Evaluating arguments in instruction: Theoretical and practical directions

Thinking Skills and Creativity - Tập 24 - Trang 95-103 - 2017
Amnon Glassner1
1Kaye Academic College of Education, Israel

Tài liệu tham khảo

Angell, 1964 Beardsley, 1950 Billig, 1996 Brem, 2000, Explanation and evidence in informal argument, Cognitive Science, 24, 573, 10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2 Chambliss, 1995, Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778, 10.2307/748198 Finocchiaro, 2003, Dialectics, evaluation and argument, Informal Logic, 23, 19 Freeman, 1991 Glassner, 2005, The anti-logos ability to evaluate information supporting moral arguments, Learning and Instruction, 15, 353, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.002 Glassner, 2007, What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? argumentation?, Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 10, 10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001 Glassner, 2014, Learning argumentation practices in school with a graphical synchronous discussion tool, 418 Glassner, 2005, Pupils’ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 105, 10.1348/000709904X22278 Goldman, 1999 Goldman, 2003, An epistemological approach to argumentation, Informal Logic, 23, 51 Govier, 2000 Hamblin, 1970 Jacobs, 2002, The development of judgment and decision making during childhood and adolescence, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 145, 10.1111/1467-8721.00188 Johnson, 1994 1980 Keyes, 2004 Kuhn, 1991 Kuhn, 1999, A developmental model of critical thinking, Educational Researcher, 28, 16, 10.3102/0013189X028002016 Kuhn, 2001, How do people know?, Psychological Science, 12, 1, 10.1111/1467-9280.00302 Leibowitz, 1982 McPeck, 1981 Means, 1996, Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels, Cognition & Instruction, 14, 139, 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1 Nisbett, 1980 Paul, 1982, Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense, Informal Logic Newsletter, 4, 2 Perelman, 1969 Pinto, 1994, Logic, epistemology and argument appraisal, 116 Scardamalia, 1994, Computer support for knowledge building communities, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 185, 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3 Schwarz, 2003, The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues, 227 Schwarz, 2007, The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools, Ij CSCL, 2, 449 Schwarz, 2003, Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: an empirical study, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, e221, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3 Scriven, 1976 Siegel, 1988 Slob, 2002, How to distinguish good argument and bad argument: Dialogico-rhetorical normativity, Argumentation, 16, 179, 10.1023/A:1015589400146 Thomas, 1973 Van Gelder, 2001, How to improve critical thinking using educational technology, 539 Van Gelder, 2003, Enhancing deliberation through computer supported visualization, 97 Walton, 1989 Weinstein, 1990, Towards an account of argumentation in science, Argumentation, 4, 269, 10.1007/BF00173968 Wellman, 1971 Eemeren van, 1996