Evaluating arguments in instruction: Theoretical and practical directions
Tài liệu tham khảo
Angell, 1964
Beardsley, 1950
Billig, 1996
Brem, 2000, Explanation and evidence in informal argument, Cognitive Science, 24, 573, 10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2
Chambliss, 1995, Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778, 10.2307/748198
Finocchiaro, 2003, Dialectics, evaluation and argument, Informal Logic, 23, 19
Freeman, 1991
Glassner, 2005, The anti-logos ability to evaluate information supporting moral arguments, Learning and Instruction, 15, 353, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.002
Glassner, 2007, What stands and develops between creative and critical thinking? argumentation?, Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 10, 10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.001
Glassner, 2014, Learning argumentation practices in school with a graphical synchronous discussion tool, 418
Glassner, 2005, Pupils’ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 105, 10.1348/000709904X22278
Goldman, 1999
Goldman, 2003, An epistemological approach to argumentation, Informal Logic, 23, 51
Govier, 2000
Hamblin, 1970
Jacobs, 2002, The development of judgment and decision making during childhood and adolescence, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 145, 10.1111/1467-8721.00188
Johnson, 1994
1980
Keyes, 2004
Kuhn, 1991
Kuhn, 1999, A developmental model of critical thinking, Educational Researcher, 28, 16, 10.3102/0013189X028002016
Kuhn, 2001, How do people know?, Psychological Science, 12, 1, 10.1111/1467-9280.00302
Leibowitz, 1982
McPeck, 1981
Means, 1996, Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels, Cognition & Instruction, 14, 139, 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
Nisbett, 1980
Paul, 1982, Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense, Informal Logic Newsletter, 4, 2
Perelman, 1969
Pinto, 1994, Logic, epistemology and argument appraisal, 116
Scardamalia, 1994, Computer support for knowledge building communities, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 185, 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
Schwarz, 2003, The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues, 227
Schwarz, 2007, The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools, Ij CSCL, 2, 449
Schwarz, 2003, Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: an empirical study, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, e221, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3
Scriven, 1976
Siegel, 1988
Slob, 2002, How to distinguish good argument and bad argument: Dialogico-rhetorical normativity, Argumentation, 16, 179, 10.1023/A:1015589400146
Thomas, 1973
Van Gelder, 2001, How to improve critical thinking using educational technology, 539
Van Gelder, 2003, Enhancing deliberation through computer supported visualization, 97
Walton, 1989
Weinstein, 1990, Towards an account of argumentation in science, Argumentation, 4, 269, 10.1007/BF00173968
Wellman, 1971
Eemeren van, 1996