Evaluating the 21-gene assay Recurrence Score® as a predictor of clinical response to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant exemestane in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
Tóm tắt
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the results of the Recurrence Score (RS) assay and the clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Core biopsy samples at baseline and post-treatment surgical samples were obtained from 80 and 77 of 116 patients, respectively, enrolled in the multicenter prospective study of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy (JFMC34-0601). The 21-gene assay was performed after appropriate manual microdissection. The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 were assayed by immunohistochemistry at a central laboratory. Clinical response was assessed based on the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) guideline. Sixty-four core biopsy samples and 52 resection samples met the RS quality requirements. The clinical response rate in those patients with a low RS result (low RS group; 19/32, 59.4 %) was significantly higher than that in those patients with a high RS result (high RS group; 3/15, 20.0 %) (P = 0.015) and similar to that in patients with an intermediate RS result (intermediate RS group; 10/17, 58.8 %). The rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were 90.6 % (29/32) in the low RS group, 76.5 % (13/17) in the intermediate RS group and 46.7 % (7/15) in the high RS group. The odds ratio for BCS adjusted for continuous baseline Ki-67 was 0.114 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.014–0.721; P = 0.028] between the high and low RS groups. RS values in pre-treatment samples were highly correlated with those in post-treatment samples (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.745, 95 % CI 0.592–0.846). Our results demonstrate the predictive value of the RS for clinical response to neoadjuvant exemestane therapy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15:2483–2493
Chia S, Swain SM, Byrd DR et al (2008) Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:786–790
Makris A, Powles TJ, Ashley SE et al (1998) A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Oncol 9:1179–1184
Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Avril A et al (1999) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonie Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). Ann Oncol 10:47–52
Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Can Inst 97:188–194
Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA et al (2007) Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer 110:244–254
Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2–3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29:2342–2349
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes––dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747
Chang J, Powles TJ, Allred DC et al (2000) Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients. Clin Can Res 6:616–621
Miller WR, White S, Dixon JM et al (2006) Proliferation, steroid receptors and clinical/pathological response in breast cancer treated with letrozole. Br J Can 94:1051–1056
Toi M, Saji S, Masuda N et al (2011) Ki-67 index changes, pathological response and clinical benefits in primary breast cancer patients treated with 24 weeks of aromatase inhibition. Can Sci 102:858–865
Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65
Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B et al (2010) Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of loco-regional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 28:1677–1683
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. New Engl J Med 351:2817–2826
Tang G, Shak S, Paik S et al (2011) Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and adjuvant! For women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Can Res Treat 127:133–142
Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2013) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN®). Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site
Aebi S, Davidson T, Gruber G et al (2011) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 22[Suppl 6: vi]:12–24
Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R et al (2007) American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5287–5312
Chang JC, Makris A, Gutierrez MC et al (2008) Gene expression patterns in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded core biopsies predict docetaxel chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Breast Can Res Treat 108:233–240
Gianni L, Zambetti M, Clark K et al (2005) Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7265–7277
Akashi-Tanaka S, Shimizu C, Ando M et al (2009) 21-Gene expression profile assay on core needle biopsies predicts responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast 18:171–174
Ellis MJ, Ma C (2007) Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial. Breast Can Res Treat 105[Suppl 1]:33–43
Kim C, Tang G, Pogue-Geile KL et al (2011) Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4160–4167
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874
Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR et al (2007) Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression after short-term presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Can Inst 99:167–170
Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Luo J et al (2008) Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on post neoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics. J Natl Can Inst 100:1380–1388
Chia YH, Ellis MJ, Ma CX (2010) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool. Br J Can 103:759–764