 Kraemer, 2014, Climate change is a global mega-trend for sovereign risk, Credit Week, 28, 9 Erdik, 2008, Earthquake risk and its mitigation in istanbul, Nat. Hazards, 44, 181, 10.1007/s11069-007-9110-9 Hahn, 2009, The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study in Mozambique, Global Environ. Change, 19, 74, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002